Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

738. Isn’t He Romantic with Adib Khorram

Isn't he romantic by Adib Khorram an illustration of a bald man in a green suit dancing with an asian man with a floppy haircut against a skylineAdib Khorram’s new book, Isn’t He Romantic, is out this week, so of course I wanted to ask many questions about it.

This is the third in a trilogy about three queer Iranian American friends, and our conversation touches on some of the themes of the book, such as aging and ageism in the gay community, reclaiming fun games from your youth, and about trends in m/m romance currently.

❤ Read the transcript ❤

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

You can find Adib Khorram on his website, AdibKhorram.com!

We also mentioned:

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

❤ More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at sbjpodcast@gmail.com or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

❤ Click to view the transcript ❤

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

General Bitching...

Add Your Comment →

  1. Michael I says:

    The link seems to be going to last week’s podcast.

  2. @SB Sarah says:

    Between putting Friday Videos up on Thursday and grabbing the wrong link, I am on a ROLL Over here. All fixed – sorry!

  3. Michael I says:

    Also the link (in the “here are the books we discuss” section) that is supposed to go to “Isn’t He Romantic?” actually goes to a box set of “The Curse and the Crown” series.

  4. @SB Sarah says:

    We’re all fine over here. Just fine. All fixed. 🙂

  5. Rachel says:

    Oh I love the Rihanna-umbrella-shopping idea. I hereby nominate Tom Holland to take her here – https://www.james-smith.co.uk/ – preferably on a very, very rainy day. x

  6. N says:

    Will there be a transcript for this one?

  7. @SB Sarah says:

    Absolutely. It’s in progress right now!

  8. @SB Sarah says:

    The transcript has arrived!

  9. Kareni says:

    That was an enjoyable conversation, so thank you, Sarah and Adib. And thank you, garlicknitter, for the transcript.

  10. HeatherS says:

    Okay, can we really lean into the brief but IMPORTANT discussion of romance craft over romance marketing? Because YES. I’ve been feeling lately like I’ve been seeing a ton of trope labels slapped on books but the actual writing of romances has been not good. Plot is poorly developed, characters are flat, I’m feeling stupider for reading it, and the book just isn’t satisfying. Stop setting up plot points and then not developing them or just glossing over them! Ugh, I just feel frustrated because I’m reading a lot of fan fiction that is much better than published books I’ve paid actual money for. (Props to those fanfic authors for their skills. These paid authors need to take notes.)

    I don’t want to have to go back and read older romances because we know that can be a minefield, but a lot of current authors need to up their craft game, especially those who started writing because they started reading romance and then writing it during/post-COVID. I’ve also seen some TikTok thing where apparently, it’s not uncommon for people to only read the dialogue in books and skip the rest and that’s bizarre to me, but it also feels like those are the people these authors are writing for.

  11. @SB Sarah says:

    Oh, hey, it’s time for another of Sarah’s Half Baked Theories – I’ve been pondering this one for awhile and would love your thoughts.

    Your comment about readers only reading the dialogue supports my HBT that for some folks, reading is a second screen. I’ve seen a few articles and comments (this Guardian article is from Jan 2025) that big streamers like Netflix are commissioning scripts with the assumption that the tv is the second screen folks are paying attention to, the first being their phones. The scripts are meant to be very obvious, with clear tropes and motivations, and the characters restate the conflict all the time (“We can’t let grandma’s car wash/cupcake bakery/bar and grill close!”) to remind the folks who are watching but really paying half attention.

    I am wondering if reading has similarly become a second screen activity and some books are aimed for that purpose. Skimming, reading only the dialogue, perhaps expecting the motivation restated and the tropes to be very prominent all seem to support the idea that some books are being written for an audience that is half paying attention. I know I’ve stopped reading a few books because I felt like I was being fed the plot with a ladle. One book restated the conflict or the motivation at the end of every chapter and I was so bored. Thinking about whether some books are aimed at readers who aren’t paying full attention made sense of some of these trends I’ve noticed.

    Again, this is an HBT, so I welcome your perspective.

  12. Sandra says:

    @SB Sarah: It could be that the authors who are writing this way are writing what they know. This is their lifestyle — one eye on a phone at all times, only half their attention on whatever else is going on. Then that carries over into their writing choices.

    Writing to tropes and SEO is the other part. It seems that most books are almost fungible. There’s nothing to distinguish one from another. Readers who are paying only partial attention probably don’t even notice. I wonder, too, how much is AI crap. Feed it some tropes and a bare-bones plot and call it done.

    I’m a dinosaur. I’m not on social media, and my phone is a tool that I use when I need it. When I read, I read. When I watch TV, I watch TV. My focus is on what I’m currently doing. I wonder if this about to become a lost art, and if we’re going to be the worse for it.

  13. @SB Sarah says:

    Sandra, this is such a good analysis my mind is blown. Thank you.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top