Other Media Review

Outlander Episode 6: The Garrison Commander

Outlander posterSummary:

Holy mary mother of god. 

Claire, after her week of contemplating her answer to Hot Redcoat, says she’s totally with the Mackenzie’s as their guest, and everything is fine, thanks.  Hot Redcoat is like “be that as it may, let us go talk to the garrison commander anyway, yes? Beeteedubs, this is not a request.”  Claire and Dougal ride into to the town the garrison has taken over, and Claire is escorted to the private dining room where the commander, a particulary snooty Brigadier General Sir Oliver Lord Thomas (who is about a cup of tea shy of saying “chip chip, cheerio!”) seats her down and feeds her a excellent dinner.  They make some really horrible remarks about Scottish people, Scottish accents, and the implications of being a barbarian there of.  Claire is feeling secure, given that THEY are British army, and SHE is British army and there it is; surely everything will be fine.

They agree to escort her to Inverness, from which she can head off to where ever she wants, and everything is fine, until Black Jack Randall stomps in saying that Dougal Mackenzie is down stairs being Dougal Mackenzie and oh, right there are rumors that they’re raising funds for a rebellion, and fucking DO SOMETHING SIR OLIVER LORD THOMAS YOU USELESS PIECE OF SHIT. 

Then he recognizes Claire, and things go off the rails pretty fast.  Claire tries to rationally explain that maybe Scotland is in a constant state of anger because of the whole occupation thing, and that’s perhaps not the most unreasonable state of mind, and the soldiers suddenly look on her as a possible traitor, not an innocent woman of Oxfordshire.  Then three soldiers get shot by Scottish rebels, and Claire runs downstairs to amputate an arm.

When she gets back, everyone is gone except Randall, and they have an amazing extended scene where she tells him she knows that he flogged a Scottish boy near to death, and he recounts it, complete with some extraordinarily realistic and gory flashbacks, while clearly having the biggest hard on of all time remembering it.  She implies that maybe redemption is possible, and he allows to it, causing all the book fans to go “…..wait for it…” and then he punches her in the stomach. 

Dougal comes in as Randal is goading someone else to kick her while she’s down, and is informed that he is to remit Claire to Fort William by dinnertime tomorrow or ELSE.  Dougal rides off with Claire to a sulfur spring, and has her drink, before asking, one last time, whether or not she was a spy.  She says “for fuck’s sake NO” and he believes her, because this is Saint Ninian’s spring, and a liar would get her gullet burned out by the fires of hell.  So the only answer is to make her a Scottish subject, by marrying Jamie. 

Jamie’s cool with this, and okay with her non-virgin state, as it means at least one person will know what they are doing when it comes to teh sex.  Claire opts to get shitfaced.  The audience opts to will the week to go by faster.

Elyse: MAKE IT NEXT SATURDAY RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!

We got the virgin line. My favorite line in the whole book. And Sam pulled off the embarassed but eager look SO well.

This was a hard episode to watch. The whipping scene was absolutely cringe worthy. When the blood was running down Jamie's back I kept thinking “He's gonna die” even though I know he doesn't.

And when Claire is kicked and punched? Ugh. It made my stomach twisty. I so wanted Dougal to kick some ass on her behalf even though I know that's childish.

But let's slow clap it out for Menzies. He did an amazing job as Randall. Randall's soliloquy about the “art” he made while whipping Jamie was just enough to convice me that he was batshit insane and that he had a boner the whole time he was doing it (and recounting it to Claire).

One of the things the show offers that the book doesn't is the Frank/Randall situation. In the book I know they look identical but they are such vastly different characters that I see them as different people in my head. On the TV show it's inescapable that this monster looks just like her husband.

Also can we talk about how disgusting Dougal's “grinding your corn” comment was?

And I really wanted a scene where Dougal pulls Jamie aside and is like “Look, you gotta marry Claire” and Jamie is trying to suppress his squee so hard. You know he was like “Yessssss”

RHG:  HOLY CRAP CAN WE GET A SLOW CLAP FOR TOBIAS MENZIES AND HIS EMMY REEL SUBMISSION.

HOLY SHIT. 

Look, I have liked him ever since Rome, and he's great in Game of Thrones but this is a whole new level to him.  Oh my god.  That was horrific and amazing and I love watching actors do their job so minutely and intimately.  And Catriona having the enviable/unenviable job of purely reacting to that master class he put on.  WOW.  Both of them, my god.  (He totally had a boner.)

The flogging scene was horrific- HORRIFIC.  I couldn’t even do my usual trick of trying to see the stagecraft behind it (which is how I dissociate to cope with these things) because oh my god.  I also thought the arm amputation was the most graphic one since Master and Commander

But jesus christ.  I can’t get over Tobias and Cat and how WELL he’s been differentiating between Frank and Randall.  I just can’t. 

I need a minute to compose myself. 

Claire instinctively relaxing in the presence of the British soldiers was really well done- she is a part of this Grand Tradition, and she almost certianly never thought about it in terms of what British Imperialism means for the people being occupied before.  And now that she has, she has this “well, if I just rationally explain it to them, they’ll totally get where I’m coming from!”  But the occupying force needs to believe they are better than the people they’re oppressing, and if this is what the English do to the Scottish…. I can only imagine what happened in India. 

Sam, you’re just adorable and the singular best and seeing him deliver that short scene in the most perfect way… That made the solid hour of tension a little bit easier to bear along with Claire stalking up the hill and grabbing the bottle of booze because… yes.  That is the correct response. 

Fucking Tobias, though.  (As I’m writing, Ppyajunebug is watching the episode and IMing her reactions to me, which is tense as hell and also hilarious. “HOLY FUCKING JESUS GIVE THIS GUY AN EMMY” “NOW”) 

Elyse: Agree that the flogging scene was… Yeah. When you could see the strips of flesh hanging…

I read somewhere that that scene is nothing compared to SPOILER the prison scene later in the season and I'm not sure I can deal, honestly.

RHG:  We’ll see how that goes.  I think the scene that is going to have people up in arms is the spanking/spousal abuse scene which I have many mixed and complicated feelings about and am actually quite looking forward to discussing it.

Amanda: I am already cringing. Obviously, they have to include it. But as Carrie said a few recaps back, Jamie is like a big golden retriever of a man. I get depressed just thinking about it. 

CarrieI’m a big fan of the show Orphan Black and I often say that my favorite part of Season One was watching Sarah, a con artist, try to guess the correct answers to “Yes/No” questions.  I had the same feeling while watching Claire madly try to spin her way out of that horrible room, which was so much more horrible because it wasn’t a dungeon but rather a haven of gentility. 

Has anyone noticed how good Claire is at adopting the speech patterns of the time?  I’m sure in the actual historical time her accent alone would have made her unintelligible, but her vocabulary and cadence fit the written word of the era quite nicely.  Extra points for use of “licentiousness” and “whoremonger” in the same sentence.  Points deduction for having a cover story that, while brilliant in many ways, is so easy to disprove.  Still better than my approach, which would have consisted entirely of peeing my pants.

Did Claire just give away where Jamie is hiding?  If the plan is that her marriage to Jamie makes her safe, doesn’t that mean that Jamie’s whereabouts will become known? 

All the Emmy’s to Tobias.  Also to the writing.  I was afraid Black Jack would come off as a cartoonish villain but between the writing and the acting he is all the more horrifying for being given character depth.  That thing he does with his teeth, the mood shifts, the coercion of the other soldier, the dropping the wine bottle out the window with that little smile, the conversation about how war has changed him (much of which he carries through for Claire’s benefit but much of which I think is true) – well played, Sir. 

Loved Claire’s reactions to the wedding culminating in grabbing the bottle of booze – but Claire, sweetie, try to summon up some enthusiasm here, you’re gonna hurt Jamie’s feelings!  And Jaime  – you are the cutest. 

As an aside – Claire pops up from the dinner table, performs massive surgery, and pops back again like, “Is there dessert?”  Cause she’s AWESOME.

Amanda: The opening song has turned into a total earworm.

I'm just going to air a common gripe, both in a fictional setting and a real one. I hate it when I'm asked a question, as though I have a choice, but I clearly don't. (i.e. Claire's presence being requested by the Charming Redcoat). We all know she can't very well refuse. And how many fanfics do you think have been spawned so far, shipping Claire/CR (Charming Redcoat)? That dinner scene…I suffered from severe secondhand embarrassment for Dougal and Claire.

Claire got a little saucy with Randall for a second, though I cannot stand him with long hair. I CANNOT AND I SHALL NOT! But hot damn, that jawline. It's a thing of beauty. I find the change in characterization between Frank and Randall to be so amazing. Tobias does such a great job that you forget it's the same person. And I know I'm not supposed to enjoy the tension (possibly sexual) between Claire and Randall, but I do and I'm admitting that here because it's a safe space!

I wouldn't normally describe myself as squeamish. There are few things I have trouble watching, like surgeries. Can't do those medical shows. No ma'am. But that flogging scene was rough, and it doesn't help that Randall, when he talks about his stomach fluttering and his legs shaking, is clearly getting aroused by it. He literally has no redeeming qualities. 

God bless the location scout for this show.

What a shame the phrase “grinding your corn” didn't stand the test of time…

Add Your Comment →

  1. Suz says:

    This episode was my favorite so far this season. The scene between Black Jack Randall and Claire was so compelling, I was glued to my seat. One of the things I’ve been loving about her portrayal is how flawed she is, esp wrt the drinking and short temper—these are the things that make her so incredibly relateable because they are the kinds of things that most of us would do in that kind of situation.

    I’m also finding the character of Dougal to be incredibly fascinating, mostly because I’m not sure if I love him or hate him. I pretty much wanted to stab him after The Most Pointless Attempted Rape Ever, but after the scene with the boar and his rescue of Claire from Jack Randall, he’s growing on me. Argh, dang you morally complex characters.

    Thank you, Bitch Brigade for your episode reviews. I’m always excited to read your take on the episodes. You always offer up insights that I never thought of (eg: Claire’s accent).

  2. Gillian says:

    No mention of the fact that Brian Fraser, Jamie’s father, was in the background of the flogging scene? I hadn’t noticed until I saw in the credits that there was in fact a Brian Fraser credited in the episode! Had to do some internet searching to verify. As a reader of the books, I realize this isn’t important until later, but come on! I feel cheated for not having seen him sooner.

    Also, I’m in complete agreement about Tobias Menzies…AMAZING! I’m still in awe a week later about this episode.

  3. Kilian Metcalf says:

    If you thought the flogging scene was bad, wait until BJR gets Jamie all to himself later on. Major squick. You won’t find fanfic easily because Gabaldon is rabid about not permitting fanfic. Too bad. ITA about Tobias Menzies. Couldn’t imagine any other actor in the role and was picturing him in my head the entire time I read the books.

  4. Jennifer in GA says:

    If you thought the flogging scene was bad, wait until BJR gets Jamie all to himself later on. Major squick.

    Yep. Hence my overall hatred of the book. It’s torture porn, pure and simple. There isn’t enough good in the book to outweigh all of that awfulness.

  5. ppyajunebug says:

    I’m just going to repeat a comment from the AVClub because it was amazing:

    I await the Claire v. Cersei drinking contest.

    Everyone place your bets now!

    My money is on Claire.  That Highland stuff has got to be way stronger than any of the fancy Westeros wine that Cersei drinks.

  6. ppyajunebug says:

    Also, everyone forgot the glorious line: “You’re a healer.  Surely you believe in the powers of magic.”

    I fully intend to use that line constantly in everyday life.

  7. mochabean says:

    Honestly the show keeps getting better and better, and it was pretty damn good to start.  Graham McTavish also deserves some love here for continuing to make Dougal such a compelling character (far more so than in the books, IMO).  He can dominate a room full of redcoats with just a glare, make BJR take a step back, and provide two very welcome moments of comic relief (“that she does” and “while I admit the idea of grinding your corn tickles me…”).  The writing for this episode was beyond amazing. In addition to the wonderful acting noted by all, so many great little moments—like BJR pouring the claret out and THEN dropping the bottle, and of course the moment at the end when Claire just grabs the bottle from Dougal and keeps walking. Changes from book worked very well I think, particularly the story of Jamie’s flogging being told from BJR’s point of view rather than Dougal’s.  Chilling and effective. Devastating episode, in the best possible way.

  8. Lammie says:

    This episode was amazing.  The acting was wonderful, the costumes were great, and even though I am a book reader I was on the edge of my seat for the entire episode.  TV Dougal is just wonderful.  I think Graham McTavish would have a great chance at an Emmy, if Tobias Menzies wasn’t doing such a wonderful job himself.  Really, all of the actors are wonderful – the casting people deserve an Emmy, if there is such a thing for great casts.  Maybe the SAG cast award?

    I am practically counting the minutes until Saturday’s wedding episode.  Jamie’s little laugh at the end of the preview for it has my ladybits all aflutter.

  9. Carly says:

    I think this was the best episode so far this season, without question.

    Also, I would like all of Claire’s knitwear, please and thanks.

  10. Daisy says:

    On the “grinding your corn” line: I laughed at Dougal’s colorful metaphor but then I was truly wowed by the writers when I realized that he gets it from the bawdy song the boys sing in the previous episode, about the miller grinding the maid’s corn: http://sangstories.webs.com/maidgaedtaethemill.htm
    In the book Dougal uses another agricultural image when he comes onto her later (“ploughing your furrow”).  Thus the show writers weave images from the book together with historically plausible details like the song—very impressive for just one line.  Or perhaps McTavish improvised it?  I agree his performance is fantastic.

  11. mel burns says:

    @Jennifer in GA: You’re not alone.

  12. Jen says:

    Sigh…RDM, the writers, the actors, the entire production team is just hitting a home run every week for me.  Love everything.  There could not be a better BJR than Menzies.  He’s just sublime.

    And yes pouring the claret out the window and chucking the bottle was good – but for me, BJR kicking the shit out of his boots and clothes while getting dust all over the damn room just to spite his CO was marvelous.  Never thought that character would make me laugh like that.

  13. Karen H near Tampa says:

    Jennifer in GA and mel burns:  And the Jamie and Black Jack scene wasn’t the only one in the book that qualifies as torture porn.  I, too, pretty much hated the book, though I did love the first (free) TV episode and I am reading these posts.  But I won’t be watching the show at all and I definitely haven’t and won’t read any except the first book (that I just am very thankful was free when I first got my Kindle so I don’t have to feel guilty that I paid to be made so unhappy by it).

  14. Jen says:

    Just a comment about the “torture porn” comments.  I can understand how violence in a book or other form of entertainment can be extremely upsetting for some people and stay with them long after they’ve put the piece in question behind them.  Those of you who feel this way certainly have every right.

    As a biased fan of both the books and the show I can’t help but feel the term “torture porn” is being misused.  Understandably, as a fan I’m not an objective voice on this.  But I don’t believe you can classify the Outlander book, even with the scenes you’re referring to, with things like the Saw and Hostel movie series – which are generally what the term “torture porn” refers to.

    I find the term to be one that passes judgement not only on the book/show, but also it’s fans.  I don’t enjoy Saw or Hostel or the like.  I find your implication that fans of Outlander are fans of “torture porn” to be hurtful and dismissive.  Neither a feeling I usually leave this blog with.

  15. CarrieS says:

    Just a quick reminder to keep comments spoiler free for those who are enjoying the show without having read the books.  This means that if I want to say anything about the show or book series, I should confine my arguments to events that have already happened in the show.  If I want to discuss things that happen later in the books, I’m gonna have to wait a while (which is killing me, BTW).

    I have broken this myself, I suddenly realize, when talking about why the book series appeals to me.  So it’s a good reminder for us all!

  16. CarrieS says:

    Re torture porn, as I understand the term, for the show itself to be torture porn it would have to exist solely to portray torture – pain and suffering would be the point, just as in sexual porn the story exists only to depict sex.  Additionally, the violence would be enjoyable to the audience.  Since most reviews talked about how difficult it was to watch the violent scenes, I’m not sure that applies.  Jack Randall is turned on by violence, but we are supposed to find his sadism horrifying.  I think you could have an interesting argument about violence as erotic given that Jamie always has his shirt off, but if anything I think the prolonged flogging scene was a subversion of that because of how it progressed through the act. 

    As far as individual scenes of violence, violence has served many purposes other than titillation so far in the show.  The attacks on Claire have shown how much danger she’s in and how few people she can trust.  They’ve also shown on one occasion that she can defend herself if given an opportunity.  The pillory scene showed how out of place Claire is in time, and it gave us a chance to see how differently Claire, Gillis, Arthur, and Jamie responded.  Jamie taking the younger girl’s beating showed his gallantry.

  17. SB Sarah says:

    @Jennifer & Karen & mel:

    I’m the Outlander virgin, as the others have termed me, because I’ve never read the books. I know of the scenes you mention, and wanted to ask – do you mean “torture porn” in the sense that there’s no purpose to those scenes being present? Or that they’re too graphic or too gratuitous vs. the romance and historical intrigue parts of the plot? I don’t want to mention specifics, but I’m curious about your point of view.

  18. Frankly this episode made me want to commit violence on the scriptwriter. Dear God. They sit around a table talking for 45 minutes What is this, an 18c My Dinner with Andre? (Yes, I know that dates me. I’m old and proud.)  A lot of clunky exits and entrances to get Claire alone with Randall and a lot of zzzzz blather and tears (is she really that naive? I also didn’t buy the line about her feeling safe with the army). Then bam, we get Black Jack in action and a voiceover to tell us her stomach hurt as Claire gallops away. Then the golden retriever in a skirt bumbles over to deliver one of the Big Lines of the Book and there is a general female dissolve.

    I’ve found the pacing in the series to be off, off, off all the way through and it’s a shame because visually and technically it’s beautiful to look at even if the costuming tips a hat to Etsy a bit too much.

    Nevertheless I’ll be there at 9 pm because I want to see some skin—unless of course, it’s two people sitting on the edge of a bed discussing their childhoods for an entire episode.

  19. Jennifer in GA says:

    I’m using the ‘torture porn’ very deliberately for that later scene, not for the entire book or show. When the show finally gets to that part, I’m interested in seeing the discussions justifying its inclusion in the book (and most likely the show). At this point we know and understand that BJR is just evil, pure and simple. How many more scenes are necessary to let the audience know this?  I won’t say anymore out of respect for the spoiler policy. 

    OTOH, I’ve stayed with the show (just like I stayed with the book) because there is much of it I’ve enjoyed.  Like most of you, I’m *very* much looking forward to the wedding.

  20. kkw says:

    Tobias Menzies is killing it.  Claire, on the other hand, is killing me.  Anyone else reminded of B- Timetraveller?  And how many times can that asshole successfully bait her? No, Claire, stop, don’t, shush, oh my god woman, noooooooo. Watching her talk about redemption was physically painful.  Which, you know, means this show is giving me feelings and making me care, so that’s good.  On the other hand, I’d rather have happy feelings, and I am not rewarded by the upcoming wedding because Frank! He’s waiting for her.  You guys, I’m serious, I want her to get back to Frank, and I don’t want to spoil anything for anyone, but I really don’t think it’s going to work out the way I want.  That’s really speculation, not spoilering because I forget everything I read.  Totes forgot Jaime’s a virgin, and that is such a memorable scene.

    Wading in on the violence…I’m a big fan of action and fight scenes, but not of blood and gore, which is a weird contradiction, but there you have it.  I don’t care for the floggings and the amputations and whatnot, and I think they’re a bummer in exactly the same way I think Saw is offputting, so torture porn seems like a fair call.  Worth noting that I don’t think there’s anything wrong with porn, and I hate seeing it used as a put down. I like gratuitous violence, gratuitous sex, gratuitous lunch, and free things in general because …I’m an American?  Anyway, no dis to the people that like it, or endure it, or can’t stomach it.  I love seeing the variety of opinions.

  21. mel burns says:

    @SBSarah:Jennifer in GA’s comment “There isn’t enough good in the book to out weigh all that awfulness” rang true for me. Honestly, I thought she was being sardonic, so I guess I’m totally ignorant of the term “torture porn”.  I have no knowledge of the genre Jen mentioned in her comment.
    As far as all the love for Black Jack Randall: A truly evil man…..so comments like Hot Redcoat are disturbing to me.  It’s confusing. Is all the love for Tobias Menzies or for BJK?

  22. Jen says:

    And this is why SBTB is endlessly fascinating.  The discussion above has caused me to step back and take a more objective look at a series I have loved and held close to my heart for years.  Having taken that step – I still think you’re all wrong.  I kid, I kid.  🙂

    The genre of torture porn as Carrie describes above is how I’ve always seen it defined as well.  It’s an actual genre term used for works devoted to gratuitous graphic torture.  In the same way that the set up of “a pizza guy shows up to find a horny housewife waiting to do him” is not a plot, just a set up for sex – the set up for things like the movies Saw, Hostel, and The Human Centipede (all examples of the horror subgenre of torture porn) are brief and exist only to get the audience to the torture.

    I don’t believe you can make an argument that the entire story of Outlander is only a set up for the scene we’re tiptoeing around trying not to spoil.  That is why I believe it is incorrect to label it as torture porn.  Whether you believe that scene is gratuitous is another debate entirely.

    Having said that, I also feel the need to come clean about my reaction to the term.  I have a very negative, visceral reaction to the subgenre of torture porn.  I think it’s an extremely disturbing trend and to have Outlander thrown under the same heading as something like The Human Centipede is more than a bit crushing for me.  I don’t think it’s fair to label the book/show as part of such a subgenre based on one scene.

    So I guess it’s all semantics.  I’m totally open to debates about whether the scene in question is necessary to the story.  But the labeling, when it doesn’t seem that those doing the labeling fully understand the background and use of the label is upsetting for me.  Having said that, it’s all about free speech baby and calling them like we see them.  The rainbow of opinions is part of what makes this site so interesting.

  23. Ginger says:

    @mel burns

    A truly evil man…..so comments like Hot Redcoat are disturbing to me.  It’s confusing. Is all the love for Tobias Menzies or for BJK?

    I think Hot Redcoat is the guy who “escorted” her to headquarters, not BJR.

  24. CarrieS says:

    Ginger is correct.  “Hot Redcoat” is so named (by me, anyway) because he shows concern for Claire’s welfare.  He’s the guy we first meet in the village and later meet with his uniform on offering to take Claire to the British Garrison.  Not BJR.

  25. mel burns says:

    LOL! That is just too funny……having not seen much of the series I just “assumed” ( and you know the old saying about that) by the conversation that it was BJR. I feel so relieved to have this pointed out……I was very disturbed…….had I not asked I would have gone on thinking so many of you were seriously deranged. I love SBTB…..it’s a good place to be:)))

    Thanks CarrieS!

  26. Jennifer in GA says:

    Having never seen Saw or Hostel, I’m working off this definition from Wikipedia regarding what exactly torture porn/splatter film actually is (and forgive me for not seeking out a better source than Wikipedia, but it’s not exactly a term I want to trust Google with, ya know? ;D):

    A splatter film or gore film is a subgenre of horror film that deliberately focuses on graphic portrayals of gore and graphic violence. These films, through the use of special effects, tend to display an overt interest in the vulnerability of the human body and the theatricality of its mutilation.

    and

    Splatter films, according to film critic Michael Arnzen, “self-consciously revel in the special effects of gore as an artform.”[3] Where typical horror films deal with such fears as that of the unknown, the supernatural and the dark, the impetus for fear in a splatter film comes from physical destruction of the body and the pain accompanying it

    Subsitute “book/television scene” for “splatter film” and I think that SOME of the writing and filming in Outlander fits that definition pretty accurately. If we take the case episode by episode, I think you can make a good argument that the entire episode of “The Garrison” is leading up to the visuals of Jamie’s torture at the hands of BJR- the way it was filmed, and the way BJR talked about what he did.

    When I read the book, I was able to understand that Gabaldon was setting the scene, characterization, all that, no problem. Violence and gore aren’t my cup of tea, but I understood *why* she was going there- until the Scene-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named. At that point it became nothing but gratuitous, graphic violence that was graphic and gratuitous for graphicness and gratuitousness’ sake.

    I would give the flogging scene- which by all reviews here and elsewhere is thought of as being absolutely brutal and horrorific, both in terms of writing and how the scene was shot- a hard 8 or 9 out of 10 on the scale of horrificness (with Claire setting Jamie’s shoulder and cleaning his woulnd being a 1). Admittedly, my tolerance might be lower than some, but I still think there is room to dial it back to a 5-6 and still convey BJR’s absolute evilness.

    And if you know what’s coming, it’s hard to understand why *it* needs to be a 15. It’s just not necesaary. And I definitely DO think you can make a strong argument that the whole book is leading up to THAT SCENE. (Which we will discuss when we get there!) And if you operate under @Jen’s definition coupled with what Wikipedia has to say- yeah, that scene is torture porn in my book. YMMV  

     

  27. gagging porn says:

    This blog was… how do I say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something which helped me. Thank you!

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top