Other Media Review

Movie Review: The Light Between Oceans

For your melodrama pleasure, Dreamworks presents you with a smorgasbord of gorgeous views, sad people, a lost baby, and crashing waves.

As World War One winds to a close, Tom Sherborne (Michael Fassbender) returns to Western Australia to take a position as a lighthouse keeper on an island off the coast . He’s haunted by the war, and thinks the idea of being all by himself on an island for six months sounds GREAT. He meets Isabel (Alicia Vikander), and after a short but heartfelt courtship, they marry. After being unable to have children, a baby washes up on the island (in a boat, not just, oh, look, here’s a swimming baby) and things take a melodramatic turn as they informally adopt her and then, after a few years, the question of who does this child belong to raises its head and things get messy.

Let me first reassure you that the baby lives and once she’s out of the boat, she’s not in any actual danger. I promise you, the baby is fine.  All of the tension is centered around the adults and their choices, not the safety of the baby.

There’s both a lot going on and not much going on – it’s mostly the story of choices and consequences and how long you have before your life catches up with you. Isabel pretty much decided that Tom was the man for her when she saw him the first time (the fact that there’s a decided lack of dudes is mentioned in a throwaway line), and once she puts that idea in front of Tom’s face, he’s pretty quick to agree.

They have a nice little life on the island, and it’s not long before Isabel is pregnant, but miscarries twice in quick succession. She wants a baby so badly, and feels like once baby Lucy arrives, it’s a sign. They don’t tell anyone that this baby showed up, and let everyone think that Lucy is her own baby (the timing mostly works, even though it’s clear that Lucy is a few months old, not early, but okay, we’ll go with it).

The performances are great- I am an Alicia Vikander fan (which should be clear, as I’ve talked about her movies a few times in these parts), and she’s just getting better and better as her career goes on. Both miscarriages are on screen, and both are traumatic in different ways, and she reaches every emotion and can communicate them with the set of her jaw. I wouldn’t be shocked if she got another Oscar nomination (I don’t really expect it, either, it’s a bit early in the year for true awards bait movies).

Michael Fassbender is a fine actor – I don’t like him, but I can’t deny that he’s good at what he does (he is also a jaw tension actor). Tom is a broken person in many ways, and Michael knows where all those cracks are.

The other main character is Hannah, played by Rachel Weisz, a woman who lost her baby at the same time Lucy arrived on the island. Hannah is in the midst of profound grief, and Weisz is another actor who’s career has just gotten better and better – I loved her in The Mummy, and I would not have expected this from her in 1999 (I love her so much).

I’ve talked a bit about how the 1920s were a global period of PTSD, and how the Jazz and the Bright Young Things were one manifestation, but there’s also the quieter form of trauma. The waves sound like guns, there’s a distinct lack of young men (Isabel had brothers, and wonders if there’s a word for a sister who no longer has brothers), everyone is refusing to talk about it, and in all of the not talking, everyone is screaming. The idea of the next generation who has the chance to remake the world is everything, and Lucy is just such a happy baby.

The main weakness of the movie is that the pacing is just so slow. In terms of act structure and story, it’s great, but things could be a bit tighter, scenes could end a little sooner, vistas could be appreciated a few seconds less. It’s not a major complaint, I just found myself sighing a few times, “We get it, the ocean is beautiful. GET ON WITH IT.”

Some critics have complained that it’s too melodramatic, but that’s what it is! A melodrama! The ending is happyish, searching for forgiveness, and emotionally satisfying. If you like melodrama, lighthouses, and/or Alicia Vikander, this is for you. If you find miscarriages traumatic, this is not for you (both are gut-wrenching).

Oh, the other reason to see this? THE KNIT WEAR. SWEATERS. COATS. SHAWLS. OMG.  (Yes, Elyse knows.)

The Light Between Oceans is in theaters now and you can find tickets (US) at Fandango and Moviefone.

Add Your Comment →

  1. Harcourti says:

    Whether or not I like the film, it is very exciting that it was filmed at Stanley which is in the far North-West of our island. I should probably go just for that reason. The same reason I went to see Arctic Blast with Daniel Jackson of the excellent arms from Stargate. That was set in the capital in the South. Terrible film, but it was all about spotting the streets and landmarks and even people we knew!!!

  2. Kay Sisk says:

    After reading the book, I was interested in seeing how closely the film followed it. It does. I took my husband to see it, not knowing what his reaction would be, but as he’d golfed 4 days in a row, I thought a two hour movie and dinner out was justified. He liked the movie so much he’s told all his friends about it! Who knew?

    Yes, it’s melodramatic and yes, it’s supposed to be in Australia but is filmed in New Zealand and part of our liking may be that we’ve been fortunate enough to visit both countries. A B+ is a fair grade and thank you for reviewing it.

  3. I saw this the other day because I LOVE Michael Fassbender, and I wanted to see him as a romantic lead. (I liked the movie, but also thought it was too long. I fell in love with Alicia Viklander. Also having had 3 miscarriages and 1 still birth due to premature labor, that scene where she realizes she’s losing her second pregnancy ripped my heart open. I was openly weeping in the movie theater as her and Michael Fassbender’s conveyance of emotions was so realistic. I remember my husband beside me in the hospital room begging God to stop and asking me what could he do. ALL. FREAKING. FEELS. (I had my own happy ending that didn’t require childnapping.)

  4. BS says:

    @brooklynshoebabe Know it happened back a way, but lots of internet hugs all the same for the grief you and your husband carried. Glad you got your happy ending.

  5. Spot on review! I also felt the pacing was a bit slow. I love both Michael and Alicia, as both are excellent actors. Have to admit, part of me wanting to see this movie was that they fell in love making this movie and are still together.

    The friend I brought with me has an adopted child and she was weeping through most of the second half.

  6. This isn’t a movie, but have any of you ladies of the Bitchery been watching the new Chesapeake Shores series based off the Sherryl Woods novels?

  7. Thanks for the review. I found the book very moving, and now I’ll likely see the movie when it comes to OnDemand.

  8. chacha1 says:

    This is a great piece of writing right here:

    “I’ve talked a bit about how the 1920s were a global period of PTSD, and how the Jazz and the Bright Young Things were one manifestation, but there’s also the quieter form of trauma. The waves sound like guns, there’s a distinct lack of young men (Isabel had brothers, and wonders if there’s a word for a sister who no longer has brothers), everyone is refusing to talk about it, and in all of the not talking, everyone is screaming.”

    Thanks. I can’t really find entertainment in work of this nature, but it sounds like it deserves to be seen/read.

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

$commenter: string(0) ""

↑ Back to Top