Book Review

My Fake Rake by Eva Leigh

This book is kind of a weird read. I don’t mean that in a bad way. I think I mean it in a good way? It’s mostly charmingly bizarre. This book puts a lot of plates spinning in the air, and while some of them end up crashing to the ground and breaking, the show is fun while it lasts.

The basic premise is that Grace and Sebastian are two scholarly nerds who are friends. Grace wants to attract the marital interest of another scholar, Mason Fredericks, who only thinks of Grace as a Professional Colleague and not a Hot Young Woman. (I, personally, have only ever encountered the opposite problem, wherein men in academia view me only as a Hot Person for Flirting With and not as a Real Scholar. #workplacesexism, amiright?) One day, when Sebastian takes off his glasses, Grace realizes that he is a GRADE-A HOTTIE and enlists him to help make Mason jealous by fake-courting her. Naturally, this involves giving Sebastian a makeover, to turn him into a “fake rake.” Shenanigans ensue.

If you are bothered by the deployment of such ludicrous movie tropes as “person becomes incredibly hot without glasses” and makeover montages, you will HATE this book. If you find the idea of ludicrous movie tropes being deployed inside a historical romance novel completely delightful, this book is for you!

The prologue is quite literally The Breakfast Club, but set at Eton. Five teenage schoolboys from very different walks of life have to write essays on who they “believe themselves to be” in Saturday detention. This prologue introduces our hero, Sebastian, and the other eventual heroes of this series. Within The Breakfast Club: Regency Boys’ Boarding School Edition, Sebastian is definitively the nerd.

There is some inherent ridiculousness to re-situating 1980s movie tropes (and not just tropes–entire scenes!) in Regency London. But the book leans in to the ridiculous in a way that I enjoyed, and that mostly works. For example, the fairy godmother-figure for Sebastian’s makeover into a High Society Hunk is Sebastian’s Eton friend, the Duke of Rotherby. This creates a genuinely hilarious dynamic where the Duke is perpetually annoyed at Sebastian and Grace’s lack of common sense as they attempt to make Sebastian into the kind of “Corinthian” who could make Mason Fredericks jealous.

For example, after an early makeover mishap, Sebastian says:

“All we need to do is a bit more research.”

Grace nodded in agreement. “Research solves everything.”

The duke pinched the bridge of his nose as he squeezed his eyes shut. “Good. God.”

Sebastian and Grace also often frame their observations about society in the terms of their respective academic disciplines, which is another source of humor. Grace makes up scientific names for the people who surround her, like Dandium vulgaris, the “Common Dandy.” Later, she says of her observation of younger Society men:

“Showing off their thighs in an evident courtship display. Very common within the animal kingdom.”

“Are you sketching?Seb asked. “Male thighs?

Overall, this is an uncommonly funny historical romance. However, I do have to say that some of the makeover plot points, while humorous, seem contrived. For example, Grace first tries to teach Sebastian how to be a rake from her father’s forty-year-old etiquette handbooks, which ends in Sebastian trying to use extremely out of date manners and creeping out everyone in the park. But even though Grace does not like Society, she has been to Society events and beheld human men doing polite human man things with her own eyes. So she should have known instantly that the old books were wrong even if she didn’t know how to correctly teach Sebastian. Nonetheless, the shenanigans that she and Sebastian, and Sebastian’s friend the Duke of Rotherby get up to are fun and funny.

Other than the wacky humor, another incredibly charming thing about this book is that it reads as a believable portrait of two legitimately awkward and anxious people falling in love. Lots of books CLAIM to be about awkward people falling in love but then fail to demonstrate anything more than very minor, run-of-the mill awkwardness during the course of the romance. However, both parties to this love story are kind and gentle people who are truly, spectacularly awkward. One example: while waxing poetic about the inaccurate anatomy of the topless women in a ballroom mural, Grace compares her own breasts to petit fours. To which Sebastian responds, “They’re, erm, quite nice.”

Wow, grade-A seduction, you weirdos.

I promise, however, that there are many good hot and steamy moments that are not, um, whatever this is.

Sebastian and Grace’s mutual awkwardness and general social discomfort is presented in a way that is very sweet and that is also a real, believable source of misunderstanding. Sebastian becomes very nervous and clams up around strangers. Grace feels uncomfortable in social situations because she has previously been judged and shunned at society events for being a Female Intellectual (GASP). Neither of them ever want to say how they feel for fear of even mildly inconveniencing the other person. And naturally both Grace and Sebastian assume the other feels nothing for them and that to express their own feelings would just cause GUILT and RUINATION OF THE FRIENDSHIP:

She wouldn’t throw away four years of friendship on a few uninvited sensual thoughts. Oh, maybe when she’d first met Sebastian, she’d hoped their camaraderie might evolve into something more intimate. But he’d always been scrupulously polite and treated her strictly as a colleague and confidant.

The entire reason they have not become romantically involved in four years of friendship, in spite of a mutual attraction, is that they both assume that the other person is not interested and that to express interest would be somehow presumptuous and/or rude. And once they embark on their plan to snare Mason for Grace, Sebastian assumes that Grace is only interested in Mason, and Grace assumes that Sebastian’s cooperation with her plan to snare another man is confirmation of his disinterest in her. It’s quite a tangle.

Even as they get closer to each other in a way that is decidedly romantic (waggles eyebrows), they keep trying to explain away the other person’s (and sometimes their own) feelings as a trick of the moment, or the mood, or the lighting, or the weather. This is a romance where the obstacles could be removed by people just talking to each other, but the fact that they feel that can’t just talk to each other makes sense for these two people. And it makes it that much more satisfying when they are able to communicate clearly about their feelings.

So, this book is quite funny, and the romance is emotionally strong. However, it could stand to be tightened up a bit. There’s some repetition in the descriptions (the Duke is described as arrogant or conceited maybe 10,000 times). Grace and Sebastian admonish themselves a LOT in internal monologues for finding the other attractive, and it borders on too much. Like, thinking your friend is hot is not inherently disrespectful, my dudes. And sometimes the more intellectual-minded dialogue about Scholarly Pursuits reads as two people just saying non-sequitur opinions to each other. (This is definitely a real thing smart people do, but I don’t think it was intentional here).

However, I have to say that there was one aspect of this book that legitimately troubled me and it was Sebastian’s stated academic vocation and how it was handled. Sebastian is an (aspiring) anthropologist. Anthropologists’ scholarly work often comes in the form of ethnography, which is basically embedding yourself within a social group and describing its norms and customs. (Ethnography is the first social science method I was trained in, which makes me probably more likely than the average reader to be annoyed by the way it is framed and handled here).

Unfortunately, for most of the history of anthropology, anthropological study (and the resulting ethnographies) has been profoundly racist, imperialist, and colonialist. Basically, it’s been a lot of White men and White women in power going to colonized or otherwise subjugated nations and describing how “primitive” the people there were as a way to justify dominating them. There’s a reason why there is a very real movement within the social sciences today to discourage outsider ethnographies and move instead towards insider ethnographies, where the person reporting on the group is also a member of the group. There have also been other advancements in how ethnography is conceptualized and conducted to make the whole thing less of a racist clusterf*ck. The fact remains that during the Regency era, anthropology as a discipline was a distinctly imperialist project, and I think it is very hard to have an anthropologist hero in this era who is not in some way implicated in that.

I don’t want it to come across that I think that an interest in social justice and equity is ahistorical. It’s not; people have been interested in social justice as long as there has been a society. And the characters in this book do acknowledge that much of the science being produced in their current era (including the anthropology) is racist. This somewhat reassured me, as did the fact that for much of the book, Sebastian was studying British customs for his eventual ethnographic book. I thought this was going to be a clever nod to the whole insider ethnography movement, until the epilogue.

In the epilogue, Grace and Sebastian join an expedition to South America funded by a British woman. The nominal purpose of this expedition full of scientists and naturalists is to study South America in order to report on how the environments and natural habitats there could be preserved. However, as part of the expedition, Sebastian is going to study the people living there to “report on indigenous cultures.” YIKES.

It doesn’t matter how personally nice or not bigoted Grace and Sebastian are. They are still members of a colonizing nation, using the power afforded them as members of that colonizing nation to go to a place, get in the business of the people who live there without their consent, and generally exploit the resources of that place. Even though they each purport to be against aspects of the English imperialist project, they are ultimately using it to advance their respective scientific careers, which feels gross. This feels doubly true given the role that Western scientific discourses have played in alternately stealing and/or repressing Indigenous knowledge and culture. A hero or heroine’s commitment to social justice that ends with them basically becoming part of the English colonizing apparatus shows that commitment to be fundamentally hollow.

I struggled with how much to factor what felt like a jarring deployment of anthropology (and science as a discipline in general) into my grade, since without the epilogue, I was more of a “sure, I guess?” on the anthropology aspect instead of a “yuck.” It is clear that the main characters are at least supposed to be interested in justice and equity, even if the execution isn’t QUITE there. I think without the epilogue the grade would probably be a B- or maybe even a B, but with it, it’s a C+, because even though it was only a few pages it did change my reading experience a fair amount.

I guess what I’m getting at is that my main critique of this book is that there is a thematic disconnect. On one hand, there are a lot of overt statements in My Fake Rake about women’s rights, the perils of toxic masculinity, and why scientific racism is Bad. On the other hand, there are some things going on below the surface where the book fails to grapple with the full implications of some of the concepts that are introduced i.e. the English as colonizers and the role science played in that. It creates some vexing moments as a reader during what is otherwise a pretty feel-good book. I said earlier in my review that it felt as if the book was putting a lot of plates in the air and some of them fell to the ground. These are the plates that fell to the ground. (I guess we can call them the implication plates? Coherent theme plates?)

Maybe a historical romance love story between two socially awkward friends and it’s full of cute movie references and trope inversions and they both have fully fleshed out but overall dissimilar scholarly ambitions and there’s another guy involved and he’s also a scientist but to get his attention they have to do Society and it’s about double standards facing women and men in both the professional and private spheres and it’s about England as an imperial and scientific power…makes for too many things to try to cram into one book and have it all work and be coherent.

I think if you can handle an occasional feeling of “huh?” while reading this book without getting whiplash, and the trope-y elements of this book appeal, it’s a fun read. There is definitely a lot to like! However, if you are hoping this book presents a particularly nuanced stance on the history of science or even the practice of intellectual inquiry via its two scholarly protagonists, moderate your expectations. Also, please skip the epilogue. (Now instead of dreading epilogue babies, I will be dreading epilogue scientific fieldwork expeditions.)

This book is available from:
  • Available at Amazon
  • Order this book from apple books

  • Order this book from Barnes & Noble
  • Order this book from Kobo
  • Order this book from Google Play

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well. Thanks!

My Fake Rake by Eva Leigh

View Book Info Page

Add Your Comment →

  1. Anna says:

    As an anthropologist, I can say you’re absolutely right about the discipline’s racist, colonialist history. Anthropology as a field was essentially created to justify imperialist thought: if you can “scientifically” prove that Western Europeans are superior to all other groups of humans, then you can rationalize colonialist expansion as a necessary part of “civilizing” the world.

    Maybe it just hits too close to home for me, but I don’t think I can read a historical romance where someone is an anthropologist. Thank you for the review!

  2. JoanneBB says:

    I loved your aside at the end of the review “(Now instead of dreading epilogue babies, I will be dreading epilogue scientific fieldwork expeditions.)”

    Maybe just no epilogues, period. Wrap up the story in the story.

    I’ve read other books by this author, and I like the dialogue, generally, but this sounds like one I wait for a sale.

  3. LauraL says:

    @ JoanneBB – I was thinking the same thing and have added the book to my Wish List.

    I’ve really enjoyed the dialogues between the heroes and heroines in previous books by Eva Leigh. “Research solves everything.” sounds like something I might say. LOL

  4. HeatherS says:

    I put this one on hold because I’ve read other books by the author and enjoyed them, plus that cover is rainbow pretty shiny wow! After reading this review, I cancelled my library hold and decided my reading time can be better spent elsewhere.

  5. Liz Skedd says:

    Wouldn’t it have been cool if Sebastian had gone to South Africa to study the colonists, and compare their behaviour in the colony vs at home

  6. Meg says:

    There are times I really feel you guys are out to get this author for trying new things. See the review for her last book, which basically laid into her for dare stretching the boundaries of history to give a sex worker a happy ending with a duke.

    What was Sebastian going to do over in South America? Cook for Grace? Do her laundry? I think as established in the book, Sebastian isn’t going to exploit these people the way a lot did, and his focus is probably going to be on how to preserve the customs of the people living there since the whole bulk of the expedition is to focus on preservation and that specifically includes people. For all we know, Sebastian may look at what’s being done and decide not to write anything at all to preserve those people. It would be in character for him.

    This IS a feel-good book and I absolutely loved it. One of the things you skipped over is how diverse the colleagues that they work with are. I don’t see these two people exploiting the people of South America and really feel like you’re scraping at the bit to find something wrong in this book in the name of social justice.

  7. Karen D says:

    Nothing to do with the review or contents of the book at all, but I really have to ask what is up with that woman on the cover? It’s like she’s one of those bendy toy figures. There is no way an actual human looks that way from the torso down. Is there? Sorry, I just can’t seem to NOT focus on his hand around her “waist.”

  8. Brigid says:

    I sorta disagree about the comment about finding your friends hot. I feel that a lot of time in romance we overlook the more normalized stuff in society. One of the things that’s quite normalized is the idea that women’s bodies exist for men to sexualize, esp with the unrequited love trope. The friend zone thing gets quite icky in a lot of tv shows and movies because it expects women to exist for his pleasure. I really like that Leigh was smart enough to recognize the way that women’s bodies are often normalized as sexual things in romance. Not only that but I felt like she is undoing a lot of the old school stuff that feminist readers are critiquing. So I think it was a good thing to do. But I get it if it seemed more repetitive. That critique I will agree about.

  9. @Ellen says:

    @Brigid I take your point; I personally felt that the repetitiveness on the part of both hero and heroine (wherein every time one thinks the other is attractive they have to give some kind of self-admonition) made it seem less about a gendered issue re: the objectification of women and more like there was an underlying idea that you can’t both respect someone as a whole person and find them attractive. i don’t think it’s necessary for people to scold themselves every time they feel attracted to a person that they are friends with and genuinely respect, especially if they aren’t proceeding as though they are entitled to anything from that person. The friend zone is a toxic idea but I think the idea that it’s somehow bad or inappropriate to feel any attraction to your friends creates a troubling dichotomy between people you are friends with and share intellectual and emotional support with vs. people you are attracted to and want to pursue romantically but don’t share intellectual and emotional support with.

  10. Star says:

    I haven’t read this one yet, but I read her previous trilogy not long ago (the sex worker + duke book was SO GOOD), and I think one of her weaknesses as an author is her tendency to have the characters have the same internal monologues over and over and over and over and OVER again. It’s as though Leigh doesn’t trust her reader to remember how her characters’ minds work.

    To her credit, the nature of the monologue is usually specific to the characters, rather than the same monologue in each book, and also having the same conversation with yourself over and over is a very realistic feature of many humans (I plead guilty). But it’s sort of like going to the bathroom? As a reader, I do not need to read about it every time a character needs to use the loo; I am perfectly happy understanding that they are doing all their bathroom functions off-page in normal style. I only need to read about this if it impacts the plot in some way. Similarly, I don’t need to read about it every time a character has the same moment of self-reproach for finding their friend hot (or whatever it is for these characters). Show me this once, write the inner monologue in such a way that it’s obvious that it’s one of many, and then revisit it only when something changes.

  11. Lisa F says:

    Reviews for this one are so mixed; I’m going to give it a go and see what I think.

  12. Ambar says:

    I think I’m going to DNF this, which is sad because “geeky science heroine” is totally my catnip. For me it falls under the heading of “modern people/attitudes in costume.” I can handle a little bit of that, but combining it with the ludicrous movie tropes as the reviewer describes leaves me… meh. There’s just too much of “I could not possibly speak honestly to my BEST FRIEND” for me to be sold on the romance.

    I’ll probably go reread Courtney Milan and Cat Sebastian instead.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top