Book Review

Guest Review: The Austen Playbook by Lucy Parker

NB: We received two different reviews for this book, and thought both perspectives were interesting and thoughtful. We’re sharing both to encourage discussion and to highlight different expectations and results of reading anticipated books – and we definitely want to know what you thought, too!

This guest review is by Catherine Heloise.

Previously, Catherine ranted about Shakespearean rockstars and loved Chase Me by Laura Florand. She has a food blog called Cate’s Cates, where she creates allergy-friendly treats, and she also runs the Stories Under Paris website, where she creates fictional stories based on the names of Paris Metro stations. How cool is that?

The Austen Playbook is ridiculously good fun, and this review is probably going to devolve into a Book Squee at any moment. The fourth book in Lucy Parker’s London Celebrities series, The Austen Playbook centres around Freddy Carlton, who we first met as a cheery 19-year-old in Pretty Face. She was described there as a West End veteran, who had been on the stage since the age of eleven, and a reliable workhorse who ‘missed brilliance by a hair’s width.’ Freddy is now in her early or maybe mid-twenties and has been playing increasingly serious parts, in preparation for the ultimate role – that of Marguerite, the manipulative, iconic anti-heroine of The Velvet Room, the most famous British play of the 20th century, which just happens to have been written by Freddy’s own grandmother, Henrietta.

But no pressure there…

The trouble is, Freddy’s heart really isn’t in these serious roles, and while her father (who is also her manager) and her family haven’t cottoned to this yet, one person has. And that person is London’s grumpiest TV presenter and theatre critic, ‘the witty wanker behind the scathing reviews in the Westminster Post,’ James Ford-Griffin.

“Even when she had her words straight, she was phoning it in. She’s losing her spark. Until a few years ago, she was still getting kiddie parts, and mostly took roles in musicals and drawing-room comedy. She danced and bounced her way from curtain to curtain, it was exhausting to watch, and audiences bloody loved her. Then she aged into adult characters, switched direction into pretentious bullshit like High Voltage, and obviously hated every moment of it. For some reason, she’s pursuing a determined line in the high-brow dramas, when she’d clearly rather be stamping about in puddles in Singin’ in the Rain.”

Griff, as he prefers to be called, has some pretty good reasons to be grumpy. The task of keeping his family estate together has fallen onto him, and this task is not helped by his brother Charlie’s hare-brained schemes. Worse – it is actively hindered by his parents’ insistence on building elaborate dolls’ houses out of the costliest of materials, which they sell for rather less than cost. Having been pressed into the family rescuer role from the age of twelve, Griff has a distinctly jaundiced view of sunny, creative types like Freddy, or indeed Charlie (who is so like Freddy in temperament that she regards him as her ginger, five years older twin).

Charlie’s most recent hare-brained scheme is to reopen the estate theatre (which was originally built for Henrietta Carlton, with whom their grandfather was having an affair), and use it to host a one-off, live-to-air performance of an audience interactive play, The Austen Playbook. This is a Jane Austen-meets-country-house-murder-mystery mashup, where at the end of each scene, the audience votes on the direction of the story and I want it to exist so much, because it sounds amazing. Mind you, it also sounds like a nightmare to perform – the script is so long it ‘makes War and Peace look like a novella’, as the actors have to learn multiple variations of every scene, not knowing which they will be called upon to perform until minutes before they reach them.

Freddy is offered the role of Lydia Bennet, which she gleefully accepts, and the story is off and running.

There is a lot of plot in this book, far more than we have seen in Parker’s other work. In fact, in that sense, the book reflects the play being performed – ‘it’s fun, it’s funny, it’s a bit of whodunnit, a bit of snogging under the stairs.’ And some of the twists and turns in the plot do almost feel as though they were chosen by a mischievous audience. In particular, the ‘hero and heroine are stranded in a spooky gothic house overnight’ scene is one that *this* audience member would certainly have chosen. It’s one of the most laugh out loud parts of the book, and initially feels as though it doesn’t fit with the rest of the story (though in retrospect, it works brilliantly as a Northanger Abbey homage) – but in fact, it is vital both to the romance and to the mystery plot. Indeed, Parker does an excellent job of juggling a lot of complicated plot threads and difficult characters; it does sometimes feel as though the balls are certain to be dropped, but everything does get caught in the nick of time…

There are a lot of difficult and painful family dynamics in this book, made more complex by the slow emergence of family secrets as the story evolves. Much of Freddy’s character arc revolves around her trying to come to terms with the fact that what she wants for her career and what her father wants for her career are not compatible things – and Freddy, while incredibly direct and brave in her romantic life, has never really been able to say no to her father, who saved her life as a child and was seriously injured and lost his career in the process. Meanwhile, Griff, who is otherwise a dangerously perceptive individual, has put his younger brother firmly in a box marked ‘useless’, from which his brother spends much of the book trying to escape. It should be noted that the hare-brained scheme that starts the book is actually significantly less foolish than it appears at first glance.

One of the things that I love most about Parker’s work is that she knows how to write a character who is super nice without being saccharine. Freddy is a lovely, sweet, kind, optimistic person who sees the best in everyone, wants the people around her to be happy, and is determined to do the right thing at all times. She is also extremely sarcastic and has no problem whatsoever giving as good as she gets when dealing with Griff:

“I’ve never see anyone do DIY in a tie.” Freddy glanced at the beam he was fixing, then walked over and bent to grab another handful of nails from the bag at the foot of his stepladder. She held them up for him, and after a pause, he took one and drove it into the wood with one vigorous bang of his hammer.

“Thanks.” He pulled another one from her raised hand. “The cast is here, then, are they?” His tone conjured images of empty chocolate boxes, and the aftermath of a party, and missing the bus by thirty seconds, and all of life’s fleeting moments of gloom.

“Dude. You might want to dial it down a notch there. The enthusiasm is embarrassing.”

He caught his finger with the hammer and swore again. She’d always thought he had a very inspiring vocabulary.

“If you are going to be rude enough to visibly grasp for patience,” she said, “I would suggest keeping your eyes open. At least while you’re whacking nails into a board.”

Griff, on the other hand, while sarcastic, cynical, decidedly Slytherin, and more than a little misanthropic, does genuinely care about the people around him, and he is one of the most reliable heroes you will ever come across. His habit of viewing himself as the only sensible person in the room – and honestly, once you meet his parents, it’s impossible not to have sympathy for this opinion – and Freddy’s surface resemblance to the flightier members of his family, do cause conflict between them, however. Griff is in the habit of just fixing things behind the scenes, and Freddy, whose own family members share Griff’s Slytherin tendencies, has had about enough of being seen as a silly young thing who can’t handle her own problems. In his defense, Griff doesn’t actually see her like that for very long… but a lifetime of being the fixer is hard to overcome.

The romance between Freddy and Griff is delicious. The chemistry is just there from the start, to their mutual bewilderment, and they also figure out very quickly that they really do care about each other. Their first kiss is absolutely electric.

“I don’t know why I find you so beautiful now.” He’d regained control over his pitch, and he said it like he was commenting on the weather, but the words fell into the silence between them with the impact of a heavy weight shattering a piece of glass.

Freddy dropped her hand and stared at him, and he turned his head. As compliments went, it was a bit backhanded, but somehow it didn’t come across that way.

There was a moment of quiet breath and assessing eyes.

“I don’t know why I fancy you so much,” she said, with equal frankness.

And then a few minutes later:

“I promised not to interrupt your work,” she said, on the exhale.

“Yes.” A familiar note of the sardonic, which was actually a relief in the current tension. “That lasted about as long as I expected.”

She cast him a look over her shoulder. “Foresaw this, did you?”

“No. This definitely wasn’t the scenario I imagined.”

“I expect not. After all the very gallant things you’ve said about me over the years. Just think, if this had happened earlier, you might have given me a better review for Masquerade.” She reflected on that for about two seconds. “No, you wouldn’t.”

He snorted and said at the same moment, “No, I wouldn’t.”

The relationship feels pretty solid pretty early, despite the various bumps along the way. One thing I love is that while their love makes them happy, it doesn’t change who they fundamentally are. Freddy is always going to be the friendly, optimistic Hufflepuff, and Griff will always be the grumpy, sardonic Slytherin, and they enjoy each other that way. Yes, Freddy needs to become a bit more ruthless in protecting herself (her willingness to lay herself completely open is frankly terrifying to Griff), and Griff does need to soften and begin to value his brother, but fundamentally, both personality types are validated.

There is also a persistent defense of frivolity and fun as a part of life – one that is just as important as ‘worthy’ drama. Here’s Freddy early in the book:

“I like to make people happy, I like to hear laughter and see them leave smiling and humming the songs. I like popular fiction of all kinds and I think it’s just as important as the lit that gets taught in class…. Parts of life are shit enough. I look for the light where I can find it.”

It’s a very Northanger Abbey moment – Henry Tilney would certainly approve. And it’s worth noting that Griff, the serious theatre critic, never suggests otherwise, even at his most grumpy.

I love this book. It’s laugh-out loud funny, the central relationship is sweet and awkward and hot, and there are just so many delicious details, from the extremely unusual aesthetic tastes of Griff’s grandfather, to the unexpected depths found in some of the minor characters. As always, the dialogue is a delight, and really begs to be read aloud. (You have to use your best Alan-Rickman-playing-Severus-Snape voice for Griff, though. It’s the rule.)

But perhaps I’m being too effusive for a book inspired by Jane Austen. Perhaps it would be more apt to say, with Henry Tilney:

“It is only a novel… or, in short, only some work in which the greatest powers of the mind are displayed, in which the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the happiest delineation of its varieties, the liveliest effusions of wit and humour, are conveyed to the world in the best-chosen language.”

Did I mention that I loved this book?

Grade: A, for Absolutely Delightful and Adorable and Also I read it twice in a row and then read it out loud to my husband.

This book is available from:
  • Available at Amazon
  • Order this book from apple books

  • Order this book from Barnes & Noble
  • Order this book from Kobo
  • Order this book from Google Play

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well. Thanks!

The Austen Playbook by Lucy Parker

View Book Info Page

Add Your Comment →

  1. PamG says:

    Great review! It’s always fascinating to get different perspectives on the same book.

  2. leftcoaster says:

    At this point I basically have the first 3 books memorized, given that I’ve read them multiple times and then listened to the audio versions while recovering from an unexpected surgery. I was really ready for another!

    This book did have a LOT more plot than the previous books, and it was presented in this very zany way which kind of clued me in to not take it too seriously. I loved all the homage bits to Austen and I didn’t mind what I thought was the set up for the next one (My money is on Sabrina and Nick Davenport as our next couple). I quite liked it, although all the family and your assigned role vs. your true self stuff hit a bit close to home and some of it was a tiny bit painful to read.

    I loved the real talk about sex Freddy has with Griff. That was a delight to read. You could tell it was a romance because his responses were so spot on perfect 😉 I loved the way the author showed the ways the connection between them deepened and grew, along with a healthy dose of nearly instant chemistry. I also loved that neither of their personalities significantly changed just because they loved each other.

    I did not love the one-dimensionality of the villain. I had trouble understanding her motivations and she ended up being a bit cartoonish for me.

  3. You know, I find reader opinions about the one-dimensionality of villains interesting. I almost never have a problem with it, mostly because I know several Sadies in real life. They’re not cartoonish to me, but very real. Not every villain is going to be a Loki, who is ridiculously nuanced and almost heroic at times. Sometimes, I just want to unambiguously despise someone and not have complicated thoughts about their secret good side!

  4. Space Cadet says:

    I appreciated both of the guest reviews for The Austen Playbook, though Catherine’s matches my opinion more closely. I adore Lucy Parker’s books and have re-read the first 3 several times. The Austen Playbook will be my go-to summer romance re-read from now on.

    leftcoaster—I agree that Sabrina is the likely heroine of the next book, but I’m not sure about Nick as the hero since the story wouldn’t be as clearly rooted in the theater community with two TV presenters as the main couple. My first guess for the hero is Dylan, the actor who played a surprisingly good Darcy. He’s kicked around the periphery of the series as an irritant to other characters, but the end of the book was a possible setup for his kinda bad-boy ways to be reformed. On the other hand, Sabrina and Nick have more of an enemies-to-lovers vibe…damn, I’m already impatient for the next book!

  5. Isi says:

    I suspected a Sabrina and Nick romance too! I actually thought when he wanted to talk to her after the scene with her boyfriend that he was jealous and now wanted to comfort her – it seemed like a setup for one of those stories. I was dead wrong, of course. Now I wonder of Lucy Parker would really try to build a redemption arc for him. I’m not a fan of forgiving people who did asshat things just because they fall in love… Parker has so far been very good at giving us “grumpy” heroes who are never really arrogant, thoughtless or dismissive jerks. And that goes double for Dylan who’s been a sexist douchebag for several books!

    Aarya: That’s really an interesting perspective. I’ve never known any people like that, so I’m much more weary of them in fiction. Bitchy comments or acts, sure, but everybody I know acts differently in other situations and has other motivations rather than just being mean. I do, however, get their function in a book. I just wish they had some attributes or lines that were not so stereotypical. And the stereotypes are often pretty sexist too, that’s what bothered me about Sadie. (Of course, real people act like stereotypes too)

  6. Deianira says:

    @Aarya: I hear you. I’ve been subjected to a couple of Sadies in real life too; in one case, I lost my best friend thanks to one, & in the other, she was a sister-in-law & thus impossible to avoid. (Interestingly, both were women.) I’ve found, though, that if someone’s been fortunate enough NOT to experience that personality type, they tend not to understand that it IS a type that exists. While I DNF’d this book for other reasons, Sadie rang absolutely true to form for me.

  7. OK says:

    I was thinking Sabrina and Nick too – definitely a story Lucy Parker can do well!

  8. J E says:

    This book was perfection – will probably be on my top 5 list of the year. Great review!

    I also agree with Aarya, though – I used to work with someone like the villain. Mean just for fun, hell if you got on her wrong side, sneaky and dangerous. May you never encounter one of those!

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top