Book Review

Movie Review: The Water Diviner

I’ve always had a fascination with World War I, partially because we barely spent any time on it in school- there was Franz Ferdinand, and trenches, and mustard gas, and then everyone got together and decided it was Germany’s fault, and then there was a Long Afternoon and then WWII happened. Even when I try to sort through, well, everything? I get bogged down in the hot mess of geopolitics and shit. The stories of the people who lived and died through it, though? That’s the history that I’m interested in.  And it’s horrifying.

This is a WWI drama about a father who lost his three sons to the Gallipoli campaign, and goes, after the war, to find their bodies and bring them home. It definitely made with an Australian audience in mind- there’s no explanation of the Gallipoli campaign and it’s larger context in the war. Ultimately for the movie it doesn’t matter, but it made me realize that literally what I knew about Gallipoli was that it was in Turkey, and ANZAC forces were involved. Also maybe it didn’t go well? (Spoiler: it didn’t.)

So Russell Crowe plays Joshua Connor, a farmer in Australia who is able to reasonably guess where to dig wells. He uses intuition, and divining sticks, and luck – maybe a little psychic abilities- (and does say later on in the movie “I have dug a bunch of dry holes, too”). Four years after Gallipoli, and a year after the war ends, his wife dies and he makes the trek to find his boys. He spends time in a hotel in Istanbul, where he meets Ayshe, a woman who doesn’t believe her husband is dead, and her ten year old son, Orhan. He makes his way to Gallipoli (illegally) where the Commonwealth Graves Commission is in the process of finding the war dead and burying them as best they can. They are helped (somewhat under sufferance) by a Turkish Major, Hasan, who lead some of the troops during the battle and is able to pinpoint where trenches were, where engagements happened, and where one can expect to find bodies. Turns out that maybe one of his sons survived the battle, and the hunt goes on from there.

There’s more to it, but that’s the gist: it’s about trying to find some sort of closure to everything that happened in WWI. Or, for the Turks, about figuring out who they are when the war never stops, and when your former “Ottoman Empire” identity no longer exists. It’s about what happens to you – “you,” the soldier, and “you,” the country- when the war is over.

That’s the thing that’s really really interesting- there’s no bad guys. There’s no glory. There’s the awkwardness that ensues when the British occupy Turkey, and some people want Turkish independence, Greece wants to invade, and others don’t want to forget that just a year ago everyone was fighting everyone else. Hasan wants to help Connor, not because he’s sorry about what happened in the war, but because it’s the right thing to do: he’s the only father who came looking.

When asked what he did before the war, Hasan says that for Turkey, there is no before the war. It’s been war his entire life, and even if WWI is over, Greece is invading, so… there’s just a continuation.

The movie opens with the Turks making the final run at the ANZAC trenches after (as it turns out), the ANZAC evacuation/retreat (which one it was depends on who you ask). That really sets the tone, as this is not a “yay rah rah ANZAC patriotism!” There’s a point where Ayshe yells at Joshua that this isn’t his place, he doesn’t understand their traditions, he’s not there to save anybody. She’s right: he’s not a white savior and the movie doesn’t think he is. Hasan and his BFF ask Connor what part of the Ottoman empire Australia will get when it’s carved up, and he says that Australia has enough land: “We fought for a principle.” I note that he doesn’t explain what the principle was, and Hasan and his BFF are like, “That’s a pretty fucking stupid reason for this shit, dude.”

It’s not a perfect movie- the pacing is a little weird and the whole third act is like, okay we’re going to escape the Greeks now! While Hasan is played by a Turkish actor, I don’t believe many of the other Turkish roles are played by Turkish actors, so… that’s a thing.

A friend of mine who is a combat vet also saw this movie, and mentioned on Facebook that if you have combat-related PTSD, this may be a movie you want to skip. Crowe doesn’t water down the battle scenes. They are brutal and horrific, and there’s a soldier who screams all night as he’s dying. So keep that in mind.

I will admit that I like Russell Crowe. I’ve liked him since Gladiator, and even though he’s had some PR issues, he is one of those celebrities who becomes a better person when you follow him on Twitter. (Seriously, a few weeks ago he did this story about a hat he saw a man kick down the street and it was one of those random surreal things and I think about that story a lot. IDK.) He’s generally pretty honest about his limitations (he said that the live singing in Les Mis did not do him any favors) and he’s been talking about this movie on Twitter for ages. I’ve been REALLY curious to see it and having to wait EVER SO PATIENTLY for it to come out in the US.

There’s an interview Crowe did with CBS where he talks a bit about his approach to filmmaking. The interviewer asks if he’d consider not directing himself, and Crowe points out that if he tells the studio that he, Academy Award Winner and 3 time nominee, is in the movie, he gets WAAAAY more money. Which is something I’d never really considered before and maybe I’ve been a little hard on Ben Affleck.

(…nah.)

Anyway, this is a new breed of war movie, and has already won Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor for Yılmaz Erdoğan, and Best Costume Design at the Australian Academy awards. I do recommend it, but it is a massive punch in the gut.


The Water Diviner is in theatres now and you can find tickets (US) at Fandango and Moviefone.

Add Your Comment →

  1. Kay Sisk says:

    For another look at Gallipoli, the NZ TV series Anzac Girls, is an eye-opener from the nurses’ point of view. Based on real stories, at the end of the final episode you find out what happened to each woman.

  2. Silver James says:

    This movie is older, but as my military officer and historian husband said at the time, “Yeah…this. That’s pretty much how it happened and what war is like.” GALLIPOLI is brutal to watch and if anyone hates Mel Gibson, be aware he played one of the young men who joined up to fight. Still, it’s worth digging up to see if one is really into war movies and wants a feel for the event and times surrounding it. GALLIPOLI – IMBD

  3. Bona says:

    I was one of those who saw Peter Weir’s Gallipolli in a movie theater so I had a little idea about the ANZAC being there.
    This kind of movie is just something I love. And as a Russell Crowe’s fan, I just have to see this film.
    It hasn’t been until I saw recent documentaries about WW1 that I realised that this could have been the ending of Churchill’s career.
    This awful fiasco was -in part- his responsability, and the reason why he was demoted from First Lord of the Admiralty. I think that’s why the how or the why of Gallipolli Campaign is not explained very frequently or in detail. Nobody wants to think that all this people died for a not very clever idea supported by Winston Churchill.

  4. Sarah says:

    “When asked what he did before the war, Hasan says that for Turkey, there is no before the war. It’s been war his entire life, and even if WWI is over, Greece is invading, so… there’s just a continuation.”

    ^ What a profound statement. My parents were refugees who came to the US in the mid 70’s during the Vietnam War. Before that, they grew up in a place where war was their constant. Some European country was always occupying their country and finally it ended with them escaping the communists with only the clothes on their backs. War has forever shaped their habits and views on life. This movie looks really good but I have a hard time watching war movies because it feels too real to me.

  5. Cristiane says:

    If WWI and its aftermath really interests you, the French movie “Life and Nothing Else” (La Vie et Rien D’Autre) (1989) is wonderful. Beautifully directed by Bertrand Tavernier and featuring a great, great performance by Philippe Noiret (best actor Cesar award; probably best known in the US for his performances in “The Postman” and “Cinema Paradiso”). Here is the IMDB synopsis:

    January, 1920. 350,000 French soldiers remain missing in action. Major Dellaplane tirelessly matches the dead and the wounded with families’ descriptions. Honor and ethics drive him; he hates the idea of “the unknown soldier.” Into his sector, looking for her husband, comes a haughty, politically connected Parisian, Madame Irène de Courtil. Brusquely, Dellaplane offers her 1/350,000th of his time, but as their paths cross and she sees his courage and resolve, feelings change. After he finds a surprising connection between her missing husband and a local teacher, Irène makes Dellaplane an offer. This man of action hesitates: has he missed his only chance?

    It’s really worth seeking out.

  6. laj says:

    I second the recs for Gallipoli(not really a Gibson “movie”) and Life and Nothing Else. Both are phenomenal films.

    Just seeing the trailer was enough to know this a Russell Crowe “movie”…..no thanks!

    Good review.

  7. Milena says:

    Thirding the Gallipoli recs. And it was made before Gibson really became Mel Gibson, plus this was made at the time when Weir was at his best.

  8. Roya says:

    I second Christiane’s reccomendation of “Life and Nothing But”, it is extremely good and much better than the Audrey Tatou movie “A Very Long Engagement” which touches on many of the same issues, but wasn’t as good as the original Sebastien Japrisot novel which I loved.

  9. Cathy says:

    I was lucky enough to see a pre-release screening of this movie with a question/answer session afterward with Russell Crowe in person in a tiny theater in NYC as part of the NY Film Critics Series a couple of weeks ago. My friend & I made the mistake of thinking that the q&a would be first and when offered the opportunity to be in the front row next to Russell, we jumped at it. Unfortunately, the movie played first – I felt like I was IN those battle scenes! They were graphic and would have been a visual and sonic assault to my senses even if I hadn’t been so close. That being said, I loved the movie. Loved the character he played. Loved the supporting cast. For a directorial debut, I think he did a good job. He was fascinating discussing everything from his love for making music, to being accosted by fans, to his process acting and directing. He has such a mesmerizing presence despite being a bit overweight, middle aged and having self-deprecating sense of humor. I think I’m in love 😉

  10. Bona says:

    As Cristiane has mentioned Bertrand Tavernier, whose pictures are just amazing, and the topic is WW1, I’d also recommend one of my favourite titles from the 90s, Capitaine Conan (1996).

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top