Smart Podcast, Trashy Books Podcast

619. RT Rewind: September 2002 Reviews

Smart Podcast Trashy Books Romantic Times Rewind We asked our Patreon community to vote on this month’s issue, and September 2002 won by a wide margin. So let’s dive into the book reviews, shall we?

There are strange subcategories and overlapping genres, and also color-conscious aliens and amnesia, too. Plus, we talk a bit about one of the best lines Avon ever produced.

Don’t miss the visual aids, because some of the covers are something.

Read the transcript

↓ Press Play

This podcast player may not work on Chrome and a different browser is suggested. More ways to listen →

Here are the books we discuss in this podcast:

We also mentioned:

If you like the podcast, you can subscribe to our feed, or find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows!

More ways to sponsor:

Sponsor us through Patreon! (What is Patreon?)

What did you think of today's episode? Got ideas? Suggestions? You can talk to us on the blog entries for the podcast or talk to us on Facebook if that's where you hang out online. You can email us at [email protected] or you can call and leave us a message at our Google voice number: 201-371-3272. Please don't forget to give us a name and where you're calling from so we can work your message into an upcoming podcast.

Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Click to view the transcript

This podcast transcript was handcrafted with meticulous skill by Garlic Knitter. Many thanks.

Remember to subscribe to our podcast feed, find us on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Smart Podcast, Trashy Books is part of the Frolic Podcast Network. Find many more outstanding podcasts at Frolic.media/podcasts!
Categorized:

Romantic Times Rewind

Add Your Comment →

  1. Michael I says:

    The visual aids link currently goes to the May 1994 visual aids.

  2. Charlie says:

    I was the target demographic for the Avon True Romances and I loved reading them! Of course, I was also reading Stephanie Laurens at the same time, which lead to disappointment in the spice level of the Avon books… so much nostalgia, thanks for mentioning them!

  3. Kareni says:

    That was a meaty episode, Sarah and Amanda, so thank you. (And it seems strangely appropriate that a meaty episode would end with carrion!)

  4. NT says:

    I was a loyal Harlequin reader back in these days, and I remember they had a reviewer switch for the Intrigue line in mid 2002, and the ratings immediately plummeted. She really didn’t seem to like the line at all and gave a lot of 1 and 2 star reviews. If I remember correctly, the highest rated Intrigue this month received 3 stars (The Night in Question), another received 2 (Prince Under Cover), then these two one stars? I used to have a spreadsheet where I tracked the rating I gave them and what the RT reviewer did, which is probably sad.

    I don’t know if it was Shannon Short, or if she was the reviewer before this one. I would guess it was her, because she did tend to give a lot of one star reviews. She was also the Harlequin Presents and Blaze reviewer in the early 2000s and seemed to think those lines were mostly terrible too. While RT had a reputation for being overly generous with their reviews, I always wondered why they had someone reviewing several series lines who disliked them so much.

  5. Neffie says:

    Re: Catherine and the Pirate: I am generally not about age gaps but I can forgive it in certain time periods. One of my favourite classic lit romances is Marianne and Col. Brandon in Sense and Sensibility. My most recent romance read was a Georgette Heyer where the protags are about thirteen years apart. I think I could forgive it in a historical pirate fantasy if it’s not used for weird power dynamics kink.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top