Book Review

Hello Stranger by Lisa Kleypas

UPDATE: An updated version of Hello Stranger has been released digitally to all retailers, and updated copies should have appeared in digital libraries. The scene in question described below has been removed entirely from the book.

I had been waiting so impatiently for Hello Stranger to come, mostly because the heroine is inspired by the first female British physician, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson. And I was so mad that it let me down. Why did it let me down? Because of a brief section I am calling: “The Bullshit” (we’ll get to what that is in a minute). Had it not been for The Bullshit, I would have enjoyed this book immensely, which makes me even more bitter about it.

Dr. Garrett Gibson is the only female physician in England. From her earlier interactions with him in a previous novel, she’s sometimes watched over by Ethan Ransom, a former Scotland Yard Detective turned spy, who pines for Garrett from a distance and wants to protect her. Ethan has a dangerous job, so he doesn’t want to involve Garrett in his life, but he’s also kind of in love with her, so instead he just follows her around like a making sure no one hurts her (even though she’s pretty capable of defending herself). This is Romance Hero Logic at its finest.

When the book opens, Garrett is attacked by a group of men intending to rape her, and Ethan jumps in to help her beat the stuffing out of them. Then he offers to teach her self defense more styled to street fighting versus the formal style of instruction she’s received in the past. She agrees and when they’re sparring he gets a boner and Garrett realizes she wants to have an affair with him.

Garrett can’t conceive of a world where she can have a husband and still be allowed to keep her practice but she also wants to experience sex and romance. So she suggests to Ethan that they engage in an affair and he’s all like “No, my life is way to dangerous to involve you in,” and then They Bone Anyway and Feels are Had.

Add to that a big conspiracy Ethan is struggling to unravel which makes for a good suspense subplot, and Garrett being the only person who can save his life

Click for spoilers!
after he’s shot

and that all sounds good right?

It is good. It’s a sexy romance between two working class people (not in a ballroom), with a cool, proficient, badass heroine and a great suspense plotline.

It’s got great writing. Take for example this sentence, describing how Ethan feels about Garrett: “The mere thought of her left him like a stray coal on the hearth.”

So this book should have made me really happy, but instead it pissed me off because of The Bullshit.

The Bullshit, you see, is a brief section wherein Ethan explains that he learned all about smexing from an unnamed woman of color while in India as part of his spy training.

Gently he murmured in the hollow space just behind her earlobe, guessing at what would excite or intrigue her. “In India, before a man marries, he’s taught how to please his wife according to ancient texts on the erotic arts. He learns about embraces, kisses, strokes, and bites that bring fulfillment.”

“Bites?” she asked dazedly.

“Love bites, darlin’. Nothing that would hurt you.” To demonstrate, he bent to her neck and nibbled softly. She made an agitated sound and arched toward him. “Tis said the joining of two who are well-matched is a high union,” he whispered. “And if they come so intoxicated by love as to leave faint marks on the skin, their passion for each other will not be lessened even in one hundred years.”

Garrett’s voice was wobbly. “Did you learn any of those erotic arts?”

His lips curved against her skin. “Aye, but I’m still a novice. I only know one hundred and twenty positions.”

“A hundred and…” She broke off as he let two fingers slide gently between the soft lips of her sex, teasing back and forth. After a convulsive swallow, she managed to say, ” I doubt that’s anatomically possible.”

His lips grazed the edge of her jaw. “You’re the medical expert,” he mocked gently. “Who am I to argue?”

She squirmed as one of his fingertips wiggled through soft curls and came to rest on an acutely sensitive place. “Who taught you?” she managed to ask.

“A woman in Calcutta. I’d never met her before. For the first two nights, there was no physical contact at all. We sat on bamboo mats on the floor and talked.”

“About what?” She stared at him with dilated eyes, her flush deepening as he continued to fondle the silky, intricate shape of her.

“The first night she explained about Kama…a word for desire and longing. But it also refers to the well-being of the soul and senses…the appreciation of beauty, art, nature. The second night we talked about pleasures of the body. She said if a man was a true male, he would use the rule of his will to cherish the woman, and fulfill her so thoroughly she would have no desire left for another.”

On the third night, she had undressed him and pulled his hand to her body, whispering, “Women, being of a tender nature, want tender beginnings.”

So let’s talk about how damaging this passage is.

  1. It’s basically the definition of Orientalism.
  2. The woman who Ethan describes has no name. She has one speaking line that exists in his memory. She is not a character, nor a person. She’s a prop. She is intended purely as a tool for his learning the sexytimes. It’s prime Bullshit: dehumanizing and racist.
  3. The fetishizing of people of color as inherently more sexual than White people is a big fucking problem. It contributes to the rape culture we live in RIGHT NOW in which women of color are even less likely to report or see justice for sexual assault than White women are.

I mean, let’s think about the anonymous woman above. She’s got no name as previously mentioned. She doesn’t really speak. She’s a nameless Indian woman who is full of sexual knowledge who is there to teach sex to the hero. She’s living in a country COLONIZED BY WHITE MEN. She’s not a person. She’s a thing he gets to fuck. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

And while all racism is Bullshit, this is especially Dangerous Bullshit because it perpetuates that idea that women of color are nameless, identity-less beings that White men get to have sex with because they’re just so sexual in nature. Ethan then takes his sexual knowledge from this woman of color and brings it to his White one-true-love. This woman’s culture and knowledge exist only in service to the White hero.

So why is this woman even there? For sex. She’s just there for sex, not as a person or a character. There’s no focus on her thoughts, her feelings, her voice, her body.  That is rape culture targeted at women of color.

So yeah, I would have liked this book immensely, except for the giant turd in the middle of it that made me rage type a thousand words. I look to romance for depictions of women enjoying healthy, fulfilling relationships, not racist stereotyping.

Update 1 March 2018: a note from Lisa Kleypas

In my life, I’ve had a lot to learn AND unlearn. All I can say is, I’m sorry. Thank you for helping me to understand the lack of awareness I had about this issue. Obviously I would never want to hurt anyone by perpetuating an offensive stereotype, especially about women from a culture I respect so tremendously, and I feel terrible about it.

I will make changes to the book immediately, so all future editions will be culturally sensitive and mindful of how every single character is portrayed. Thank you again for making me aware of this and teaching me something I needed to understand, both as an author and as a person.

Sincerely, Lisa  

This book is available from:
  • Available at Amazon
  • Order this book from apple books

  • Order this book from Barnes & Noble
  • Order this book from Kobo
  • Order this book from Google Play

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well. Thanks!

Hello Stranger by Lisa Kleypas

View Book Info Page

Comments are Closed

  1. KtB says:

    Damn it.
    I’m mad at myself that I probably wouldn’t have thought anything about the passage you highlighted…because isn’t that the problem in a nutshell? Getting so used to inappropriate things that we shrug them off.
    I’m sure I will still read and enjoy the rest of the book, but I think I will take the time to write a fan letter voicing my concern over her choice of adding that scene. And as always, thank you, Elyse, for bringing to light issues that need to be addressed.
    You guys are my heroes.

  2. Lizzy says:

    God fucking damn it.

    I was looking forward to this book. I’m so tired of casual dehumanization of people of color, trans people, queer “best friends”, etc, etc in romance. It, along with rape, pull me straight out of the story and ruin books that I was really liking up to that point. It’s not hard to not write stereotypes of cultures. Just stop. Please.

  3. Becky says:

    Thank you for pointing this out. I am still learning to see such things and probably would not have noticed which makes me disappointed in myself for something I didn’t actually do!?!?!

  4. Lora says:

    *vomit*
    Thank you for the warning so I don’t have to download this book, read it, then damage my kindle by throwing it against the wall while screaming.

  5. Sandyh says:

    Thank you for calling this out. I love the honesty in your review.

  6. Heather T says:

    ARGH — you would think that after this great review and fantastic discussion in the commentary ABOUT THE SAME FREAKING PROBLEM, we wouldn’t be seeing this anymore. http://smartbitchestrashybooks.com/reviews/someone-love-mary-balogh/

  7. EP says:

    Damm, Damm, Damm and a bit more Damm! I had this book on pre-order from the library, cos I was really looking forward to reading Garrett’s story. Now, hell to the No. I’ve cancelled my hold and feel vaguely icky after reading that review.

  8. Suleikha Snyder says:

    Thank you., Elyse. I’ve seen dozens of gushing reviews from readers since the book dropped. This is the first time, outside of Twitter, that I’ve seen anyone address these issues. And, sadly, I think it’s as a few commenters outlined above: People just don’t notice. Sexualized Asian women as backstory for the hero is a matter of course in historical romance. With no thought to how racism or colonialism created those conditions and take agency away from the women involved. We are just props. A generalized exotic India.

    When I was a teen, I used to gravitate toward ANY historicals that mentioned India because I was so hungry to see even a HINT of my culture in a romance. Prop? Wallpaper? I was so desperate that I didn’t care how we were portrayed. I just wanted to be seen. Twenty-five years later…I want better. We deserve better.

  9. Jennifer in GA says:

    When I read that part, I thought we (the audience) were supposed to understand how wrong it was, because was part of the overall training Ethan received from Jenkyn, which was more than a little warped and messed up?

  10. glk says:

    I had the same reaction. And aside from perpetuating stereotypes, it also is a missed opportunity and lack of imagination!! So many interesting stories could be told about feminism and class in relation to colonialism—and here it’s right there given the subplot about Irish Home Rule. What about this version:

    The (Irish!) Ethan is sent to India by his empire-defending boss only to be politically (rather than sexually) awakened, and with some chapters of flashbacks to India complete with developed Indian characters. This could set up a sequel about the collaboration between Irish and Indian anti-imperialist radicals… I would totally read that. I want to read that!

  11. Groovymarlin says:

    Holy s**balls. Way to ruin what sounds like an otherwise interesting romance. What the hell, Lisa Kleypas?

  12. Amanda says:

    Was looking forward to this book, but I think I’ll skip it now. I’m not sure I would be able to read it knowing that this gross nonsense is in there.

    ALSO, would like to respond to user glk: I would read the crap out of this theoretical book you describe. I am so here for political historical romance novels, especially when it deals with dismantling colonialism.

  13. Alexandra says:

    I’m not very far into the book but I got nervous about the orientalism when Ethan started talking about his super special (fighting) training in India, it reminded me of the similar problem in Mary Balogh’s Someone to Love. I’m hoping this ends up being something Kleypas can learn from because I do like her writing.

    And I don’t want to pile on but this book also made me realize how much I hate *spoilers for first chapter* situations where a woman has training and is proficient at something but a man has to come along and show her that he’s definitely better than she is and she doesn’t even realize how much her training is lacking. I feel like “teaching the lady to fight” isn’t uncommon in romance novels and I like it when the lady has no training, but I’d love it if the next time the heroine defends herself and the hero comes smarming in and gives a condescending, “Try and hit me,” she beats the crap out of him. Or at least does an effective attack and hits him with it not being a lucky shot. I want heroines who are written to be competent in fighting to actually be competent without the hero having to swoop in and show her how she should really be doing things. I feel like if you’re going to write a heroine who has in the past sought out training to fight, make her able to fight and be a bad ass before the hero comes along.

  14. Hazel says:

    How disappointing.

    Thank you, Elyse, for calling out bullshit. It’s not that long ago that Orientalism was entirely the norm, and writers didn’t give it a second thought.

    At work I’ve just completed some training on unconscious bias. I understand that US researchers, (see Harvard Implicit Association Test) have been saying that most of us harbour biases that we’re unaware of. If I understand correctly, the claim is that simply recognising our bias can lead to a sizeable reduction in its impact. I need to actively work at this issue in my professional life. I have tried one of the tests online and was not surprised, but chagrined to find that I’m not as ‘enlightened’ as I’d like to think.

    I would encourage others to take a look and consider the scientific evidence about the irrational and biased ways we think, without realising that we’re doing it.

  15. bgs says:

    As a WOC, I’ve always, always appreciated how active SBTB has been in calling out things like this because this is not first time this convo has come up.I’ll just say this is not some rookie writer, so I’m less willing to overlook how lazy and unimaginative this stereotype is.

    And I want to applaud people like S. Snyder, A. Rai, C. Milan, KJ Charles, A. Cole (and several others I can’t remember off the top of my head) for showing that intersectional understanding and depth is possible in various romance genres. Your books make me feel seen (rather than erased) and gave me a space to dream, escape, and fantasize. Thank you.

    @glk: What a fab idea!!! Write that book please!!!! And I’m happy to help with the research (psych grad student, so research is my job!)

    @Hazel: You’re speaking my language with your IAT talk 😉 There is tons of research out there on biases, stereotypes, prejudices (so much so, it’s hard for new researchers to carve out their own niche), but I’ve learnt that encouragement is a start, but people usually need some incentive/motivation/reason to start addressing their biases. I’m glad to hear you found yours, but we still need keep the fight going 🙂

  16. SB Sarah says:

    I’ve updated the review with a note from Lisa, which I am also posting here:

    In my life, I’ve had a lot to learn AND unlearn. All I can say is, I’m sorry. Thank you for helping me to understand the lack of awareness I had about this issue. Obviously I would never want to hurt anyone by perpetuating an offensive stereotype, especially about women from a culture I respect so tremendously, and I feel terrible about it.

    I will make changes to the book immediately, so all future editions will be culturally sensitive and mindful of how every single character is portrayed. Thank you again for making me aware of this and teaching me something I needed to understand, both as an author and as a person.

    Sincerely, Lisa  

  17. Suleikha Snyder says:

    I just legitimately started crying.

  18. Sure Thing says:

    I agree with both of Suleikha’s comments.

    Lisa Kleypas stepping up is really important.

    Immense thanks to Elyse for the review.

  19. Hazel says:

    Wow. I am bowled over.

    Respect.

  20. Lara says:

    Thank you for both the spoiler warning (that scene would have made me shriek in outrage and fling the book into an oubliette) and for updating with Lisa’s statement. Now I can read it without wincing, and knowing that one of my favorite authors will step up.

  21. 89sputnik says:

    Hi all the way from Hyderabad, India.huge fan of this site by the way. Thank you. After reading this review I felt the need to clarify few things.Brits please don’t get offended.

    Courtesans were highly respected in India before the British landed on her shores. Like minded men all over the town/city used to gather and discuss politics science art etc while these courtesans entertained them with their wit, hospitality etc.i read somewhere that there were debates held in such entertainment centers and even free meals were provided to the poor.

    After the advent of the East India company and later on when India was under the British rule, courtesans were deemed prostitutes and whores. and laws were passed to make such say institutions were blacklisted and were made illegal.

    Of course courtesans were mistresses primarily but there was more to them then provide sex.

    Okay. Done with my rant.

  22. Marissa says:

    Wow. That author response resulted in my purchase.

  23. KtB says:

    Wow! How nice of Lisa Kleypas to respond!

    But I can’t help but wonder (and correct me if I’m wrong) but shouldn’t an editor have caught this?
    It’s not like the fabulous Ms. Kleypas publishes straight to the internet. Isn’t that what editing services can help with? I’m seriously asking because The Bitchery does know all. 🙂

  24. Sue says:

    Oh noooooooooooooooo. I had been looking forward to this book for SO LONG. I *love* a good pining from afar (especially/only when it’s the hero doing the pining). I loooove books about old tymey medicine and pioneering female physicians. This book was 1000% going to be my catnip. I am very thankful to Elyse for reading the book and providing such a frank and incisive critique, and for speaking up.

    Sarah and Elyse: any plans to re-review the book if the edits do happen? I don’t think I’ll be buying or borrowing this book until that happens, if it does.

  25. Jen says:

    Look, I’m glad Lisa stepped up. But honestly given that this is also the day that The Ripped Bodice diversity report came out, none of us should be surprised. When publishing is all white, it’s not just that authors of color *aren’t* published, it’s *also* that tremendously problematic representation makes it out into the world.

    This is Lisa Kleypas! She’s one of the most beloved and well-known authors of romance. If she isn’t getting the best possible editing and support and this shit is making it through, then MANY, MANY, MANY romances have stuff that is just as problematic. And it’s not just this book. It’s every Sheikh romance, it’s every romance set in a big city with an all white cast, etc.

    I’m glad she’s changing it for future books, but this is an entire industry that supports these white-centered narratives. If we as white readers and reviewers aren’t calling this out every time we see it, nothing will change. I’m very grateful to the Smart Bitches for this review, but they can’t review everything. This is something We all need to be working on, and something that white readers need to do for each other. We can’t expect readers/authors of color to be the only ones who do this work and who care about it.

  26. Nang Nelson says:

    I was actually 2/3 done with the book when I read this review and I’m glad the problematic scene was called out. Frankly it was completely superfluous and added nothing to the story or characterization (actually detracted from it IMO) – it’s fine that the hero of a romance novel is good in bed, really no need to have some weird orientalist explanation why. I’m Asian and fairly cringed when I read that scene which was supposed to be sexy (nope!). I did finish the book because it’s LK and she can really write. And I’m happy to see her response to it. Racist stereotype aside, I did like all the historical details and Garrett’s toughness/intelligence,but felt the book lacked sexual tension and definitely needed to be read as part of a series because Garrett and Ethan have a history that spans the previous books (which is always slightly annoying to me).

  27. Critterbee says:

    I think that we need more woke people in the publishing world, and more diversity.

  28. Chef Cheyenne says:

    Wait. Honestly confused. How is thisvdifferent from all the stuff about unique Celtic violence sexuality? Or other mass identifiers and cultural identifiers. Most hero’s are Anglo tall dark handsome and fit. Like Whitehouse former advisor and abuser Rob porter. Vampires are rarely ugly powerful and seductive. There is a huge difference between intentional destructive racism and mild character definition. Sit down. Relax and wait for bigger fights. Ps we haven’t even started with all the massive issues on social evonommic classism…..

  29. Jen says:

    VAMPIRES AREN’T REAL. Multiple women have talked in the comment about how this kind of representation harms them. You don’t get to tell people to relax and sit down about their own feelings.

  30. Betsy says:

    Elyse- thank you & great call.
    LK- thanks for immediate response.
    I await the new edition.
    Smart Bitches keep up the good work.

  31. Lucy says:

    The review was more than enough to turn me off on its own, but thanks GLK for the warning about the Irish issue too – I’m Irish and can honestly say I can count on half a hand the number of times I’ve read a fiction book (generally by English or American authors) that hasn’t made me angry because of (a) tired stereotypes of Irish people (b) geographical ignorance (c) political ignorance or (d) all of the above. So, I can now add this book to the Get Tae Fuck list.
    Authors, hold yourself to higher standards please. If you’re going to include something of which you have no personal experience such as a particular culture or race or nationality, do some research. It’s your job.

  32. Lucy says:

    Just saw the response from Lisa Kleypas – I think a lot of people (*cough* mostly men *cough*) could take some tips on how to apologise from her. Now, that’s a good apology.

  33. F says:

    @Chef Cheyenne… really? You’re gonna tell people of color to sit down? The stereotypes perpetuated by this type of representation is harmful to POC. How can you know that? BECAUSE WE ARE TELLING YOU. The author listened, and wants to learn.

    But you tell us to sit down when we speak about being hurt. That is intentional racism.

  34. Kass says:

    I liked this novel, though much more because of Garrett’s than Ethan’s story. However, I am quite stunned that, even if I found his travel in India background uninteresting (not crucial to the story either) I had not realized how biased (i.e. sexist and racist) it can be read. I feel disappointed with myself for not noticing this.

    Besides the very good review of Elise on the subject, I do admire Lisa Kleypas’ comment and her will to overcome/change that part of her novel. It takes courage and humility to say what she said. I look forward to the new edition.

  35. devra says:

    this was already DNF for me before i caught this review, but i appreciate elyse’s honesty and i also appreciate lisa’s response.

    my major complaint really echoes @alexandra’s above:

    “I’d love it if the next time the heroine defends herself and the hero comes smarming in and gives a condescending, “Try and hit me,” she beats the crap out of him. Or at least does an effective attack and hits him with it not being a lucky shot. I want heroines who are written to be competent in fighting to actually be competent without the hero having to swoop in and show her how she should really be doing things. I feel like if you’re going to write a heroine who has in the past sought out training to fight, make her able to fight and be a bad ass before the hero comes along.”

    YES YES YES YES YES PLEASE K THX
    i so badly wanted garrett’s response to be to kick his ass and felt so let down when she didn’t.

  36. Kris Bock says:

    Regarding the editing issue – yes, every traditionally published book should have an editor, a copy editor, and a proofreader. But they are not typically trained to look for this kind of thing. And they may be less likely to speak up when it’s a popular, successful author. They know the book will sell, and they don’t want to do anything to annoy the author so she’ll go to a different publisher. Still, it would be nice if all publishers passed all books past trained sensitivity readers to look for inadvertent offenses. The author could still be given the choice to leave it in if she thinks it’s important or relevant, but I expect most authors would be happy to avoid problems such as this. And over time, they would probably learn not to put the offencive passages in in the first place.

  37. Susan says:

    And here I was all bothered that there wasn’t a comma after “Hello” in the title. Instead of a sexy “Hello, Stranger” it comes off more as Hello Kitty.

  38. LyndaX says:

    Okay. Okay. I get it, and thank you for pointing this out. But is the whole point that this was an Indian woman who had no name, etc.? How many romances have there been where the hero’s sexual education was given by a nameless white woman who was a courtesan? Tons! Given the lack of availability of sexual ed materials in the past, anyone who was proficient had to have had education (formal or informal) with a teacher (even a former lover) which would have meant a woman who probably was a prostitute. Because of cultural differences, I did not assume that the Indian teacher was a prostitute, even though she would have been seen as one by 99% of the British. It doesn’t seem as if the hero saw her as such, but as his teacher who helped him a lot. Most romances, even today, show the man as sexually aware and proficient, education received before the heroine. If that education came from a prostitute, most of the time, she is nameless and faceless. Given that this novel takes place in Victorian England, it is not an insult, nor an example of racism to show Indians as being more open about sex than the English. Practically the whole world was–outside of England and her influence. Yes, you can argue that it’s a stereotyped portrayal, but that’s hardly a sin. Also, given the setting (in bed with another woman, our heroine), would it really have been better if: 1. the woman’s name had been given 2. Ethan had talked about how she was an individual, not “just an Indian” to him 3. she had been a British widow instead? Hardly romantic, at best: distracting.

    Readers complain that romances are too often of Regency innocent misses with roguish dukes, but when an author varies it a little, she gets an F (an F! Really?) on the basis mainly of a page or two! Oh, how awful to show India as exotic and different from the British! Orientalism! Oh, dear! If, instead, Kleypas had shown the Indians as just like the English, she would have been accused as racist and dismissive. Archetypes (a stereotype with an education) like the man rescuing the woman exist for a reason. As we all know, romances are fantasy, and beating up three men who are trying to rape you may be more healthy (although I’d argue against it), but not only is it unrealistic, it’s also unromantic. Of course, it’s sexist that in fantasy (and I’d argue in reality too) woman would be drawn to the man who can and readily does protect her.

    I’m sorry, but I think from your review that your F is not warranted. I suspect that Kleypas’s graceful apology and her vow to remove that scene from future books was because she is a businesswoman and recognizes a fight she cannot win. Of course, it’s possible, that she came to see the situation through your eyes, and I’m wrong. Either way, her apology is smart and may be heart-felt.

  39. JoAnn says:

    Elyse, will you be writing a review for the amended edition?
    I am disappointed in myself for not even recognizing this and thank you for bringing it to our attention. I really liked this book! I feel Ms Kleypas was swift and honest with her apology – kudos to her for that.

  40. Suleikha Snyder says:

    Oh, how awful to show India as exotic and different from the British! Orientalism! Oh, dear! If, instead, Kleypas had shown the Indians as just like the English, she would have been accused as racist and dismissive.

    Guess what, LyndaX? It IS awful. Because there is not enough portrayal of Indians in historical romance as anything besides mysterious sexual beings who hand out the Kama Sutra to everybody that walks by. I’d kill for “just like the English.” Or, you know, “just like actual people.” What a novel concept!

    Again and again and again, we come across these stereotypes. That colonialism was just an avenue for our sexuality to educate the West.

    In the excerpted bit from Hello Stranger, LK has Ethan asserting that Indian men were taught how to please women before their weddings. What Indian men? Bengalis? Gujaratis? Hindus? Muslims? If all this sexual knowledge was flying around, it sure didn’t last into the 20th century — unless my family’s copy of Kama Sutra got lost in a move! It’s a ridiculous generalization with no basis. The only reason it’s there is to justify Ethan’s skills.

    It’s not JUST that an Indian woman taught Ethan about sex. It’s that this is all historical romance authors think India is good for. This and tea. And Ethan’s fighting skills from a guru! Can’t forget that!

    I’m just thankful that Lisa Kleypas is listening, learning, and committing to change. I hope more authors — and readers — follow suit.

Comments are closed.

↑ Back to Top