B+
Genre: Contemporary Romance, LGBTQIA, Romance
Theme: Friends to Lovers, Marriage of Convenience
Archetype: Diverse Protagonists
This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by Vasha. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Short Contemporary Romance category.
The summary:
My name is Rachel. I’m straight . . . I think. I also have a mountain of student loans and a smart mouth. I wasn’t serious when I told Pari Sadashiv I’d marry her. It was only party banter! Except Pari needs a green card, and she’s willing to give me a breather from drowning in debt.
My off-the-cuff idea might not be so terrible. We get along as friends. She’s really romantically cautious, which I find heartbreaking. She deserves someone to laugh with. She’s kind. And calm. And gorgeous. A couple of years with her actually sounds pretty good. If some of Pari’s kindness and calm rubs off on me, that’d be a bonus, because I’m a mess—anorexia is not a pretty word—and my little ways of keeping control of myself, of the world, aren’t working anymore.
And if I slip up, Pari will see my cracks. Then I’ll crack. Which means I gotta get out, quick, before I fall in love with my wife.
Here is Vasha's review:
Rachel Fizel is as surprised as anyone when, hearing Pari Sadashiv talk about the difficulty of staying in the US short of marrying someone, she blurts out “I’d marry you.” What prompts such a proposal to someone she barely knows? Just doing a favor (with financial benefits to herself), or an instinct that’s truer than she realizes? If the two women go through with this plan, they’ll have a lot of distrust and uncertainty to overcome before they figure out what they really mean to each other.
Rachel, an MFA in film now working for a low-status studio, narrates the book in the first person. This is her first potential relationship with a woman (Pari on the other hand calls herself a “gold star lesbian”—American slang for one who’s never slept with a man). And as we soon learn, Rachel is a recovering anorexic who’s not holding herself together as well as she likes to think. Her illness colors all her thoughts, in a mess of doubts, self-hatreds, and distorted ideas. It isn’t simple to figure out, and it isn’t simple to fix; she’s not entirely well at the end of the book, either. Her habit of trying to hide herself is a great obstacle to opening up to Pari. But Pari is great about accepting this aspect of her, especially in a heartwarming scene at the end.
It took me a while to warm up to Rachel’s narration. Frankly, it isn’t always pleasant to be in the head of someone who’s so consistently down on herself. And although Rachel is excellent at conveying how gorgeous, elegantly poised, kind, and breathtakingly sexy Pari is (not that she’s perfect—she’s sometimes immersed in work when at home, and her poise can harden into coolness), it’s harder to understand what Pari would see in Rachel. That’s precisely because we’re seeing Rachel through her own eyes; if she doesn’t find anything lovable about herself, how should we? Eventually, though, her genuine love of filmmaking shines through her self-deprecation, and we see her being competent at work and empathetic with other people; we learn along with Pari to treasure her rare moments of unselfconscious happiness. And there are the times that being with Pari lights her up, the times they laugh together or dance in perfect synchrony.
There’s nothing tepid about this romance; the UST is thick in the air, and the emotional connection (when it happens) is deep. Here’s a quote from early on in the book, illustrating the maybe-it’s-not-real-but-I-wish-it-was uncertainty, as the two of them tell Pari’s parents over Skype that they’re in love (yes, they decided to lie to her parents—I found the mixed motives that led Pari to do so understandable, if disappointing):
Pari laces our hands together. It’s only when she lifts them above the level of the camera, to display in the picture, that I realize it’s just for show. I swallow. She brings our combined hands to her mouth and kisses my knuckles. The kiss is as light as fairy wings, and as reverent as taking mass. The way she looks up at me makes my stomach swoop.
“She’s the most positive person I’ve ever met, Papa.” She looks back at the screen. “Not blindly positive though. She’s hopeful even through the darkness she carries with her. You’re going to admire her, Amma. Just give her a chance.”
Later in that scene:
Pari turns to me with her eyes going huge. “You don’t know what you’re getting into,” she whispers.
“It’ll be fine.” I bump my shoulder against hers. “I can have a white dress this way. I’ve never had a reason to wear a fancy dress.”“Not ever?”
“I skipped prom. I’ve worn nice dresses, but never a ball gown.”
We’re in our own little world again somehow. I know on one level that Pari’s parents are avidly watching us, but I’m not paying attention to them. Pari’s hand is hot in mine, and she’s rubbing my knuckles with her thumb. I don’t think she realizes, but I do. I realize with every inch of my hand. I’d pull away from the way it’s making me feel, but Sadashiv and Niharika would wonder at our cracks.
That’s what I tell myself, at least.
If we are to fairly consider this book, we do have to think about the issue of biphobia. I felt a twinge of reflexive annoyance when Pari reveals that she is hesitant to get involved with Rachel because she thinks Rachel is straight. Bisexual erasure is all over this book; when Rachel makes her initial offer of marriage, everyone listening laughs and assures Pari that of course it can’t be taken seriously, because Rachel’s not gay, wasn’t she just dating that guy who ran a club? And Pari says that her mother, of all people, advised her not to “mess around with straight girls” (in Pari’s words). Pari had an experience which is kind of a cliche in lesbian stories: her last relationship was with a woman she’d befriended who had just broken up with her husband, and who apparently used her for a combination of convenient bedwarmer, interesting novelty, and middle-finger message to her husband—and then went back to the husband. But anyhow, after that, it’s clear why Pari would be warily looking for signs that when Rachel takes her to bed, it’s likewise a case of just-because-she’s-there. And the fact that she puts this fear into biphobic terms is, well, so common in the real world that it’s completely believable.
Is this point of view endorsed by it being established, later on, that Rachel never really was into any of the guys she slept with? Probably, but Rachel’s experiences are described with so much individual detail that it doesn’t seem that way; everything she did and felt previously makes sense according to her own, often-messed-up thinking.
Speaking of cliches, we have the enormous-ethnic-family going on too—Pari’s mother alarms Rachel by proposing a minimum of 300 guests at the wedding, from the extended family; this contrasts with Rachel’s small and scattered WASP family, consisting only of a childless uncle and her own chilly, distant mother, living symbolically in Alaska. But when Niharika arrives, and later other members of the family make brief appearances, they are given individuality. There are mentions of Tamil Hindu wedding customs that baffle Rachel, but we don’t learn much about them because Rachel is too unsure of herself to ask for explanations. By the time the wedding actually happens, though, Rachel and Pari are sure it’s exactly what they want, and Rachel will be carried through her bewilderment by happiness.
I can’t emphasize enough how well written this book is, especially the dialogue. As a bonus, we get a good picture of the setting (southern Orange County near Laguna Beach—Rachel is a native California girl).
This book is available from:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well.
Thanks!
How did the rating go from A- to B+?
@Ginger: Whoops, fixed! The grade of the review was changed by the reviewer, but we forget to edit the text.
Our first RITA review and it’s a really well done one. Thank you Vasha.
Thanks Vasha! I read and enjoyed the 2nd in this series but this looked a little dark for me.
A lesbian romance featuring a bisexual film maker with an eating disorder? Yeah. Ironically enough, Far From Home might be a little too close to home for me. It is a shame though because Riptide usually produces such good books and this review does make it sound interesting.
Sorry to nitpick, but from the cover image it would seem that the author’s name is actually Lorelie rather than Lorelei.
Great review though, thanks Vasha!
How does the book handle the immigration angle? Getting a greencard is not easy, especially for LGBT couples (http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2016/2/26/green-cards-still-elusive-many-same-sex-couples).
A marriage needs to be valid for two years before a permanent greencard application (before that you only get a temporary one for 2 years and then have to prove again you are really married) and after that the approval process is another few months if they get through the interview questioning the relationship (likely more difficult if Pari is from the subcontinent and not the UK or EU plus the LGBT angle).
The foreign spouse is super dependent on the citizen in this, since a divorce during the wait time cancels the application process completely (no more work permit!). For a citizenship application the wait time is an I wonder how that plays into relationship dynamics.
Also, this is committing visa fraud, and a huge risk for Pari. If they divorce and UCSIS decides that the marriage was fraudulent,e.g. years later during aapplication for citizenship, it can lead to deportation (even after decades in the US).
All of these issues apply without possible changes by the current administration, which isn’t known for its immigration and LGBT friendly stance.
Mona I haveen’t read the book, but the summary includes the sentence “A couple of years with her actually sounds pretty good.” so the author is aware that a minimum of two years togther as a married couple is necessary.
@Mona: I’m not sure the author put quite that much thought into it, but there actually is a bit where Pari talks about some of the things you said. And they’re super-cautious, not telling anyone even their parents about the plan, and at the party Pari waits until not overheard to ask “were you serious about that offer of marriage”? You’re right to wonder about it– I like contemporaries not to break my suspension of disbelief, and Pari is supposed to be a lawyer, so she shouldn’t do something completely unworkable!
Excellent Review!
“Rachel Fizel is as surprised as anyone when, hearing Pari Sadashiv talk about the difficulty of staying in the US short of marrying someone, she blurts out “I’d marry you”
I could, of course, be wrong as I so often am, but I have been under the impression that it is no longer an option.
I googled. It’s not at all straight forward and in my opinion, lessens my desire to read it. http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/undocumented-illegal-immigrant-get-green-card-marriage-citizen-resident.html
Thank you for answer Vasha! I wish it was more detailed, especially if one protagonist is a lawyer. You might think that this would be the last person to try something illegal. Also, usually an employer would sponsor a work visa greencard (well, not anymore, and can take a decade especially for Indians). I wish US citizens new more about immigration process and how it is not as easy as it looks. And as Gloriamarie posted it is impossible once you are undocumented (which is not the quite same as in violation of your visa etc.)
Thanks for this great review – I’ll check this out. As a bi-sexual woman it is kind of annoying that there are so few books that have bi characters. It’s either het, M/M or F/F. I guess there must be some out there, but the only mainstream books I can think of are J R Ward’s Black Dagger Brotherhood with Quinn/Blay/Lyla and sort of V and Butch (but that got derailed pretty quickly).
@quizzie: One good one I know of is The Girl Next Door by Amy Jo Cousins– a M/F romance where the heroine is bisexual and there’s no question (by anyone) that her previous relationship, with a woman, was anything but real and important. On the whole, Cousins is more miss than hit for me, but I do love The Girl Next Door. If you read it, you should start with Off Campus where the H/h are introduced as side characters.