Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

537. Romance Cliche Throwdown with Amanda

Ready, set: CLICHÉ.

Amanda and I are facing off in a romance cliché battle!

What does that even mean? I know, my brain is a very silly place.

Can you out-cliché the two of us? The Heat will be on!

What’s your favorite or least favorite romance cliché? Tell us all about it!

Music: purple-planet.com

Read the transcript

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

We also mentioned:

deep pink peonies next to Hot Dog the Meat Dragon

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at [email protected] or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Click to view the transcript

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

Uncategorized

Add Your Comment →

  1. Mikey says:

    Least favorite? The big misunderstanding. I get why it’s used–every argument or fight implies that the two people don’t get along, which of course isn’t the impression you want to give if they’re supposed to be a perfect romantic couple.

    So a Big Misunderstanding means that there’s no real disagreement, just a misunderstanding, that’s all. And the two lovers actually fit together as great as burgers and fries. But so often, it makes them look like idiots for not talking to each other.

    (It’s even more frustrating when they do talk and still don’t understand that there’s been a misunderstanding. The ONLY case that did that somewhat well was the first Shrek movie.)

    Favorite trope: The grudging admission to oneself of being in love. You know the kind. Like “I guess I am in love with him. DAMN it.”

  2. HeatherS says:

    My friend and coworker started a BTS book club in our public library system. She is a huge BTS fan and books that BTS have been seen reading, books by South Korean authors in translation, and the like are all on the club reading list. So yes, BTS is actually a way to sell books/get people to read.

    Big Misunderstandings really get on my nerves if it’s something that could easily be solved by using our words and communicating like grown ups, instead of expecting people to read each other’s minds or making assumptions like an idiot. Use. Your. Words.

    Ugh, there are books I want to mention but they’re all part of the strike world, so I won’t because supporting the workers. HarperCollins, get your stuff sorted – and by sorted, I mean pay the people who create and edit and design and market your books so you can rake in the cash.

  3. Glen says:

    While I don’t mind twee town names (Blue Moon is my fave, although the books get a bit over the top toward the end of the series), I do like a good pun. Still trying to figure out how to pronounce “Tilikum” in Claire Kingsley’s Bailey Brothers series. Til-i-kum? Ti-lik-um? Ti-li-kum? One of these days I’ll break down and get an audiobook to find out.

    I think the Horan Dogs name was supposed to be a joke, since it came from Niall’s monologue when he filled in for Jimmy Kimmel. And Nialler is what the Directioners call him, so that doesn’t work either. (Sorry – went down a rabbit hole after seeing Lewis Capaldi on the Graham Norton show, which led to the Niall-Lewis bromance, which led to learning more about Niall Horan than I want to admit to. Apparently Lewis’s fans are big fat sexy jungle cats, lol.)

  4. Vasha says:

    The “electricity” thing is actually true, you know, even if it’s also a cliché! Had it happen to me: made casual, accidental hand contact with someone I had a serious crush on and a mild electric shock is a very good description of what it felt like. Wasn’t unexpected though, and also wasn’t mutual. No romance for the ages, a crush is exactly what it remained.

  5. Maeve says:

    FYI: I get Alison Stuart’s newsletter and she’s self-publishing Terror in Topaz (book 4) — the cover art is finalized!

  6. Kareni says:

    Thank you, Sarah and Amanda, for a fun session.

    Sarah, I believe the “older book, two dudes and a, and a woman” is by Lauren Dane.

  7. Amelia says:

    Re: obvious choice love triangle— once every year or so I will remember and be baffled that Melanie Ting’s HOCKEY IS MY BOYFRIEND trilogy never got the flowers it deserved. It follows the same heroine from HS to her 20s. The first book is YA romance with her fuckboy BFF.
    The second book is NA (with butt stuff, if I recall) with a virgin NHL draft pick hero.
    And the 3rd book resolves the love triangle in a CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE!!!! I remember reading both endings and being equally delighted with each. Literally no obvious choice. I have no idea how she pulled it off and refuse to investigate because it came out almost a decade ago and I’m scared.

    My toxic trait as a romance reader is that I often think the most satisfying HEA would involve the heroine dumping the hero and riding off into the sunset and this trilogy delivers BOTH the righteous dumpings AND the romance HEA- best of all worlds.

  8. Vasha says:

    @Anelia: Wow. I don’t think I’m going to read that but I’m delighted that it exists.

    My favorite love triangle book is In the Cards by Cecilia Lake. The setup is hokey as can be: the heroine gets a card reading and is told she’ll have to choose between lovers, and advised against the one with money. Sure enough, she’s invited to a house party in hopes she’ll marry the wealthy hostess’s son, and she considers the idea, but it becomes clear over the first half of the story that she has more rapport with the son’s best friend. I’m amazed that Lake pulled it off thanks to delicate character writing. Very unusually, each of the men has POV chapters, not for purposes of maintaining uncertainty, but because there’s as much focus on their friendship as on the developing romance–they’re under strain but not because of love rivalry. Yeah, there’s no rivalry, no jealousy! And lest anyone say “let this develop into an MMF story,” one of the guys mentions early on that they’re so close people sometimes assume they’re lovers, but they’re not. How’d Lake pull off making that sound like a natural thing to say? It’s lovely watching this story subvert every conventional expectation and develop into a tight three-way friendship as well as two-way romance.

  9. ReadKnitSnark says:

    I guess I’ll reread INTO THE CARDS next. The good thing is that Celia Lake self publishes, so no strike issues.

    And the Lauren Dane mentioned upthread and in the podcast by SB Sarah is TART. (Published by Penguin)(I was just thinking about it again this week because cramps.)

    I’ve noticed that I am no longer aware of publishers. I used to be hyper aware, back in the old days when I needed to keep notes about my favorite authors and the titles of their books and the publishers of said titles because the more information I had, the easier it was for me to order at the brick and mortar bookstore. These days, everything is found in a few clicks; you rarely even have to type in anything much… (I no longer have to wade to school through snow drifts in a snowstorm uphill both ways, either.)(Though last winter/spring’s bicycling to work through snow was epic in a bad way.)

    Entertaining podcast episode, ladies.

  10. ReadKnitSnark says:

    Also, it is killing me that the “older book” that feels plenty recent to me was published ten years ago. I guess I should incorporate some stretches into my routine to keep my bones from creaking audibly… Nothing to be done about the memory issues, though. Eat more chocolate and carry on!

  11. Sarah F says:

    When Amanda said “you know that hard piece of lotion” I started laughing so hard that my spouse came to check on me.

  12. @SB Sarah says:

    It makes me absolutely giddy that you all enjoyed the episode so much!

    @sarah F: me too. Amanda is so freaking funny.

  13. @SB Sarah says:

    @Maeve: I am SO excited to hear that!

  14. Rhonda says:

    I think you’ve talked about it before, but I read a lot of MM romances – does a certain part of male anatomy really “twitch”? [I’m not sure of the ratings on comments.] I have to laugh everytime I read this.

  15. Gemma says:

    Here’s a minor one that irks me:

    In historical romance, characters doing embroidery are always “biting off the thread” to end it. Somehow they manage to do this without distorting the fabric or stitching. Are their teeth super sharp? Why are they always using their teeth, did no one own a pair of scissors? Even a penknife?

  16. @SB Sarah says:

    @Gemma: OH my GOSH YES. You’re so right and I never thought about it until right now. Now I’m imagining all historical embroidering characters with monstrous sharp teeth.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top