Other Media Review

Movie Review: Pride & Prejudice & Zombies

A wholly unnecessary movie adaptation of the mash-up novel that took Pride and Prejudice and added zombies, starring Lily James, Charles Dance, Matt Smith, some guy as Darcy, and featuring Lena Headey. Carrie and I both saw it, and we do not agree at ALL.

RHG: I AM SO MAD

CarrieS: I’m not mad at all. I got exactly what I expected to get. I mean, there wasn’t anything misleading about their marketing. Or the title.

RHG: Before the movie opened, Seanan Maguire expressed the concern that the book held a certain amount of contempt for the source material, and worried that the movie would, as well. And since the conceit of the book was “Take Pride and Prejudice, just add zombies” and what we got in the movie was “Well, the plot of Pride and Prejudice is boring, so we’re gonna add this shit about thinking zombies and Wickham as the mastermind and pretty much throw the charm out the window.” I think Seanan’s concerns were well founded.

Yes, parts were good and well done (Bennett Sisters Power Walk, Matt Smith) but mostly the more I think about things, the madder I get.

It’s like that blurb two months ago that said, “Oh, this gives Jane Austen a much-needed injection of feminism!” was brought to life in all of its bullshit.

Pride, Prejudice and Popcorn
A | BN | K | AB
CarrieS: While the blurb is contemptuous, I thought the movie was very affectionate. In my book Pride, Prejudice, and Popcorn: TV and Film Adaptations of Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, and Jane Eyre, I reviewed numerous TV and film adaptations of Pride and Prejudice ranging from faithful to not faithful at all. I found that I didn’t care what happened with the plot or the setting as long as the themes and characters retained their essential qualities, and for all the silliness of this movie, the characters and themes remained pretty intact.

I thought Wickham was charming, although he wasn’t my favorite Wickham, and he was certainly glib. All the essential themes of Austen are there: don’t trust first impressions, know your self-worth but don’t succumb to unwarranted pride, give and take in a relationship, and remember that it’s better to be smart and active than to be refined. Also, that glib charming dude is totally going to defile your sister and/or eat your brains. Check, check, check.

Now was it a good movie? HELL NO.

But I would totally watch it again, at like 3AM, on Netflix. It was a bad version of Pride and Prejudice, because even if you don’t stuff a zombie uprising in there, it’s almost impossible to get all of P&P into 2 hours (I have studied this at length – there’s always gonna be a ton of stuff thrown to the wind). It was a bad horror movie, because it wasn’t scary, and when I say something isn’t scary that’s saying a lot because I am an easy scare. It was a bad zombie movie, because NOTHING MADE SENSE. Jesus Lord God, these people wandering into the woods alone – they all deserved to be eaten. The whole movie had a terrible case of ADHD – it would present us with something interesting and then veer away immediately, as if distracted by something shiny. Poorly written and directed – yup. Contemptuous? Oh, I’ve seen WAAAAAY worse. I felt perversely fond of it.

Pride & Prejudice
A | BN | K | AB
RHG:  I just got into a drunken fight over whether horses can commit murder. The answer is “no” in case you were wondering.

Anyway. It was TERRIBLE. I did in fact, utter, “What the actual fuck?” when Darcy dropped the Persuasion ( A | BN | K | G | AB | Au ) quote. Out loud. The zombie mechanics didn’t make sense, and WHY THE FUCK DID LIZZIE NOT DROP A HEADSHOT WHEN IT WOULD HAVE MATTERED? WHY? COME ON.

It was nice to see Charles Dance actual portraying a competent father, though. I mean, except for Darcy and Bingley, the actors were all really well cast. I do love Lily James, and Matt Smith as Mr. Collins was the best Mr. Collins I’ve seen. So like, there’s some connective tissue of a good movie there; it’s mostly the script that lets everyone down and needs to be burned down.

CarrieS: Matt Smith was truly a joy, as was Lena Headey, who was basically Cersei with morals. I adore her. Bingley has only two jobs and those are to look pretty and be nice, and he certainly did bland niceness well and OMG HE IS SO PRETTY I CAN’T EVEN WHO IS IS THIS GLORIOUS HUMAN. He had the same affect on me in Jupiter Ascending: he’s so gorgeous that’s there’s almost an uncanny valley effect. I MEAN THOSE LIPS. So I thought he was fine. Darcy was neither great nor awful – he did a good brood but not so much with the sex appeal. And LILY! Honey! I just…

I mean…

I was not crazy about the recent Disney Cinderella, but she earned that paycheck, man. Same here – she COMMITS. She’s all “I have to once again wear something tight and uncomfortable while the camera stares down my front for two hours but DAMN IT I’M GONNA SAY THESE LINES WITH CONVICTION. THEY ARE DUMB LINES BUT I’M GONNA SAY THEM RIGHT!

There were a lot of clever bits in the first half, but the more it got into the zombie drama the worse the movie got. For example, I found it clever the way the movie used China and Japan as status markers. I enjoyed Caroline sniping about how Lizzie was trained in China, and Darcy being interested in Lizzie reading, “The Art of War,” and her sniping at him in Chinese, which was a double snipe. At least.

It was fun to watch the movie with my husband because we kept getting pissed about different things.

Me: “The next two dances in a ROW? Jesus, Bingley, why don’t you guys just have sex on the dance floor already?”

Glen: “Lizzie should not have drawn steel against an unarmed man, because that is NOT DONE. There are RULES. There are SOCIAL CONVENTIONS.”

The only thing that actively pissed me off was the line from Persuasion, and it’s the only moment where I think the word “contemptuous” applies – it lacks faith in Darcy’s own speeches, and it assumes that we won’t recognize the quote.

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
A | BN | K | AB
This is a movie where your mood and expectation going in are all important, and after all those adaptations and readings, and essays, and my own writing, it was just so deeply satisfying to watch everyone run around wreaking havoc… I found it cathartic. And I really don’t see why one would expect the plot to adhere all the way through the plot of Pride and Prejudice, or even the book Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. If you are going to do a movie that involves Austen and zombies, I say go big or go home. The more batshit, the better. I’d think you’d assume that the plot would range far afield as soon as they put “Zombies” in the title.

I also think it’s totally fair to say that you found the movie to be a desecration of the Jane, and I found it to be a rollicking and deeply affectionate good time, and yet agree that it was bad. The only question is whether it’s “bad” or “so bad it’s good.” I’d argue the latter, but that’s so deeply subjective. It had some bits that were truly clever and fun, and nothing involving zombies made the slightest sense at all – have the filmmakers even seen a zombie movie? Why is everyone acting like idiots? Me: Oooh, I like her purple dress with the slits for easy kicking! And it’s purple!” Glen: You know, moats don’t stop zombies, don’t they know that?”

Me: “Oooh, I like her purple dress with the slits for easy kicking! And it’s purple!” Glen: You know, moats don’t stop zombies, don’t they know that?”

Glen: “You know, moats don’t stop zombies, don’t they know that?”

RHG: I am dubious that Mr. Bennett didn’t make sure his daughters knew how to gird their loins with their long skirts.

The interiors and the set decoration were nice?

CarrieS: The ball was one of the best I’ve seen, even without the zombie battle.

RHG: It was well lit. Very well lit (candlelight rather than set lights that couldn’t have been real).

But this was an hour and a half, so even with shoehorning in zombie shit, they could have had another 30 minutes to have more actual Austen and stay within the platonic ideal of a 2 hour 8 minute movie. (I mean, thank god they didn’t, because they would have fucked it up.)

But yeah, I’m just more disappointed and mad than I expected to be, and I was expecting nothing but Lily James power-walking through a ball and a milquetoast Darcy.

CarrieS: See, I thought that while they didn’t do the Austen SUPERBLY, they did just fine. All the characters stayed true to the essentials of the original characters. All the themes and, dare, I say, moral lessons were intact. The only thing that bummed me out was I wanted about 45 more scenes of Lizzie and her sisters fighting in formation, and the Persuasion quote pissed me right off. I didn’t think they let Lizzie fight nearly enough. But I knew from the trailers exactly what the movie would be and I got exactly that. I thought it was fond and fun, but particularly in the second half as dumb as a bag of hair.

I believe that in my case, my experience is affected by having studied so many other adaptations, not because I think I’m an expert, but because after all those serious scenes of Darcy proposing badly I’m ready to watch Lizzie kick the shit out him. This is the precise movie that English majors should get drunk and watch during finals week.

I have to say that while I really can’t defend the movie on many artistic merits (I liked most of the casting, all of the costuming, some of the dialogue, and set pieces), it was worth $11.75 for me to see the look on Darcy’s face after he watches Lizzie slay a shit ton of zombies, and he says, totally stunned, the line from the book about how exercise brightens her eyes. That was a glorious moment.

I’d give it a C-, if it raged you out so much I’d even be willing to go for a D+, with the caveat that personally it was in the “so bad it’s good super fun” category as opposed to the “rage stroke” category. I mean, you saw all the trailers, right? It promised zombie stupidity and Lily James, and it gave us zombie stupidity and Lily James. It’s not like it lures the viewer in with false promises. It’s a good midnight movie.

RHG: I do not think it was so bad it’s good – it’s just bad and annoying and, even drunk, I don’t want to watch this again. I have Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters for that. I just want to give it an F and tell people to save their $12.99 ($14.49 with Fandango fees), but I can’t actually save people from themselves. Sadly.

I will GRUDGINGLY accept the D+. But I’m grumpy about it.

Carrie S: Matt and Lena and Lily alone pull it to a D+. Also that purple coat – I do love the costuming in the movie.

I eagerly await the comments section!

RHG: You should get your mom to make you that coat.

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is in theaters now and you can find tickets (US) at Fandango and Moviefone.

Add Your Comment →

  1. library addict says:

    I have no intention of seeing this as zombies are so not my thing. But I’m glad to think Lily James’ character here has some agency.

    I enjoyed the latest Disney adaptation of Cinderella for her performance, but saw it on DVD as opposed to in the movie theatre. And I so wish the two deleted scenes with her character had been left in as they were the only scenes in the film which showed her being proactive and not just reactive.

    The costumes do look good in the trailer and the Bennet Sisters Power Walk does tempt me. But the zombies…I just can’t.

  2. Meljean says:

    I know I’ll end up seeing this, because I won’t be able to help myself. I hoped the movie would be better than the book (P&P and Zombies! it should have been everything I loved, but I agree that the tone moved beyond parody and into contempt, especially toward anything feminine).

    I will settle for a “so bad it’s fun” movie, though. So my fingers are crossed that’s how it goes for me.

  3. Anony Miss says:

    I ADORE the book, mostly because of the delicate snark therein, plus the occasional dirty joke all the characters have to pretend they don’t condone of. Marvelous.

    But I doubted the film would be able to retain the subtle bits.

    Also in the book the obsession with ninjas instead of governesses, and martial skill in place of other accomplishments is so well done that I’m thrilled they were able to work that into the movie.

    I really want to see it.

    This is the precise movie that English majors should get drunk and watch during finals week.

    Sold, even though my last finals week was 17 years ago.

  4. JessicaG says:

    “Oh, this gives Jane Austen a much-needed injection of feminism!”

    My husband once said that he was surprised that I liked Pride and Prejudice so much, as it wasn’t a very feminist book. He got schooled….hard.

  5. Anony Miss says:

    … And Carrie, since you’re an expert, didn’t you appreciate that in the book Wickham gets his very best comeuppance ever? I hope the movie kept that!!!

  6. Cate says:

    Is this a brilliant film … No. But it is a hang your brain out to dry, & pass the Barolo enjoyable. Perhaps if there was a little more Matt Smith & a little less Sam Riley it might have a bit more ooomph. BUT … It isn’t the utter disaster that Abraham Lincoln-Vampire Slayer was ! Now that film was 120 minutes of my life that I will never get back again !

  7. Algae says:

    Did you see io9’s review? It’s titled “When You Netflix Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, You’ll Be Somewhat Amused” and it feels like that’s a really accurate description.

  8. bookworm1990 says:

    I’m glad to hear it’s not that scary because I’m a wimp. I’m taking my younger sister go see it tonight, and we are hoping for an “it’s so bad it’s good.” She read P&P&Z thought, so her expectations will be higher. I’m here for the mannerpunk costumes.

  9. Bea says:

    In medieval thought, actually, animals could be tried for murder. Which is the plot of the otherwise dubious Colin Firth film The Advocate.

  10. Lostshadows says:

    Just a note, there seems to be several small parts of the review that appear twice.

  11. SB Sarah says:

    @Lostshadows: DAMMIT. We’re having this weird repeating text error that shows up intermittently so I can’t identify what causes it and then make it stop. Thank you for the heads up.

    ETA: I think I fixed it. Sorry about that. (ARGH.)

  12. Rae says:

    I have to go with the so bad it’s good. But I am also horrible at thinking about why I liked/didn’t like a movie, so I usually have to be prompted into it by a discussion like this. Agree: Matt Smith was brilliant. Favorite Collins, ever! Hits the comedic timing so perfectly, so he doesn’t come off as a total sleeze-bucket. Darcy just wasn’t right, but I did like Lizzie, overall.

    I think what the problem ends up really being is that it really tries to pay homage to the P&P movies, but not to the charming and good parts of them. Darcy dives into the lake–but we don’t get the satisfaction of seeing him dripping wet *out* of the lake. And they shot in many of the houses and even rooms (if I am remembering correctly) that were used in the 2005 and Colin Firth versions, but unless you’re a total Austen geek that means nothing to the audience. They just took the wrong parts, or gleaned the entirely wrong points from those movie versions which worked because they were charming (or fantastic in the case of CF’s) versions of the book. I think someone watched the movies and never read the original source material. Which is super disappointing because Natalie Portman was an executive producer and considering how smart she is supposed to be, she should at least have said, “Whoa, hold the Persuasion line, this isn’t Jane Austen and zombies.” Although that would have very possibly made for a much cooler movie–all Jane Austen characters mashed together speaking lines from their text, and Jane Austen kicking some zombie ass.

    I can’t speak to the zombies because I know nothing about zombies or zombie media. So, that all made perfect sense to me. As much as zombies can.

  13. denise says:

    even if it is a hot mess, for some silly reason, I still want to see it.

  14. CateM says:

    I loved it, and I intend to buy it and watch it on bad days. I did love the costumes, and the characters (def. my fave Mr. Collins), and when they use the zombie/ fighting concept to make the dry understated Jane Austen lines even more hilariously understated, I loved it, because it wasn’t working against the source material, it was just playing with it. Generally, I found it entertaining and deeply satisfying.

    The movie did have problems with pacing. Also the morals in regards to the zombies were a bit messed up. I don’t think you can introduce the fact that maybe zombies can be saved if they just live off of pigs brains, and then have Darcy accelerate the change (i.e. destroy their remaining humanity) in a huge number of zombies for the sake of one person, without it taking on at least a little bit of moral weight. So not a perfect movie, by any means. But I’d happily give it a B. It did almost exactly what it set out to do, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Plus, truth in advertising, so it’s pretty easy to avoid if you don’t want zombies in your Pride & Prejudice.

  15. Mary Franc says:

    I had a great time watching this movie and everyone at the theatre seemed to enjoy it too. Her reaction to Mr. Darcy’s first proposal was worth the price of admission.

  16. MissyLaLa says:

    As Jane Austen and Pride and Prejudice are PERFECTION, I refused to read P&P with Zombies, and I’ll likely refuse to watch the movie version (unless it comes to Netflix and I’m very very bored and sleepless one night).

    I still just Can’t Even with the whole concept.

    Zombies go with Elizabeth Bennett and Fitzwilliam Darcy like Jersey Shore characters go with Han Solo and Princess Leia.

  17. LauraL says:

    My husband gifted me the book in one of his attempts to get me interested in zombies. I DNF’d the book. He read it and liked it, because zombies. I have a feeling we’ll be seeing this movie. I am looking forward to the sets and costumes after seeing the promos. Mr. L can have his zombies.

  18. Susan says:

    Love the how-to-gird tutorial! 🙂

    I actually like zombies. (I have a very low threshold for horror movies, but the old-timey zombies were kinda slow and bumbling so I figured they were the only kind of monster I’d ever have a chance of escaping. They’ve morphed into bigger badasses these days so I’d be brain toast in a current zombie apocalypse.) And I like P&P. But I despised the book and DNF’d it. I might watch this on Amazon/Netflix, but I wouldn’t pay to see it in a theater.

  19. Kilian Metcalf says:

    I enjoyed the book because I am open to the humor of juxtaposition of incongruous concepts. It was a funny-once joke, and I haven’t read any of the imitation books that came out like a flood after the success of the PP&Z book. Zombies are not scary to me, so that’s not a factor. I’ll wait until it comes to the cheap seats ($3.00 in Tucson) of the second-run movie theaters, buy some popcorn and surrender 90 minutes of my life to mindless fun. Since my expectations are so low that the costumes and dancing will make me happy, I have nothing to lose, and I’m sure I won’t be disappointed. Put me firmly in the ‘so bad it’s good’ camp.

  20. Maureen says:

    So, I would love to see this movie-but I have such an aversion to zombies-I can’t even watch those old Geico commercials. Sometimes I wish I wasn’t such a wimp.

    Wow, the blurb that this movie gives Jane Austen a “much needed injection of feminism” has obviously never read any of her novels. Was marriage important? Hell yes, because women couldn’t just go out, get a job an support themselves. Servants of course got paid, but not much. Lizzie Bennett wasn’t going to go out and be a scullery maid.

    I probably shouldn’t even be commenting, since I didn’t read the book (zombie phobia) or see the movie (EXTREME zombie phobia). I was working at Borders when the book first came out, and we couldn’t keep it in the store. It was shocking to everyone how well it sold.

    I do love Jane Austen though 🙂

  21. Friday says:

    Dammit. I was so hoping it was going to be terrific.

  22. Booklovingirl says:

    What was the persuasion line?

  23. Colleen Moore says:

    I’m Team Carrie on this one. I took myself on a solo date night and enjoyed the hell out of it! I got the campy remake of a beloved classic with just enough clever bits to keep me thoroughly entertained. Was it a great movie? No. Are the kickass proposal scene and Dr. Who Collins worth the price of admission? Absolutely. The children in peril plot of THREE trailers I could’ve done without. Thanks Cinemarkive just ditched my children to come to the movies and now I’m having a panic attack in the dark that they will get sick or die and become the undead. Seriously. Needed a warning for the trailers at a zombie movie! LOL All of that said I thoroughly enjoyed my date night and came home a much happier mama.

  24. kui says:

    I liked it. It’s a silly, fun movie that does not need to be taken seriously. Not too grotesque & not scary at all (i was worried because i hate zombie films for these reasons)I liked how in this adaptation ladies learn deadly arts, but the movie didn’t showcase this enough- MORE LENA HEADY! And I like Sam Riley as Mr Darcy. I love his voice. Mmmm, smoky. And his outfit. Mmmm, leather. I recommend it- and worst case scenario if you hate it, you’ll just have to give your brain a good scrubbing by putting on P&P with Matthew McFadyen as Mr Darcy so he can proclaim ‘I love, I love, I love you’ in the early morning light.

  25. Heidi Hamburg says:

    The trailer put me off in the first two seconds. I was offended by the carelessness of showing a clear fresh jet trail across the upper right corner of the sky.

    Now? After reading this? Maybe I’ll chance it.

  26. NomadiCat says:

    I dragged a friend out last night for Galentines and we had SUCH a good time. Our expectations were sufficiently low and we were delighted to find them exceeded.

    Matt Smith is the *best* Collins. I was fully down with the secret identity of the Antichrist. The costuming was excellent. And I never knew I’d been waiting my whole life to hear lines from Austen delivered with punches and kicks but I had actual chinhands during the sister’s sparring and Darcy’s first proposal scene.

    And in addition to having the best Collins, this movie did two other things better than any other adaptation: Worldbuilding, and making it clear to the audience just how dire the Bennett sisters’ circumstances are/ why it’s so dangerous for Lizzie to spurn Collins. I’m trying to teach P&P right now and both of those things are *hard* for a modern reader to get.

    Was this movie a terrible trainwreck? Absolutely. But it was a beautiful one and I appreciated that every member of the cast and crew committed 100% to the madness!

  27. Jennifer says:

    I love it! Definitely so bad it was good. My friend and I have been saying for years that this needs to be a movie. This was exactly what I expected – kinda sorta P&P with some zombie nonsense thrown in. I loved loved loved watching Lizzy turn down Darcy and then start kicking his ass. And as everyone else has said, Matt Smith was brilliant. He really managed to be socially awkward without being smarmy. I could tell who was a Jane Austin fan in the audience because we all laughed before Darcy jumped in the water. It got a little squicky in a few places, but I have a low tolerance for squick. It didn’t stop me from enjoying the movie.

    If you’re on the fence about going then I say get drinks first. We had margaritas.

  28. Kira J. Lane says:

    I’m still so torn on seeing this. Normally I’d be all for even a terrible adaptation of anything Austen but I’m definitely suffering from zombie fatigue.

  29. S. Alvarado says:

    Bahaha! I actually really enjoyed the movie. I just watched it today, and have been excited about it for months.

    I’d never wanted to read P&P, as all the snobbishness around it really irritated me. It had been some sort of “in” thing to claim to be a P&P fan, or an Austen fan. But, eventually, I got around to reading it and watching the BBC miniseries, and was actually very surprised how much I liked it. I came to the conclusion that a lot of the girls I knew in school who liked the book probably hadn’t understood half of it. But still, I enjoyed the reading and the watching.

    When P&P&Z came out, it took me forever to read it. I thought the first half was terribly slow, but the second half had me laughing so hard I was crying. I had finally found what I felt had been missing from Austen’s book, which was a sense of karmic justice delivered to the characters we love to hate. I was so perversely pleased with a paraplegic Wickham. The proposal fight scene, as well as the fight scene with Lady De Burgh gave me a deep sense of satisfaction.

    I was thrilled to see it brought to the big screen, even though I was 99% sure they would screw up both the content of the original Austen and the humor of the zombified version. I desperately hoped they wouldn’t turn it into a “horror” movie, as the zombies were not meant to be scary or intimidating in any sense of the word. But I was afraid it would be too bland, or too dry, or too…a hundred other things.

    I was so surprised at what I got. It wasn’t really P&P or P&P&Z. It was the normal bastardization of any novel-turned-movie, and somehow that made it even more hilarious. All the moments everyone says they loved, I loved.

    I laughed when Darcy uttered the line about the brightness of her eyes, I thought it was genius. I cracked up when Lizzie tried choking him with her garter-clad legs in anger over his horrific proposal. I thought Mr. Collins was delightfully awful in an unexpectedly loveable way. I, too, drooled over and then immediate coveted all the purple costuming elements. When Mrs. Bennett asked Lady De Burgh if her eye patch was for function or fashion, I rather think I was the only person in the theater cackling like a hyena.

    Personally, I’ve never truly felt any romance from the other versions of Darcy. I know, I know, everyone is always SWOONING over Darcy, but I’ve never been much convinced of the actual romance. This is one of the few times I actually felt like I enjoyed the romance aspects and not just the satire. I felt Lizzie’s concern for Darcy’s safety. I felt like I repeatedly saw the look on Darcy’s face that meant, “Bloody hell, it’s that girl again! Why do I like her so damn much?” And frankly, that impresses me, because I didn’t find the actor particularly attractive.

    I enjoyed watching Darcy riding behind Lizzie. I laughed when Jane knocked Bingley over, saving his life. And when facing that final horde, I turned to my husband and whispered, “I bet Jane shoves Bingley behind her to protect him.”

    I actually liked the blatant departure from the storyline with the movie-specific plot they added. I am sad that we didn’t get the paraplegic Wickham, the Caregiver-Lydia, the zombie-Charlotte…although I’m glad this Mr. Collins didn’t suicide. But once I understood the movie was deviating from the book, I just sat back and prepared to enjoy whatever they threw out there for what it was worth. And the way they engineered a climax with a rescue and a tiny bit of anguish (even though you knew he didn’t die), was just as good, actually.

    I think that’s the key to my enjoyment. I wouldn’t say my expectations were low, they just weren’t specifically attached to things like plot or dialogue. I’m the kind of person who will download several different covers to my favorite songs and appreciate them all for whatever differences they offer.

    P&P&Z was just a fun movie. I don’t even like zombies, never have. But I felt like I got what I paid for, and while I wouldn’t place it on any of my top ten lists, I would definitely watch it again. Just for fun.

  30. Tobu says:

    Late to the party here, but please don’t describe a frenetic/unfocused/dumb/badly-paced film as having ADHD. It’s insulting to readers with ADHD, and it perpetuates misconceptions about how the disorder works. (If anything, many people with ADHD would be more likely to run an interesting (to them) topic into the ground, repeatedly returning to it when the conversation tries to move on.) Thank you!

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top