Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

549. Spare by Prince Harry, with Melissa Blue

Spare
A | BN | K
Melissa Blue tweeted that she wanted to talk about Spare.

So did I! So, we did!

We talk about the book itself, but we also look at the book from our perspective as romance readers and writers, and also as a larger narrative about dismantling propaganda. As Melissa points out, narratives constructed around Meghan and Harry echo narratives we’ve seen about other people, especially women, in public life who are subjected to propaganda to undermine them.

I talk a lot about how dismissing romance ignores a lot of what romance says and does, and what it represents about people, about sexuality, and about relationships. I think the same is true about celebrity narratives: the public narrative, or the approved narrative, is also very distant from the messy, complicated reality, and this particular set of stories gives us a lot to think about and discuss.

Spice things up this Valentine’s day with the game Let’s Get Deep from the creators of What Do You Meme? and get 20% off with promo code SARAH at whatdoyoumeme.com/letsgetdeep.

Music: purple-planet.com

Read the transcript

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

You can find Melissa Blue at TheMelissaBlue.com, and on Twitter @Mel_TheGreat.

We also discussed The NY Times examination of Instagram followers and Kensington Royal bot accounts. 

 

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at [email protected] or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Click to view the transcript

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

Uncategorized

Add Your Comment →

  1. Buckett says:

    This is the first review/discussion I have read that does not focus on the salacious, but more on the outlien and overall purpose.
    Thanks for this 🙂 Much appreciated.
    I’m in the process of listenign to the audiobook, but finding it quite harrowing in places, so a little at a time, in small doses, so as to keep mentally safe.

  2. SB Sarah says:

    @Buckett: I listened as well and it is really a heartbreaking story at times. Thank you for the compliment! I am really proud of this episode.

  3. Jazzlet says:

    There are a few British media outlets that wouldn’t give final approval to the palace, but most of them, like the Guardian, are not that interested in having interviews with the Royals. The Guardian is far more interested in how they do exert power, because all legislation that might affect them or their extensive holdings goes to the monarch and the heir for approval before it goes to Parliment, something we (the public) didn’t know until the Guardian did a series on it. This means for instance that most employment legislation doesn’t apply to them, which was why Charles was able to sack all of those staff when the Queen died; unlike most British workers they had no right to either notice or pay in lieu of notice. I could go on, but you’d need dozens of posts to cover all their fucked up shit.

    But I absolutely believe that they are a bunch of racist slugs – I was going to say dinosaurs, but dinosaurs are cool, and whatever the RHS says slugs are not cool.

  4. SB Sarah says:

    @Jazzlet: Yes, you’re right, definitely not all of them. And my GOSH the things the series revealed, like how exempt they are from a lot of employment laws. WTF. Spare (lol) me the mouth noises about how they aren’t or can’t be political, because the family absolutely is.

  5. Pamala says:

    I already gushed about this podcast on Patreon but thought I’d let my thoughts be known here as well. Melissa and Sarah did such a magnificent job of breaking down the three parts of the narrative. And for all of the pre-published leaks, it wasn’t nearly as scathing as they made it out to be. Even though you can tell he’s heartbroken about the state of his relationships with his father and his brother, he reserves almost ALL THE SMOKE for the tabloid press. And who can blame him–They’ve used him as fodder and filler for years.

    The part where M & S talk about him working (besides being a soldier, which they wouldn’t allow him to make that a career), it’s eye-opening that he’s basically raised to be like a Regency-era gentleman. Work or trade is beneath you. But Meghan shows up and rolls up her sleeves, probably leaves emails for the staff about what she wants to accomplish and probably asking questions about how to get that done, and she’s labeled a bully. I just cannot with those folks and I’m happy that Harry escaped with Meghan and the kids.

    The latest furor is about whether or not they’ll come to the Coronation. Another friend and I were speculating and she said she that if they go, she hopes:

    1) they sit at the very back of the church so all the rubberneckers and paparazzi keep swiveling between KCIII at the front and M&H at the back
    2) that they bolt as soon as it’s over, thus the idealized seating at the back so they can go celebrate Archie’s birthday and skip the long lenses trying to capture them outside the balcony at the palace
    3) they then leave the UK forever or until KCIII dies

  6. Honestly, when I finished the book I thought that if you have to have a monarchy, well, Harry’s more fit for the position than either his brother or his father.

    The other piece? In an earlier generation, Harry would have been the prince in charge of the military, and done dang well at it.

    But damn. What a freaking bunch of entitled, dysfunctional people. He and Meghan are better off out of it.

  7. Philly says:

    Thank you for your thoughtful and insightful discussion of this book within the historical context of this narrative. Well done.

  8. Misty says:

    As an avid horse enthusiast, I mainly remembered how badly he treats his polo horses before reading this book. What I got out of it was how deeply traumatized person he is, and while certainly good part of it is because of his upbringing in a suffocating family and his mother’s death, he really needs to actively try to find tools to deal with his traumas. I hope he doesn’t use Meghan as a crutch tbh. She certainly got way more than she bargained for with the marriage. Hopefully over time they get to live more peaceful life the way they wanted.

  9. Glen says:

    I have not read the book, but I think this is the best review yet.

    Having grown up with a narcissistic parent (and Charles and William line up with the definition of a narcissist; I don’t know how one would raise someone to be a monarch without creating a narcissist), I think the kind of reconciliation that Harry wants is impossible – C & W are incapable of viewing other people as fully autonomous human beings (they mostly hide this behind pomp and inane rules, but it slips out, like Charles’ pen incident). To apologize the way H wants, C & W would have to accept that H has a right to his own views, and they literally can’t because to do so would blow up their own world view as well as the whole foundation of the monarchy (a double whammy). Personally, it took me into my 40’s to realize that my parent was incapable of seeing me as someone who could make my own choices and therefore was never going to stop criticizing me repeatedly for doing so, much less apologize.

    Based on the temper-tantrums that Meghan’s step-family keeps having, she obviously has experience dealing with narcissists. (I think Doria protected M from it as a child, but getting a clear view of M’s history is nearly impossible due to all the anti-M propaganda, everything’s contested.)

  10. HeatherS says:

    I would never read this book on the basis of “celebrity/royal bio”, as that’s not my bag, but you’ve sold me on it as a deconstruction of propaganda and what living life under the paparazzi microscope from day 1, through the loss of seemingly the only loving person in your life as a child, can do to a person.

    I’m adding it to my TBR.

  11. Bona says:

    I live in a country with a constitutiinal monarchy. So my POV is diferent. Being a royal is not the same as being a celebrity. It’s a constitutional institution, like congress or the supreme court.You have to be sensible, poised, never complain about your life, because it is a privileged one and it’s all about your duty to the people not about you and your feelings and emotions. Considering this, it’s obvious that Henry Windsor did never want to act as a Royal, he doesn’t want to be as princess Ann, for instance. His problem is not who he married, there are foreigners and common and even PoC in other royal families. And all of them had difficulties adapting to the new roles, but they are loyal to the institution and have developed their own voices, giving their efforts and their time to their countries. His problem is, as far as I see when I listen to him, or read this book, that he wanted the good parts of being a royal but not the bad parts. And believe me, the spare have always more freedom and less duties than the heir or heiress. Now Henry has no constitutional role in the UK and that’s the best thing for him and his family. He is just a very unhappy person who does not get on well with his family, and I think that should remain in the private sphere. The dignified silence of the British royals is the only good answer to this book. At least from the institutional POV.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top