Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

427. Mailboxes to Bonetown: Amanda and Sarah Talk Sex Ratings

We received an email from Megan, who wanted to know about the possibility of building a rating system for sex in books. TL;DR, we don’t think it’s entirely feasible given how subjective heat levels can be for different readers, but the idea gives us a lot to talk about.

We also talk about Prime Day this week, my younger child’s bar mitzvah, which was last weekend, virtually, from our backyard, and different levels of friendship.

What about you? What would your sex rating system look like? What elements would you want to highlight? Think it’s doable? Email us! We love hearing from you.

Music: purple-planet.com

Read the transcript

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

First cup of Coffee with Jeffe Kennedy - a large black hat with a large brim above a cup of coffee in a gold striped mugYou can listen to First Cup of Coffee with Jeffe Kennedy wherever you find your podcasts!

We also mentioned the following in this episode (get ready for recipes, and we’re sorry in advance):

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at sbjpodcast@gmail.com or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Click to view the transcript

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

Uncategorized

Add Your Comment →

  1. DiscoDollyDeb says:

    I don’t think a ratings system (regarding heat level, as opposed to a general grade for the entire book) is workable because everyone’s definition of “heat” varies. One women’s “holy fuck, this book is hot as hell” is another woman’s “the sex scenes are dull and repetitive, feel free to skip them.” I’ve read some books that I would classify as “smoking” because of drawn out sexual tension and how the story delves into the thoughts, feelings (sexual & otherwise), and motivations of the MCs. And then I’ve read books with menages, sex toys, reverse harems, bdsm clubs, plus all manner of apparatus and appurtenances, that left me generally “meh” about the whole enterprise because what was going on in the minds and hearts of the MCs was completely overlooked. But that’s just me and my (admittedly subjective) opinion.

  2. cheryl says:

    i think DiscoDollyDeb hit the mark exactly. And keyed into why a certain Necromancer’s novels went from blistering to “oh god, let’s just skip all this” when they went from internally driven to poly/BDSM politics.

  3. Nicolette says:

    It would be subjective to describe how hot the sex is, but a more objective approach could be how much / how explicit the sex is. There’s a difference between erotica (explicit sex all the time) vs. explicit sex that’s not erotica vs. non-explicit sex vs. fade-to-black vs. just kissing (like in so-called chick lit books). Even if those terms vary slightly from reader to reader, SBTB could define what it means for reviews here.

    I too would love a heat/sex rating. I’ve picked up romance books before expecting sex (and the emotional bonding that comes with it) and gotten just kissing – and vice versa.

  4. Stefanie Magura says:

    @SBAmanda:

    How can barbecue and honey mustard be the only choices? LOL. I only eat mine with ranch dressing. Call back to podcast episode 400.

  5. chacha1 says:

    I laughed so many times reading this. 🙂 Went looking for that saving her life thing and now I have your post about ‘Decadent’ to read. Thank you!

    The ‘how hot is it’ question is definitely one I’m interested in as a reader, because I’m with Amanda. But it is SO subjective! Can’t help feeling the only key that might work across all the sub-genres is a combination of descriptiveness and frequency.

    E.g. frequent extremely graphic sex scenes; occasional descriptive sex scenes; closed-door or fade-to-black sex scenes; kissing only. And even then some readers would want you to specify the gender combination(s) and any kink.

    I always specify the gender combination in my book descriptions. If there’s any content I want to call out as potentially triggery, I put that in the title’s launch post on my blog. But there are probably readers who would say ‘you should do that on Goodreads/Instagram/FB/Twitter’ and there really is only so much time a person can put into trying to please everybody.

    If we’re talking about preference rather than need (i.e. I like graphic sex scenes vs I will have a PTSD meltdown if there is a rape or a shooting on the page), this is kind of insoluble.

    In the case of actual triggers, ultimately I think it’s the author’s responsibility to be informed about reader concerns and up-front about content. On the flip side, if a reader has a real need to avoid certain kinds of content, it’s that reader’s responsibility to do some investigation of a new-to-them author. I personally would be thrilled to get an email from a potential reader asking whether my stuff is safe for them to read.

  6. San says:

    Yay! You’re welcome for the pepper joke! (not original to me, but i don’t remember where i first heard it, it’s been around a looooooong time like most bad jokes!)

    I also don’t think there can ever be a rating system that would work for enough people to be worth the work it would take, and the potential for mishaps is indeed way too huge. It does remind me though of this from Delilah S. Dawson: https://twitter.com/delilahsdawson/status/1105187159093456898?lang=en
    which is ever-amusing and adorable.

  7. @Amanda says:

    @Stefanie: My apologies! I do love ranch, but I pretty much only use it for eating pizza and carrots.

  8. Stefanie Magura says:

    @SBAmanda:

    Ha ha ha. Understood. There are foods I only eat with other foods as well. I am the opposite of you in that I’m not particularly a honey mustard fan. It’s sweeter than I like. I suspect there are some of us who like buffalo sauce and blue cheese dressing for their chicken tenders both of which I’ve enjoyed on occasion, and somewhere in there is a joke about how chicken tender and sauce or any food preferences could relate to romance novel tastes. 🙂 As far as reading descriptors are concerned I like sweet and spicy as opposed to clean and dirty. Clean and dirty feels to me like a negative judgement call somehow for the authors who choose to write and the readers who choose to read it. I’m not sure how this would translate to a rating system though.

  9. Stefanie Magura says:

    @SBSarah:

    Maybe I ought to try your honey mustard. That actually sounds pretty good.

    @SBAmanda:

    I’m interested to see what you’d think of a chicken bacon ranch pizza.

  10. ReadKnitSnark says:

    That breastmilk book is totally Virginia Henley’s A Year and a Day. Just sayin’.

  11. FashionablyEvil says:

    This podcast put me in mind of Emily Nagoski’s book COME AS YOU ARE where she talks about accelerators and brakes and how different behaviors can provoke very different responses For example, tickling can be funny and silly or actual torment, and how you feel about it can depend on the day, your mood, other things going on in your life. Sometimes you want to read all the steamy scenes and some days it’s like, “meh, okay, he’s going down on her, and now we’re back to the plot line with the meddling aunt, cool, I like her.”
    This is part of why I don’t re-read all that often—what I thought was 5 peppers the first time doesn’t hold up on second read.

  12. @Amanda says:

    @Stefanie: I’ve eat and enjoyed chicken bacon ranch pizzas! Though my go-to ranch dipping pizzas are usually Hawaiian or a pepperoni, onion, and green pepper pizza.

  13. Escapeologist says:

    SB Sarah is on today’s episode of the Heaving Bosoms podcast!!! My Monday has been made!

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top