Other Media Review

Movie Review: Kong: Skull Island

Although it’s no longer a new release, I feel compelled to write a review of Kong: Skull Island if for no other reason than to inform our readers that Tom Hiddleston’s clothes stay on all the way through the movie. This is a fun popcorn movie that offers two hours of carnage, a smidgen of comedy, and a feminist heroine. It is not deep and it does not make any sense whatsoever. It delivers what it promises and no more: monster fights.

All these characters have names but my family discovered that as we walked out of the theater we could not recall any names other than “Kong.” I could look these names up, but they do not matter. I will refer to these characters by their actor names or by character descriptions and trust me, so will you.

Here’s the plot: On the last day of the Vietnam War, John Goodman convinces some random government guy to let him take a survey team and a military escort to a previously uncharted island to chart stuff. The science team includes a war photographer (Brie Larson) and a tracker (Tom Hiddleston, whose reaction to the word “uncharted” is to shoot his eyebrows all the way up to the ceiling in disapproval). Their increasingly unstable leader is played by Samuel L. Jackson.

Samuel L. Jackson, looking cranky, and his team
Not Amused

All these people go to the island and immediately piss off Kong, who expresses his feelings by destroying many helicopters in many ways – it’s thrilling and horrifying. The survivors find themselves in two groups. Group Tom meets a castaway (John C. Reilly) who explains that Kong is actually OK as long as you don’t drop bombs on his island and then shoot at him. Group Tom also consists of most of the civilians. All they want to do is get to the extraction point without being eaten by the many oversized predators on the island.

Group Samuel L. consists of most of the military dudes and John Goodman. Watching John Goodman and Samuel L. Jackson make obsessive crazy eyes at each other is quite delightful. Samuel L. becomes obsessed with killing Kong in revenge for the men he lost in the helicopter debacle. As the two groups wander around, they get picked off by a wide variety of over-sized monsters. Even the little monsters are a pain in the ass.

John C. Reilly, looking amused and wacky
On the other hand, John C. Reilly is TOTALLY amused. He finds this HILARIOUS.

Here are some things that DON’T happen:

  1. Kong does not go to New York City.
  2. Samuel L. Jackson does not say “Get these mother-fucking monsters off my mother-fucking island.” Nor does he say, “Hand me my gun – it’s the one with ‘Bad Ass Motherfucker’ on the handle.”
    He does, however, say, “Hold onto your butts,” a shout-out to Jurassic Park.
  3. No one develops a passionate romance. Kong and Brie Larson bond a little, and Black Geologist and Asian Biologist flirt, but there’s no kissing.

What DOES happen is a lot of creative carnage. The only reason to see this film is if you like giant monster movies, and if you do, you’ll be quite happy. If you don’t, you’ll be bored out of your mind. This is a movie for the person who asks, “If Kong just, I dunno, GRABBED a helicopter, and then just…oh, I’m thinking, THREW IT at another helicopter, how would that go, exactly?” It goes loudly, is how it goes. I loved it. If you are considering taking kids, keep in mind that the carnage is amazingly gory given the PG-13 rating, and a lot of animals and people, large and small, die.

I have a soft spot for this movie because of how much my daughter and I loved the Brie Larson character. My daughter is a photographer (at one point she leaned over and said, “That photo is going to be blurry because she didn’t use a long exposure”) and a nature lover and as a mom I couldn’t ask for a better role model than Brie’s character. She’s dedicated to her art, she uses it for a purpose, she’s tough, she’s compassionate, she’s a nature lover, and she never screams. There’s only one moment in which she is Too Dumb to Live, and that’s when she’s too busy taking pictures to run away. As the mother of a photographer I can say that this is a legit character flaw.

Brie Larson with a flare gun and mysteriously perfect hair
The real mystery of Kong: Skull Island is not: How does this tiny island support this kind of ecosystem? The real question is: How does her hair stay so perfect?

Alas, the other woman in the movie doesn’t fare as well. One of the members of the science team is an Asian woman who is a biologist. She has only a handful of lines and none of them involve biology.

People, I saw this movie with a panel of experts. In addition to my daughter the photographer who kept commenting on the framing of the shots, I saw this movie with my husband, the biologist.

There is no fucking way that a biologist would visit an island full of previously undiscovered species and not have something to say about it.

This movie has a lot of characters and we only care about one (Kong). I understand that none of the characters will get much development and some won’t get any. But at the very least they could have made a running joke of the biologist feverishly talking to herself and writing shit down. We could have just heard little snippets of what she was muttering – “only two legs, both in front…tentacles….” As it is she’s not a load or a screamer. She’s fine. She’s just as token as token can get.

The one interesting thing about Tom Hiddleston’s character (other than the fact that he’s played by my sweetiekins) is that this is the most traditionally alpha male character Hiddleston has played, and most of what he does is defuse situations. He’s clearly prepared to fight his way out of situations but he also clearly prefers not to, and it’s pretty sexy to see him calming everyone the fuck down. It’s a nice, slightly subversive message.

Tom looks very confused
“Why am I here? I played Shakespearean roles! What am I doing with my life?”

Any trip to Skull Island has to deal with the native people who live on Skull Island. This version is progressive in the sense that the islanders are sympathetic, helpful, resourceful, friendly, and intelligent. It is not progressive in the sense that the islanders are literally voiceless – they communicate but rarely speak (probably they developed non-verbal communication to avoid attracting predators). As always, the story is not about them, which seems a shame. How intense would a story about surviving on the island full-time be? I’d watch it.

The supporting cast is fairly multiethnic, although all but one of the lead characters (Tom, Brie, John) are white. Pitting Tom and Brie against Samuel L. has some white savior overtones to it. So while this movie is much, much better at representation than other Kongs have been, it has a long way to go to be truly progressive in representing people of color. There’s no LGBT representation at all, but given the time and the military culture, that’s probably not surprising.

Of course, the point of Kong: Skull Island is that big monsters fight people and each other, and that is something that the movie does very well. The CGI is especially effective when it comes to Kong’s facial expressions and eyes, making him a character and not just a plot device. I don’t want to spoil the kinds of critters that appear but I will say that you should stay until the very end of the credits for the stinger.

If you have never before felt a deep love for giant monster movies, then this movie probably won’t win you over. However, if you do like movies in which large things fight other large things (Jurassic Park, Pacific Rim, Godzilla) then you’ll have a great time at this movie.

Kong: Skull Island is in theaters now and you can find tickets (US) at Fandango and Moviefone.

Add Your Comment →

  1. greennily says:

    I liked this movie because, frankly, I’d been expecting fas worse. But Kong was good, Hiddleston’s character was good, and Brie Larson was fine. Though, @Carrie S , what did your daughter say about trying to take a picture of Aurora Borealis with a black-and-white film?
    Also loved the songs and the whole Apocalypse now look. And I wouldn’t mind reading some well-written romance fanfiction about Hiddleston’s and Larson’s character!

  2. Kim W says:

    I really enjoyed this movie but I found myself wondering over and over again how Brie Larsen managed to carry enough film for all the shots she was taking.

  3. Crystal says:

    I went and saw this a couple weeks with my dad, because I’m his movie buddy (true story, my mom hates going to the movies so very much, and hates loud action movies so much that she called me and went, “Are you doing anything this weekend, your dad really wants to see that King Kong movie and I really don’t want to…you’re free Sunday? Oh, thank God.”). I really enjoyed it, which says a lot about conquering childhood fears, since I watched the original King Kong with Dad when I was about four or five, and spent the rest of my childhood dreaming about Kong eating me. I thought the story was actually pretty good, and I loved the cast, including my boyfriend Tom (my husband knows and accepts that we have a thing). I did have one constant scientific quibble, and I will give you a rundown of our post-movie conversation.

    “Okay, I have scientific concerns about Brie Larson’s hair. All that action, she never pulls it into a ponytail, which is impractical, and it’s gorgeous the whole way through. Somewhere along the line, it should at least have gotten messed up.”
    Dad: “Okay, let’s talk about Tom Hiddleston then. He looks like he stepped off of the cover of GQ the whole time. He gets shot at, napalmed, chased through jungles, and the tight teeshirt never so much as rips.”

    We’re fun. And yes, I realize that it’s odd that my brain accepted an uncharted island covered in kaiju, but I could not get past the hair.

  4. Megan M. says:

    I love this review and now I almost want to see this, meaning that if my husband put it on while I was in the same room I would likely pay attention and be entertained by it. I frigging LOVE Brie Larson. I’m so glad her character is amazing. If anyone else loves Brie Larson, please watch “Short Term 12”. It’s on Netflix and it is great (rated R, lots of swearing and adult themes, etc.)

  5. Elizabeth says:

    Elevator Summary: What if King Kong were in Apocalypse Now/ Heart of Darkness but only as I sort of remember it from high school?

  6. I am not convinced necessarily that I want to see this in an actual theater, but oh my yes I will be watching this on TV once it’s rentable. 😀 Because I DO love me some monster flicks, and I DO love me some Hiddleston, and having Brie “Our Future Captain Marvel” Larson in the lineup is a bonus.

    It sounds like at least none of the scientists were screamingly stupid, so that’s good. Promotheus set my low bar for “stupidest scientist characters to ever try to science”.

  7. Darlynne says:

    My sister went to see it this week and I passed. Maybe it’s my frame of mind lately (I hate everything), but I’m so tired of watching humans/men going to a place/planet and killing/trying to kill/harass anything that scares/threatens/annoys/talks to them. I am Team Monsters all the way. I’ve been on the Kong ride at Universal Orlando and am cool with that being the extent of my knowledge. But I am glad everyone else had a good time.

  8. JWS says:

    Angela Highland – Prometheus was impossibly stupid and I HATED that movie. However, I have two adolescent boys who might actually enjoy this Kong movie. Tom and I have hit a rough patch since the whole Taylor Swift thing but we’re moving past it. I’ll see it in the theater, maybe.

  9. JWS @ #8: “Supposedly smart people being mind-bogglingly stupid” is not THE top thing that’ll turn me off of a story, but it sure is up there on the list, yeah. My entire household hated Prometheus in no small part specifically because of that.

    I noted the HiddleSwift pairup, but fortunately for me, I have a dearth of giveable damns about that, so Tom hasn’t yet burned through all his Loki cred for me. ;D

  10. Ariadna says:

    @Darlynne I’m the same way. 🙂

  11. EC Spurlock says:

    Every time I see John C Reilly in this I keep thinking he’s that crazy Dharma guy from LOST. I keep waiting for him to look at Tom Hiddleston and say “This isn’t your island, this is Kong’s island. You only live here because he lets you live here.”

  12. marjorie says:

    Yeah, you lost at me at “Tom Hiddleston’s clothes stay on all the way through the movie.” I’m good. I’ll just watch The Night Manager again.

  13. This is such a great review! The couple of things I might add:

    I think the movie effectively elicited an emotional response (from me at least) thinking about the destructive nature of HUMANS, more so than anything else. Especially when they’re bombing the crap out of the island. And that really frustrated me, but almost in a good way.

    I DO think that everything about this movie was very nicely representative of the time. The sentiment of the soldiers was really well portrayed (all the way from the “I want to go home” to the “I’ve been fighting in this damn war for nothing” to the “I’m bat-shit crazy and just want to kill things some more” to the “We’re great friends now and have so many crazy inside jokes.”) But I think even the way we do science and care/don’t care about nature and how that has changed — I can TOTALLY picture a group like this forming back then and having a legitimately plausible proposal to drop bombs on an island to measure geographic pulses or whatever. It’s not something we would ever propose (believably) today, but I can see it not phasing anyone back then. And that made me sad, but also kind of impressed from a writing/developmental team perspective.

    Again, I LOVE your review! 😀 And you were SPOT ON by saying that you won’t remember the character names. My husband and I referred to EVERYONE as their roles.

  14. chacha1 says:

    I too am always Team Monsters. When “In the Heart of the Sea” came out I was thinking “I would sit through this hoping all the humans die.”

  15. Demeter says:

    I thought this movie was screaming its agenda but your need for more items on the agenda list is mind boggling.

    White savior versus S.L.Jackson. Multi-ethnic cast but not enough!
    No LGBT representation.

    Were you watching a movie or filling out a sociology class scorecard?

    Is your review satire? If so, good one.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top