Other Media Review

Movie Review: Far From the Madding Crowd

RHG and I went (separately, alas) to see Far From the Madding Crowd.  I (CarrieS) have read the book, and RHG had not.  Far From the Madding Crowd is a drama set in the Victorian period about Bathsheba Everdeen, a prosperous farmer with three very different suitors.  Here are our impressions:

RHG:  WHY ARE DUDES.  WHY ARE DUDES THE FUCKING WORST.

CarrieS: THE CLOTHES I WANT THEM.

Also, I vote we have a total moratorium on people kissing while sun sets or rises between their heads.

So, let’s get this party started by talking about dudes and why they are the fucking worst.

May I present Troy, AKA Sergeant Douchebag:

Sarg Douchbag, looking douchey.

 

RHG:  Oh my god, Troy.  You’re so gross and so invasive and terrible and Jesus Fucking Christ two minutes into their meeting I was like “You have to kill him.  Right now.”

 

CarrieS: I know, right?  I think he’s really miscast, because for us to believe that Bathsheba would fall for him he should at least have charm.  Think of the guys that have played Wickham in P&P adaptations – yes, we the audience see right through them, but they are cute and charming.  Troy couldn’t even master “charming rogue”.  He was unrelentingly gross.

 

RHG: You know, given that his first actions upon meeting her in the wood were to essentially go “look, I could totally kill you, but you’re perfectly safe but I could totes kill you” is… I don’t think he’s a charming rogue at all.  He’s invasive in space, in ”I know what you want, what you really want want and I’m gonna threaten you with a sword, LIE ABOUT IT, and then grope you against your consent” and he’s a total dick, there is nothing charming about this guy in words or actions, so to expect an actor, any actor, to pull it off… no.  Just no.

As Maya Angelou said, “When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE THEM the first time.”

Honestly, Bethsheba.

 

CarrieS: Just to be clear to our readers, I’ve read the book and RHG has not, so movie comments are limited to the movie unless otherwise stated.  Troy is, believe it or not, SO MUCH WORSE in the book.  SO MUCH WORSE.

So why does Bathsheba fall for him?  In the book, it’s a combination of lust and his manipulations of her.  In the movie, I just can’t picture lusting after that guy.  Why do you think she loses her marbles over him?  Is it because he has the possibility to “tame her” and this relationship is sort of a subversion of Fifty Shades of Gray (i.e. she thinks she wants to be tamed but she wants the fantasy of not having to be in control but not the reality)?

 

RHG: Good lord IDK. Like, he’s pretty, I guess (but with sketchy taste in facial hair) but she wouldn’t be the first girl to get all tingly in her lady parts over a scarlet coat.

I don’t really understand what it is about this girl that gets dudes to propose to her after a sentence and a half of conversation.

 

CarrieS:  OK, so we can sum up our feelings about Troy by saying DIE DOUCHEBAG DIE.  What did you think about Boldwood?  Again, the movie softens him – the actor brought a lot of humanity to the part while still being faintly creepy – until his full creepiness is revealed.  Jesus Lord, that is a ton of handwringing about one Valentine.  She said she’s sorry, dude, can we move on?  Apparently, no.  What did you think of him?

Oh, and BTW, I think some of the instant proposal thing has to do with thinking of marriage in a business way, but also I would TOTALLY propose to Carey Mulligan’s version of Bathsheba minutes after meeting her.

 

Carey Mulligan wearing a gorgeous dress, sitting by a gorgeous dog, looking gorgeous.

 

RHG: Michael Sheen does not play dudes that are good at letting go.  Yeah, he was faintly creepy and not great at understanding a soft no.  I groaned when she was like “…yeah, sure I’ll, um, think about it” as a way to extract herself from an awkward conversation.

 

Boldwood, looking weirdly hot for such a creepy dude.

 

CarrieS:  Bathsheba has a hard time just saying, “NO HELL NO” – unless she’s firing baliffs, and even then you could tell it was totally freaking her out but she had resolve and did it anyway.  She has that same problem a lot of us do – she wants to be nice, she wants to make people happy, so just saying “NO HELL NO” to a puppy-eyed Michael Sheen is beyond her.

 

RHG: I do like how Gabriel (who yes, is adorable) was patient, but not necessarily waiting for her to get her head out of her ass.  He did tell her at the beginning that look, I’m gonna leave you and this farm at some point.  But he wasn’t being the nice guy hoping that just because he covered her grain with tarps (FUCK YOU TROY IT’LL RAIN WHETHER IT’S YOUR RECEPTION OR NOT ASSHOLE) (sorry) or saved her sheep meant that he figured she owed him, you know?  Yes, he loved her, but it wasn’t just her ass he was saving, it’s was every one who relied on that farm.

She really didn’t have much in the way of “please” and “thank you” and “I’m sorry” in her vocabulary, did she?

 

CarrieS:  I have SO MUCH to say about Gabriel.  First off – yes, he’s not the kind of “nice guy” who thinks that if he inserts enough niceness coins into the vending machine then sex will fall out (Boldwood is a great illustration of that).  He’s nice because he truly likes and respects Bathsheba and his fellow workers and he genuinely cares about their well-being.  He’s also not a doormat.  He’s the only character who respects Bathsheba’s boundaries.  When she say she won’t marry him, he doesn’t press for days or weeks or years.  He accepts it.  But he does demand that she treat him with respect and civility, as shown when he quits and won’t come back unless she asks him nicely.

 

Gabriel Oak and Bathsheba, making my ovaries hurt.  KISS, YOU FOOLS!
CHEMISTRY ALERT

 

I love it that in this movie love is expressed through caring action, not lust, charm, fancy words, or riches (or even “interesting pigs,” a line that made me ridiculously fond of Boldwood despite my determination to hate him).  Love is hard.  It’s not glamourous.  The fact that the most romantic thing Gabriel does is de-bloat sheep made me ridiculously happy.  We don’t see enough of that kind of expression of love in the romance genre, and I think it’s very true in real life.  My life is much cushier than Bathsheba’s, and I do love it when my husband does something traditionally romantic.  But what ties us together in marriage tends to be much more messy – shitty diapers, cleaning up barf after the kid had the flu – a lot of fluids, now that you think of it.  Shared, un-glamourous, messy labour.  It doesn’t get enough love in romance and  it’s so well-handled here.

 

RHG: No sheep farts?

 

Carrie: Alas, we have no sheep.  We’ve had farting and incontinent geriatric dogs and cats who not only farted but also shit all over the floor, so I feel we have animal farts covered, thanks.

 

Gabriel with sheep (platonically)

 

RHG:  Ultimately, I did like it- the aesthetic was perfectly “not the London upper class” set (though I did want more interiors of the house and how it was laid out), and the golden light and some of the shots were beautiful.  The random shot of the snail on the flower?  Totally random, gorgeous.  I really wanted Bethsheba to kill Troy (after all, he had a razor sharp sword RIGHT THERE) but I’m super bloodthirsty and she is not.

Show Spoiler
Having Boldwood do it and remove both himself and Troy from the love dodecahedron was a bit tidy, but hey, Troy’s dead, so whatever.

I have not read any Hardy, though not overly punishing his heroine for sexual desire was unexpected.  But really.  Why are dudes.  They fuck up everything.

 

CarrieS:  I loved Carey Mulligan’s version of Bathsheba but I also wanted to shake her a lot – honestly, Bathsheba, you have a man who will debloat a sheep for you RIGHT THERE.

What did you think about Bathsheba, RHG?  Feminist icon?  Blithering idiot?  Some of both?

 

RHG:  Some of both.  Her determination to run her farm, and insistence of selling her grain herself (and not taking a shit price for it) and getting her hands dirty and getting shit done?  That was awesome.  Knowing that marriage would make all of that difficult?  Also awesome.  Falling in with a dude who had no redeeming qualities while not getting any sense of him or his life?  Bleech.  That was dumb.  (I kinda wanted her and Fanny to get together and take Troy down.)

Bathsheba, taking no shit

CarrieS:  Did you have a hard time following the story?  I wasn’t surprised that they cut a lot of the book, and sometimes I thought it worked – but other times I blinked and all kinds of stuff had apparently occurred and was dispensed with in a single line.  It felt choppy, especially the later part of the middle.  So I wondered if it felt rushed or choppy to you.

 

RHG:  No.  I mean, yeah, seasons tended to happen pretty quickly, and that Old George is one long-lived old doggie, but in general I kinda wanted things to move quicker- I was a bit bored by the end.  There were some pacing issues.

 

CarrieS:  Grade?  I loved it, I’d give it an A-, although that’s partly because I adored the two leads so much that I overlooked some of the weaknesses.  Oh, fun fact – I saw an early screening in a packed theater, and usually when I go see period dramas it’s me and three 80 year old ladies, all of whom are very quiet.  It as fun to see this with an audience that was every bit as vocally appreciative of the movie as the crowd that saw Age of Ultron the next day.  It definitely affected my experience of the movie to see it with that kind of energy in the audience.

 

RHG:  I was in a theater with five other people.  I don’t understand why going to movies alone gets such a bad rap- I see like 95% of movies alone.  If I waited until someone had time to see a movie with me, I’d never go, and that is unacceptable.  (Also I got a lot of great previews so this is gonna be a fun summer).

Oh, right, you wanted a grade.  Um.  A-.  Strong female lead, delightful boy in contrast to gross dudes, beautiful cinematography, and hey, very rarely did we get two dudes talking about anything other than a woman.  HOW DOES IT FEEL BOYS.  HOW DOES IT FEEL.

 


 

Far From the Maddening Crowd is in theatres now, and you can find tickets (US) at Fandango and Moviefone.

Add Your Comment →

  1. I’d been debating whether to see this. Thanks for the review! Will definitely be checking it out now!! 😀

  2. Dr. C says:

    Friends-
    The book is fantastic-(!!!) and I enjoyed the visually-stunning film, though it is more like ‘highlights from FRTMC. In your reviews you tend to take the novel out of context and apply 21st Century sensibilities to characters who can not behave in the way you ask them to. Keeping in context of late Victorian ideals and gender performances, the novel is pretty ahead of its time. Troy is horrific yes (!!!), but he is exciting (that sword? oh please!), so he’s the bad boy, motorcycle guy whom the heroine attempts to tame,(think Heathcliff from Wuthering Heights and Willoughby from Sense and Sensibility), and once the ride is over- richer relationships are in store. She (as a late Victorian character, and not a 21st century woman), has that ‘experience’ so she may develop a richer understanding of what she wants and most importantly, doesn’t want. Ironically, (when I teach this novel in my Victorian Literature classes), many students are more creeped out by Boldwood. They feel he is a creepy stalker, rather than a desperate man uncomfortable with love and loving. Thomas Hardy is a wonderful writer- happy to see this film!

  3. Andrea D says:

    Yay! I’m so glad to see that you guys enjoyed the movie. I’m seeing it this weekend, and while I’m predisposed to liking it since I love the story, it’s nice to see your recommendation. Most of the reviews seem favorable too. Though one of our newspaper reviewers made me mad because he said that Carey Mulligan wasn’t beautiful enough for the role (compared to Julie Christie), and he was lukewarm on the film. Thankfully, I tend to be almost completely the opposite in taste from him (seriously, his recommendations are like disincentives for me to see movies).

    I may come back here for squeeing after I see the movie because the people I’m dragging along with me to see it are not as excited about it as I am, and if I love it as much as I’m hoping I will, I may need an outlet for rapturous bliss.

  4. kkw says:

    I haven’t seen the movie, and probably won’t. I don’t enjoy movies made from books I like. (I prefer movies where things explode, like Mad Max which was great fun!)

    I just have to chime in because it drives me nuts that Hardy has a reputation for punishing his female characters. He was rebelling against the constraints of his time, not celebrating them. He wasn’t like, she has the lustypants so terrible things should happen to her, he was like, what the fuck is wrong with the world that a little totally natural lust is relentlessly judged and punished. He was pilloried for having heroines with sexual feelings – those sorts of women were supposed to be villains, if such unnatural women could exist at all.

    Why does Bathsheba feel such angst forever over the valentine? Not because Hardy thinks she ought to. So much of the point is that society needs to move it along already, and get its judgments the hell out of our love lives.

    Hardy thinks she should be able to be infatuated with a douchebag without having to marry him. He thinks she shouldn’t be judged as unworthy just because she has the hots for a douchebag. Apparently he wasn’t just ahead of his time, he’s still ahead of ours.

    I get a little exuberant in my Hardy proselytizing, I know. But seriously. His books are so good. So. Good.

  5. Dr C says:

    kkw- I totally agree!

  6. RuthC says:

    Paging Dr. C! This might be my only chance to ask an actual professor of Victorian literature my burning question about FFTMC. Why did Hardy name his heroine Bathsheba? It’s such an unusual name. The only other Bathsheba I have ever encountered is the Biblical one, and she is only a victim of men’s desires. In the Bible she isn’t given a chance to have, much less act on, any desires of her own. I’ve always wondered at the contrast between the totally obvious name Oak and the contradictory Bathsheba.

  7. glee says:

    I urge you both to watch the 1967 film with Julie Christie, Terence Stamp, Alan Bates, Peter Finch. This movie made me want to visit England — never before on my visit lists. And amusingly enough I said that to an Englishwoman and she laughed and told me it was filmed in Ireland. Anyway, this movie taught me that books and movies will be forever different because you can’t make the ending work as well in the movie as in the book. Not to mention that both the Sargeant and the shepherd are just yummy.
    from imdb http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061648/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_40

  8. Lady T says:

    I did watch the 1967 film version recently(part of a rereading challenge at my blog) and Terence Stamp as Troy is all kinds of delicious sexy. He’s still a jerk but you can see why Bathsheba falls for him there.

    Glad to hear that this new adaptation is worth seeing(some of the reviews I read were less than enthusiastic),plus in reading the book now, I can totally picture Michael Sheen as Boldwood. He has that intensity which makes even his far from appealing characters worth watching.

  9. Doug Glassman says:

    You just know that during the production of this film, there had to be an attempt to get Jennifer Lawrence to play Bathsheba solely because of “Everdeen”. (I’m assuming Katniss has that last name as an homage to this book.)

  10. Lizabeth S. Tucker says:

    I haven’t seen the film yet, but I did voluntarily read the book when I was in high school. Understand that I was a huge classics reader. I’d read War & Peace. I’d devoured and enjoyed Crime & Punishment. I adored all things Dickens. I read Homer and Beowulf and The Canterbury Tales and Dante’s Inferno. Loved them all.

    But Far from the Madding Crowd was extraordinarily boring with way too much description. In fact, I would up reading only right hand side pages as the edition I owned had most of the descriptions on the left hand side.

    Based on your review, I don’t this this is my kind of period film. I’d be yelling “Kill him!” at the screen whenever Troy was in sight.

  11. Bona says:

    I didn’t know this movie was coming! It looks really interesting and I think I’ll watch it ASAP.
    Hardy is one of my favourite Literary authors, and I like this book especially because of its happy ending. The majority of his novels are so depressing!
    I also saw the 1967 film, with great movie stars -Julie Christie, Terence Stamp & Alan Bates. I guess you cannot avoid comparing one another, but this remake looks very interesting, more realistic about the landscape and the way of living.
    There’s something good when the actors are not so popular -you see Bathseba, and not an impossibly beautiful Julie Christie.
    The weak point, from what I infer from your review, is the Sargeant. Terence Stamp was so attractive! You clearly saw why she fell for him. Handsome, powerful, dangerous. The actor of the new version looks quite I don’t know -bland? if you compare them.

  12. Thomas says:

    I remember the original film was doubtful about the new one but really enjoyed it.

  13. […] is a good movie for people who liked Crimson Peak, or Far From the Madding Crowd (or just really wanted a blend of those two movies). I also hear that there are a couple of […]

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top