C-
Genre: LGBTQIA, Paranormal, Romance
Theme: Cozy
Archetype: Chef/Foodie/Bartender, Diverse Protagonists, Witch/Wizard
This guest review comes from Lisa! A longtime romance aficionado and frequent commenter to SBTB, Lisa is a queer Latine critic with a sharp tongue and lots of opinions. She frequently reviews at All About Romance and Women Write About Comics, where she’s on staff, and you can catch her at @thatbouviergirl on Twitter. There, she shares good reviews, bracing industry opinions and thoughtful commentary when she’s not on her grind looking for the next good freelance job.
…
Some romance novels just feel like a warm hug, and Best Hex Ever definitely fits that bill – for the first half of the book. But then the love gets a little too instalusty, and the plot too weak. For all that, it initially feels like a tiny slice of fall, wrapped up in multicolored leaves and cups of apple cider. But I couldn’t go higher than a C- on it due to a few issues I had with the narrative.
Dina Whitlock is a kitchen witch who runs a small London restaurant called the Serendipity Cafe, a place where good things happen by fiat of magic tucked into the baked goods. Dina’s spells work on a combination of her own emotions and physical ingredients like cinnamon, and they are generally very good at spreading positive vibes.
While her baked goods are legendary, her magical powers are mainly a secret except to those who are closest to her. While they make everything around her delicious, Dina has been suffering from a mislaid love spell since she was a young baking school student. Any time she feels romantic or sexual attraction to someone, the hex attacks her or the object of her affection, drizzling misfortune and disaster everywhere. She has understandably remained single for some time.
British Museum curator Scott Mason manages to become the center of Dina’s bad luck hex after ordering a cup of hot earl grey and a croissant from her one morning. Scott is finally starting to heal after breaking up with a woman two years ago and isn’t looking for anything in particular, happily settling into life in London, including joining an amateur rowing team.
But Scott and Dina are instantly attracted to each other. Dina is aghast – she’s just done a tarot reading on herself and knows that way lies bad mojo. But Scott’s best friend Eric is marrying Dina’s best friend Immy, and they’re both in the wedding. They try to keep it friendly when they hie off to the hinterlands of England for the wedding weekend, even as the sexual tension between them threatens to subsume everything. Dina operates under a single burden – if Scott is the one, that means he’s going to die.
But might the cards be wrong? Is there a way away from the curse threatening to spoil Dina’s new romance? And can Dina’s mother and coven help?
There’s a good answer to those questions that I won’t spoil for you. Best Hex Ever has two charming protagonists, a lot of representation (the heroine is half-Moroccan and bisexual; the hero, as he frequently puts it, has two moms). When there is conflict, it’s the most reasonable ever laid out in a romance novel. Dina is sweet and nice and generous — well, at first. They are fairly cute together. If it weren’t so rushed, the romance would be no problem at all.
And yet I had two issues with the novel:
The way Dina’s bisexuality is portrayed didn’t quite sit right with me, and this is me speaking as a bisexual woman. The first woman that Dina ever loves is a pastry school classmate, Rory, who is freaked out by Dina’s use of magic. The relationship is the messiest in the book. Rory breaks up with her and Dina’s response is to cast a fate spell on her. The spell forces Rory to beg Dina to come back, but also results in her being in an accident. When Rory figures out what went wrong, she seems to reverse the curse onto Dina by mistake while firmly dumping her.
On top of all of this, Dina refuses to explain the backfired fate spell to her mother or her coven, because that would result in her admitting her bisexuality to her traditional-leaning mom, who’s still hoping she’ll produce grandchildren and thought Rory was a boy due to her gender-neutral name. So Dina suffers for decades due to her internalized homophobia. Her suffering was so prevalent in this part of the story that it felt overemphasized and forced, as if queer folks must go through a period of closeted self-hatred. It felt to me like more than a mere plot contrivance.
The big twist in the plot involves Dina coming out and accepting herself to break the (self-made) curse. The book treats this as a big twist but I saw it coming. This should be a good, affirmative plot arc.
But it feels extra hinky that the inciting relationship – the only same-sex one in the whole book – is portrayed as ugly, messy and controlling. It made me like Dina less, and it put a damper on my enjoyment of her relationship with Scott, which is portrayed in the book (of course) as the acme of sexual and romantic joy for her.
A number of other stereotypical plot details visit the plotline – there’s a U-Haul Lesbian joke, for instance. But at least we don’t get a babies-ever-after ending, and Scott and Dina stay childfree.
So much of this book started out wonderfully. And yet, thanks to my own lived experience, the entire effect ended up simply making me cringe.
The other problem I had is that the romance is very instalusty and moves way too fast. Like way too fast – a grand total of three weeks passes by from that first cup of earl grey to the inciting incident that causes conflict for them both.
Dina even finds out that Scott’s been injured because she’s become his emergency contact. After three weeks. Woah, kids, slow your horses!
With these caveats aside, the fallish charm of Best Hex Ever bewitched me just enough to give it a C-. There’s enough promise here to save it from a lower grade, but I hope the next book avoids some of these pitfalls.
This book is available from:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well.
Thanks!



Thanks for the review! I’m bi and I’m always looking for bi-romance, but the first spoiler seems like a deal breaker for me too.
Yeah, for anyone who is wiccan, pagan or just witchy inclined the whole premise of the book undermines the lead character – the first rule of magic is “DO NO HARM” (magick, spellcasting or any name you put on it). And for her to have any kind of intention based on force, coercion or anything of that sort means she is betraying the very energy she is trying to use. Also, in doing that the magic user is forgetting another very important tenet, the “three-fold rule”, where any magic you conjure will come back to you times three. So if it is negative intention, in any way, you don’t need another magic user to punish you…it will happen anyway. (At lease for those who believe and embody their beliefs)
And here I immediately thought the issue would be something to do with the British Museum, lol. Don’t get me wrong; I LOVE museums, but pretty sure that one is high on the list of Problematic AF Institutions.
Your concerns definitely sound 100% valid, too—that kind of rep just feels icky.
Speaking of not-great rep, seconding @Darien‘s point. Dina’s actions (and, by extension, the whole basis for the plot?) violate at least one of the most widely held and important tenets of witchcraft 🙁
@ Liz – Oh, I have a hilarious spoiler RE the British Museum and what they get up to in it. I facepalmed but not hard enough to put it into the review!
@ Darien – they play off a LOT of that as Dena being naïve and foolish and immature but she’s college-aged when this happens, for heaven’s sake!
@cleo – believe me, I can relate! I’m bi as the day is long and the latest phalanx of releases have made me picky.
@Lisa F lolll this review makes some excellent points! https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/6981499371
Also, LOVE having options and being picky. Speaking as someone whose Roman Empire is media rep, quality matters at LEAST as much as quantity. Like, as a disabled person, I’d rather a book have all abled characters than yet another villain with a mobility aid
@Liz –
OK, I actually think the crotch of the tights getting bibbidi-bobbidi-bonked back together is an Actual Plot Point that gets a mention in the chapter after but YEP this is what I meant!