RITA Reader Challenge Review

Back in the Saddle by Karen Templeton

This RITA® Reader Challenge 2017 review was written by Mandi. This story was nominated for the RITA® in the Mid-Length Contemporary category.

The summary:

A SECOND CHANCE IN THE SADDLE

All widowed veterinarian Zach Talbot wants is to raise his two boys in the peace and quiet of his New Mexico town. Who’d have thought that being roped into helping a woman choose a horse for her son would upend the single father’s whole world?

Except ex-actress and rodeo rider Mallory Keyes isn’t just any woman.

With its wide-open spaces and sky that goes on forever, Whispering Pines is the ideal temporary haven after the accident that changed Mallory’s life forever. Falling for the sexy, caring man who found the perfect palomino for her eleven-year-old wasn’t in her short- or long-term plans. Zach’s also determined to get Mallory back in the saddle. Can she return the favor by helping to heal the still-grieving vet’s heart?

Here is Mandi's review:

So basically, this is your typical vows-never-to-love-again widower father meets ex-rodeo princess turned ex-famous movie star turned wheelchair-using recluse story. Unnecessarily complicated backstory aside, I had surprisingly high hopes for this book. I mean, how often do you actually find a book on Amazon with a 4.9 out of 5 rating–much less a series romance? Unfortunately, due to its lackluster plot and problematic main characters, the book didn’t even meet my relatively low expectations, much less my high hopes.

The book started out well enough, and, before I had even finished the first quarter of the book, I had already written a not-quite-glowing-but-still-positive review in my head. However, the more I read the more annoyed I became. After the initial setup the story itself seemed to crawl with minimal plot development and underwhelming conflict. It definitely felt like the story was stretched out in order to hit the required page mark for a mid-length contemporary.

However, this book’s greatest sin was the main characters. Please note, I didn’t say characterization. I am referring specifically to the main characters. Some of the secondary characters were fairly well done. I first realized there were problems with the hero and heroine when I realized that I was more interested in the hero’s brother and his fiancé’s interplay/story.

The most unfortunate thing is that there was so much potential here as the heroine, Mallory, had such a rich backstory to mine from–and I’m not referring to her ex-starlet past. To be fair, I do appreciate how the book portrayed the wheelchair-using heroine as a strong person. It was refreshing to not have this type of character portrayed as a victim in need of rescuing. I just found her to be somewhat unrealistic, flat, and inconsistent.

To be fair, again, at the time that I was reading the second half of the book I was also dealing with my six month old who was dealing with not-yet-pneumonia. So I was admittedly cranky. But rather than serve as an escape, the inconsistency associated with the main characters in the book just annoyed the crap out of me.

The scene where the heroine realizes she loves the hero is a perfect illustration of why. There had already been a big-to-do earlier in the book about how the heroine’s situation had increased her empathy:

Mallory smirked. “You know what’s strange? Ever since this—” she gestured toward her lap “—I have a much harder time seeing other people unhappy. Almost like…”

“You can feel their pain?”

“Maybe.”

“That’s hardly surprising…. Considering how hard you’ve worked to regain your own equilibrium, it’s no wonder you’re more empathetic.”

But, despite our heroine’s empathy super power, the fact that she put another person’s feelings before her own was how she discovered she was in love.

…glad he couldn’t see the tears brimming on her lower lashes. Not for herself, though. For him.

Which could only mean one thing—

Yep, she was in love, all righty. In a way she’d never been before. In no small part because she’d never known a man like this before. Well, poop.

Unfortunately, the book was riddled with such inconsistencies. Even more unfortunately, I couldn’t get past those inconsistencies enough to actually enjoy the book. However, as I do appreciate the positive, if inconsistent, portrayal of the heroine, (and the fact that most readers probably won’t be as cranky as me) I would give it a grade of C+

This book is available from:
  • Available at Amazon
  • Order this book from apple books

  • Order this book from Barnes & Noble
  • Order this book from Kobo

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
We also may use affiliate links in our posts, as well. Thanks!

Back in the Saddle by Karen Templeton

View Book Info Page

Add Your Comment →

  1. DonnaMarie says:

    Well poop, indeed. I have put another’s feelings​/needs over my own a thousand times. I have never equated it with being in love.

    Thanks for the review!

  2. AlliK says:

    It seems like most of this year’s SBTB RITA reviews are generally “meh” to downright negative. Am I wrong? Was this also the case last year? I’m really enjoying reading these reviews, so I’m wondering if the SBTB readers have higher standards or aren’t aligned with what the RITA folks are looking for or something else?

  3. Rose says:

    All righty?

    Well, poop?

    The tiny girl I babysit says these things to me when I tell her it’s pajama time. Does this work in an adult heroine’s voice? I am fascinated.

  4. LML says:

    @AlliK: I wrote the original comment last week, and post a shortened version here, for the same reason.

    Following another very good review of another very meh book I have reached the conclusion that SBTB should initiate its own annual award program.

    Considering the number of annual awards there are for mystery novels – 5 come quickly to mind – I believe romance could easily accommodate an additional award.

  5. Lizzy says:

    @Rose I (a late twentysomething adult woman) confess to using poop as my all pupose somewhat ironic nonsweary swear. I have the vocabulary of a sailor and decided sometime in the last year to replace the F bomb with something more G rated in cases of mild annoyance.

    Last winter I dislocated my elbow and was sedated during the setting procedure. My husband tells me that I responded to the doctor telling me they were having trouble getting my bones back I’m place with “oooohhhh pooooooooop.”

  6. AlliK says:

    @LML, excellent suggestion & sorry I missed your previous comment!

  7. Sonya Heaney says:

    As weird and childish as the expressions might be, I do know authors sometimes struggle with Harlequin’s rules on words. I’m not sure what the policy is with the Special Edition line.

    In this case – if there are restrictions – I might have said ‘she swore’ or ‘she cursed’ instead of using ‘poop’. But then ‘poop’ isn’t a word we use in Australia, so it always sounds weird to me…

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top