Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

391. RWA One Month Later, Part IV: A Conversation with Courtney Milan

Welcome to part four and the final episode in my series on RWA: One Month Later. We’ve heard from C Chilove, Laurel Cremant, and Diana Neal, the officers of CIMRWA, from past RWA president HelenKay Dimon, and from Jessie Edwards, Marketing and PR Manager for RWA.

Today, I’m speaking with Courtney Milan.

There’s a lot to process, and this is a somewhat emotional interview wherein we talk about what happened, her reactions, and what’s next for her. We also talk intermittently though non-specifically about the physical manifestations of trauma so please be aware going into this episode if that’s something difficult for you to listen to.

I’ll be taking this Friday, February 7, off, and I’ll be back on February 14 – Valentine’s Day – with Amanda. See you then!

Music: https://www.purple-planet.com

You can subscribe to Smart Podcast, Trashy Books at Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or wherever you catch your favorite shows!

Read the transcript

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at [email protected] or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Click to view the transcript

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

Uncategorized

Add Your Comment →

  1. library addict says:

    Great interview.

    Regardless of what happens going forward, I hope everyone who plans to stay with RWA listens to this and truly hears what Courtney is saying, especially her analogy at the end.

  2. Elaine says:

    Great interview and great series. (Though I must admit I couldn’t handle the PR speak of #3 and DNF.) I haven’t really been following this since the December blow up so it was good to read the retrospective. I am another OWL (Older White Lady) who is trying to get a handle on my privilege and bias and this situation makes me queasy.

  3. Olivia Waite says:

    Just wanted to say: thank you, Sarah, for this podcast series. Romance is great at bringing receipts in a fight, but less good at keeping documentation of all the industry shifts and fiascos. It’s some comfort in the chaos to have an extended discussion of what happened, how it felt, what it was like to live through. This is an incredible series, and it does feel like a gift.

    Thank you as well to GarlicKnitter for the transcripts!

  4. margaret says:

    Thank you, Sarah. I listened to every word of these four podcasts, and I am left with a sense of overwhelming sadness. I am sad for all the hours of effort that members of CIMRWA put in, that HelenKay Dimon put in, and I am especially both grateful for and horrified by all the hours of her life that Courtney Milan dedicated to an organization that in turn showed her nothing but derision. It is beyond understanding that the remaining “leaders” of RWA cannot comprehend the necessity of a simple dictum: “RWA does not welcome members who do not share the belief that love is love is love, regardless of color, creed, gender or orientation.” Would that really be asking too much?

    Thank you, Sarah, for all the time and psychic energy you’ve devoted to publicizing this fiasco and by doing so, attempting to affect positive change.

  5. Stephanie Scott says:

    Thank you for asking Courtney if she is OK. I think that matters. I can’t fathom what it feels like to have this happen and all those articles coming out. I’ve been fortunate to be in the loop with other current and former chapter leaders in initiatives this past month and am blown away all over again listening to these podcasts by how poorly every moment of this was handled by RWA. I’ve talked about this A LOT and I’m currently speechless.

  6. Ava Jarvis says:

    Oh boy do I have a lot of thoughts.

    I am Vietnamese, and I used to identify as a woman but these days I’m non-binary.

    Back in those days of woman-identifying, I used to write about science fiction and fantasy. I even got paid a little bit for it. One day I wrote a paid post on a fairly major website where I expressed disappointment that such and such an author had behaved in a racist way, but that I wouldn’t mention his name or go into details, because I wanted to focus on positive discussion of alternative books that treated marginalized people better, which I then did. I posted a link to someone else’s posts with the details in case they needed the info, but otherwise I did not discuss the link either.

    So the author tried to sue me anyways for defamation.

    I … cannot actually describe the amount of trauma that occurred, and I’m someone who has experienced years of physical torture from a young age, and already have a lot of, ah, trauma expertise, as it were.

    So some things I will unpack here.

    1. To Milan’s point about tone-policing, I will say that another reason tone-policing is useless and terrible is because there is actually NO tone polite enough to not be tone-policed into the ground. With lawsuits. White supremacy is just like that. See above recollection.

    2. I will also note that because I was very quiet and “polite” when discussing racism, I was a safe target for lawsuits because some people were convinced I would not fight back, unlike the much “less polite” people. Seriously this happened in my case.

    3. Having an organization like RWA be a loose cannon of white supremacy is dangerous for everyone, whether you are part of RWA or not. Suppose that author had access to the present RWA, and was able to convince them to give him funds for that lawsuit. Don’t say that’s ridiculous, given everything that has been happening for the last month. Do you think that running a spurious lawsuit that opened the plaintiff up to countersuits would end well for *anybody*, including the author, the organization, and any innocent members who happened to be part of it?

    One more thing, a conclusion I’ve drawn after 20 years of deep thought, or half of my life: the only way to recover from white supremacy is for EVERYONE, white people INCLUDED, to UTTERLY REJECT IT.

    And I don’t mean being nice: I mean kick that shit into the sun. Quietly acquiescing to white supremacy by giving it money in the hopes that it will get better? That’s not rejecting white supremacy.

    Rejection involves: kicking out bigots. And when I say bigots, I mean people who absolutely refuse to be educated and who cross the line again and again and again.

    If you cannot do that, it’s like leaving your car parked with the windows bashed in and hoping that nobody will steal from it.

    It’s hard, it’s harsh, it’s mean, and above all, it’s not polite.

    It is, in fact, me being very much of a bitch when I say this and mean it. If I did not care, I would just say nothing and laugh while everything burns, but damn it, I care anyways, fuck my life.

    And yes, this entire situation with RWA has also triggered me. I really can’t believe I am actually saying anything instead of just running away, because I know the general uselessness of saying things. I’ve had that experience.

    Anyways people who don’t like this bitch don’t need to worry, I’m not actually going to come back with a vengeance or anything. I’m too busy healing from decades of trauma, and talking about this stuff doesn’t help anymore.

    Thank you also for the book rec re: The Body Keeps the Score. I ordered it. Paper, because my Kindle bit the dust and I need to eat this month.

  7. Another great interview. Ms. Milan’s final remarks about tone-policing really hit home; I’ll be using that analogy in the future for sure.

    Thank you for this series!

  8. Msb says:

    Excellent interview, enlightening but sensitively conducted. Great job, Sarah. And great job, Courtney, both in her service to the community and working to maintain her health and well-being.

    Like others, I find the analogy about tone policing very useful. It has, of course, been used on women since Seneca Falls (1848): “If only you had asked nicely, I might have given you what you want.” Both a lie and a deflection. A common term for feminists was “the shrieking sisterhood”. Not to mention “vulgar”, “shrill” and our old buddy “strident”.

    I disagree, however, that the racists in RWA are comfortable. They may be clinging to their denials and resisting DEI efforts, but the very force of their attack on Courtney, the desperation to shut her up at any cost, shows their terror, and ignorance. Really, what did they think would happen when they dropped their ridiculously excessive penalty on 23/12? That everybody would swallow it and sing Christmas carols?

    As several people have said, including the great N.K. Jemisin, organizations can’t succeed if they attempt to include not only marginalized voices but also those who wish to silence them. One group or the other has to go. I say, the latter. And if the latter prevail, the former should leave them in RWA’s wreckage and form a new organization.

    Once again, I need to thanks all the good guys in this saga for making me see some more of my privilege and introducing me to some wonderful new work.

    Have a great time in Korea, Courtney, but hurry back and finish the next Cyclone story so I can read it!

  9. Susan says:

    Thanks for this series. I’m going to wait to read the transcript (thank you, Garlic Knitter), but was interested to see The Body Keeps the Score referenced since I just picked up the audiobook on sale in January. So many books to squeeze into too few hours!

  10. FashionablyEvil says:

    Oh man, listening to this back to back with the Jessie Edwards interview made it clear just how mealy-mouthed and empty Edwards’ and RWA’s responses are. They just have NO CLUE what they’re doing. It’s embarrassing.

  11. Laurel says:

    Thank you for this 4-part series. I would love it if you would do a wrap-up podcast where you synthesize your thoughts about the interviews and what you think now.

  12. Christine L says:

    I just finished this series and Thank You Sarah! I needed the recap and insight.

    I was left wishing CIMRWA was its own organization because I’d join in a heartbeat. Last year I set my goals for ’20, one of them being “join RWA” since things seemed to be on the right path. My money is safely in my pocket now until I see where this all shakes out.

    I’ve been struggling as a white romance author to understand how to write an inclusive book and not be insensitive. I know sensitivity readers are there to help but I have no budget for anything essential (like editing) so I need a community where I won’t feel like a racist for asking questions. This sounds like I’m pushing back on POC writers. I’m not. I’m trying to take responsibility for me and my writing.

    God, this is such a shitty subject. I’m sure I’m not saying any of this right…

    I’m unpublished and was just about to give up completely (not all because of the RWA dumpster fire, but big NO to joining a racist organization) till I heard Courtney’s answer at the very end. I want to be a better person and writer. I want to write books that look like my neighborhood here in central NJ. Where can I go? Nowhere right? My writer friends are mostly white men (yikes!) who ask “what’s going on in your genre” but only in a condescending way.

    This is way longer than I wanted. I needed to barf out my frustrations with not having a place for honest discussion too, I guess. Again, thank you for filling in some of the blanks and providing a place for comment.

    Elaine at 3 said it better.

  13. Lisa F says:

    https://twitter.com/JenReadsRomance/status/1225429612991254528

    RWA NYC’s board stepped down this morning.

  14. willaful says:

    My husband and I have an expression, “E.R.fine,” referring to the old show, in which someone could be having a complete mental or physical breakdown but would still asset, “I’m fine!” Having to be E.R. fine for societal acceptance is a trauma in itself, I think.

  15. CK says:

    I really want the depths of RWA’s incompetence and tone-deafness to be just that but it has been bothering me: why go after someone as well equipped to defend herself as Courtney in such a sloppy way? Was all this, and this sorry-you-feel-that-way follow up lip service, just a really cynical way of consolidating the (racist) membership? I really want this to the pattern seeking part of my brain on overdrive but honestly, I can’t dismiss it. It sucks that (regardless if this result was intentional or not) the end result is diverse creators & people who support diversity get scattered and the people who are overtly racist and those who are fine with it (well intentioned or not) can continue to benefit from RWA’s powers, however diminished. In that sense I guess the only option is to vote with dollars, ie dues. I’m just a reader so I’ll have to do it with my purchasing habits I guess. If the conversation cannot take place at the institutional level right now then Courtney is right, the conversation has to take start at the personal level by directly rejecting tone policing as a tool of racism.

  16. Gail says:

    As an OWL reader I would argue that Courtney did a GREAT job. The explosion she’s fomented has made me super aware of issues I never recognized before. I’m sure I’m not the only one, thank you.

  17. chacha1 says:

    Last year, I really thought joining RWA was one way to signal my professionalism as a writer. Sigh.

    I’m self-publishing because I want to publish, and I don’t want to bang my head against any more walls in life. Like Christine L at #12, I wish I had people to look at my work and tell me I’m doing it ‘right.’ I am a middle-aged white woman writing (not exclusively, but as a big part of my series) about POC. But I can’t afford a professional editor, or an analyst, even if I knew how to find one given that I write M/M, M/F, and F/F with diverse characters. How many readers would I need, to make sure my trans character is ‘correct’? My mixed-ethnicity gay hero who grew up in foster care? My straight Latino hero who lost a brother to a drive-by? I can’t get each character authenticated. So I try my best to be accurate based on other people’s experience (i.e., research). To learn from those whose work I admire, and to be respectful.

    All I can do is continue to look around me here in L.A. and be inspired by real people in all their beautiful real diversity, and try to bring that to my invented people.

  18. Ava Jarvis says:

    Hey, not sure if folks are still reading. I want to note a couple of things about writing outside of your experience.

    1) This issue affects everybody actually, not just white folks. Sometimes I look at my fellow Asian folks doing gross appropriation of Black culture and Native customs and I really want to facepalm myself into oblivion.

    2) The nuance here is that marginalized cultures are inundated by the mainstream culture, so we will learn that stuff by just exposure and having to survive a brutal kyriarchy. Whereas for instance white folks are rarely exposed to stories about non-white people from a multitude of their own perspectives (we are not monoliths).

    3) I recommend looking for Nisi Shawl’s “Writing the Other”, it’s a very good book and course that covers a lot of ground on this matter. It was a staple recommendation in SFF in the aftermath of Racefail ’09. It helped me understand more of the complexities of this stuff.

    4) It also helps to learn about intersectionality from the source, the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw. Please do not Wikipedia this as there is an edit war right now accusing her works of being too biased to be a reference for the term and theory around it that she created. Because Wikipedia, where the page about chocolate has been under edit lock because we can’t have even small good things. Also Wikipedia is really not reliable for anything that is not white cis straight male related, please do not use it for research.

    Also I’ve seen some folks refer to intersectionality as very simple. Which is a red flag that they don’t know what intersectionality actually means or how things are in the real world. For instance: damage can be done from one community to another, but also can be done by a community to itself, and how that all interacts with the hierarchy of kyriarchy is more complex than “all hurt is equal.” Multiple marginalizations also come into this.

    5) If you do screw up, when it comes to light do not double down on your position. RWA is like a master class in what not to do when confronted about racism, so that is like the one good thing about this. Sort of good thing anyways. Well. Least worst thing.

    It’s important to remember that marginalized people are not your enemy and are not a monolith. We are not the Borg. I have seen otherwise progressive people tell me they think Asians and Black people are just mean jerks who have no compassion for other people and only want to torture progressive white people, and then use a slur that was used by the US army in Vietnam to dehumanize the Vietnamese while killing them. While knowing I was Vietnamese. Because they thought using a slur that did not apply to their target was OK.

    (It is not OK.)

    I’m pretty sure that’s what RWA bomems are saying to each other atm. That the marginalized folks are their enemies and must be crushed because we will crush them otherwise due to being a monolith with no compassion for humans. As for why attack Courtney who would kick their asses, remember that some white folks just have no sense of self-preservation. See horror movies. So there is a pattern. It’s just not a smart pattern.

    6) One last thing, do not burst into a forum for a community and ask your questions there. It’s …. I mean. I don’t quite know how a PTSD forum did not completely tear apart a romance writer who decided to come in and ask if any of us were capable of love after trauma. That person deserved it, and fortunately left soon after, but unfortunately had triggered several forum members as a result. So uh. Be really considerate? And if you screw up please stay long enough to apologize and then go. Like. You owe the folks you hurt some closure.

  19. Margaret says:

    some of us are really old, but still struggling to understand. bomens?

  20. @SB Sarah says:

    “Bomems” is short for “BOard MEMbers.” Took me a second, too!

  21. Barb says:

    There is a great podcast called “Feminist Survival Project 2020”that just did a great episode about being a “ white lady who tries” . Check it out and thanks to Sara for her Jewish characters in romance and introducing me to the book “ Burnout”

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top