Other Media Review

Outlander Episode 8: Both Sides Now

We switch a lot between 1743 and 1945, checking in with Frank and how he’s handling this disappearance of his wife. Basically: about as well as you’d expect. It’s been six weeks, he’s a familiar face to the Inverness police, and they keep telling him that it’s plainly obvious that Claire has run off with this Highlander dude he saw that one night. So go home, get drunk, and move on.

He’s been staying with Reverend Wakefield, and Mrs Graham (Wakefield’s housekeeper) finally says to Frank look, she went up to those standing stones, yes? Standing stones mark a place where weird shit happens.  I think weird shit happened. We also meet cookiemonger Roger Wakefield, the reverend adopted 6 year old son. He’s adorbs. 

In the mean time, Claire is in a total sex-haze with Jamie, who is delighted at the revelations of sex. They also meet Hugh Munroe, a beggar friend of Jamie’s who was tortured at the hands of Turks and has his tongue ripped out. He communicates with a beautiful sign language and I just want a show of Hugh going about his day. He gives Claire a piece of amber with a dragonfly in it as a wedding present. Hugh tells Jamie that there’s an English deserter who might be able to clear this whole ”wanted for murder” business. 

While camping one night, the party gets attacked by a neighboring clan. Jamie gives Claire his dirk, and they have a merry old time fighting off the attackers (Ned Gowan is particularly thrilled to have a Thrilling Adventure Hour). The next morning, Claire confesses that she dropped the dirk, which would have done her no good, since she doesn’t know how to use it. Rupert takes great pleasure in teaching her how to use a Chekhov’s Sgian-dhu (small knife) and where to stab a man so he’ll die. 

This being a high adventure story, she and Jamie sneak off to go bang in some bushes, and are come upon by two English deserters. They attempt to rape Claire, and she stabs him in the back and kills him, while Jamie is being held at gunpoint by the second. This shakes Claire out of her honeymoon/sex haze, and she has many feels, such guilt over cheating on Frank. 

Frank, in the meantime, has gone “fuck it” and is about to head off to Oxford, leaving Claire’s carefully packed suitcase behind, and instead drives to the stones. Because what if. What if Mrs. Graham is right.

The men go on to meet Jamie’s possible witness, and they leave Claire with Skinny Willie (that wasn’t INTENDED as dirty when I wrote it, but we’ll just let that stay there). Claire is grumpy, but then realizes she’s in eyesight of Craigh na dun. She takes off at a run, while Frank is running up the hill 200 years later (and seriously, this sequence is just so well done). They start hollering, and the stones allow an echo to get through, and JUST as Claire is about to touch the stone, she’s grabbed by English soldiers and taken to Fort William.

Black Jack is delighted to have his toy back. Claire tries to bluff her way out of the room, and it almost works, but Black Jack trips her up with the Duke of Sandringham’s marital status. He ties her up, tells hapless Private Hawkins, “Don’t come in this room, no matter what you hear” and cuts her bodice lacing. He has her bent over the table, knife to her nipple, when Jamie appears in the window with a gun, says, “I’ll thank you take your hands off my wife.” 

Black Jack has this incredible expression of “I WAS NOT EXPECTING THIS PLOT TWIST THIS IS AMAZING WHAT’LL HAPPEN NEXT?” And we cut to black, pondering that very question for the next SEVEN MONTHS. 

Elyse: I'm clutching my nipples. I'm having sympathy pains.

RHG: I DO NOT WANT THIS TO BE DONE UNTIL APRIL. THIS IS NOT OKAY.

Checking in with Frank was brilliant. I know there are certain people out there in the internets who are really angry about this, but knowing who this guy is that she’s trying to get back to, as opposed to “why on earth would she leave Jamie and his magic dick behind for this guy who’s kind of a dillhole” (even though- book spoilers- his dillhole-ness doesn’t happen until later, so I don’t really understand this argument.) 

Frank is the hero of his own story, and sadly, his story is a tragi-mystery without a happy ending. His wife vanished, and everyone in Inverness, save Mrs Graham, thinks she decamped with a random Highlander, leaving behind literally everything. People are trying to take advantage of him, and think he’s crazy for holding on to hope, and when he drives past Crag na Dun, he’s got one straw. And it’s one he doesn’t even thinks really exists. I feel bad for the guy. But the scene with Frank and Claire and the stones and the echoes – my god. 

I also really liked how the attempted rape was done- horrifying without being graphic, and more about Claire’s perception of events than about the audience being voyeurs about the actual thing that’s happening. Does that make sense? And Claire’s “I’m going into shock, this is shock that is happening to me right now” was perfect. I also really REALLY enjoyed the “lets teach Claire how to fight” scene, especially for Claire’s “DID YOU JUST” glare at Rupert. 

I keep wanting to go back to Frank though- I realized last night that he’s the BORING kind of historian. He’s got facts and dates and “this happened because of this and this was a result of that” but he’s got no imagination. He wants the tidy big picture, not the messy business of how people LIVED and WHY they did what they did. He just cares that the big events happened. Which is one reason he’s so annoyingly logical about shit. You know these types of people. I know these types of people. These types drive me crazy because they want to logic everything to death in tidy little boxes and you can’t DO that with history because history is people and people illogic themselves all the time. ALL. THE. TIME. Why else would people keep trying to invade Russia in the winter? 

I am totally delighted by Black Jack’s grin when he sees who it is that Claire married. Tobias is a genius and I want to bake the casting people a batch of bars as a reward. 

Elyse:  This episode didn't work as well for me. I think I was inundated by the rapey-ness.

I didn't like the disjointed way they filmed the attempted rape scene and Claire's shock. I could understand that Claire was dissociating without the camera seizures.

I did like the flashbacks (forwards?) to Frank though. The lengths he's going to to find Claire and the anger he feels at everyone's insistence that she ran off made him a very sympathetic character.

And OMG the Reverend. “She probably got washed down the river and has been living in a cave for 7 weeks eating lichen!” Although the Reverend and Frank's murder board was impressive. And little baby Roger!

Getting to see the Blackjack come out on Frank in the alley fight was interesting and I think important for the audience.

The Blackjack scene was just… Yuck. His joy at getting to rape and torture her. Her nipple! I'm still cringing.

Mostly I just need it to be April now, thanks.

Carrie:  Believe it or not, I didn’t see this episode, for various logistical reasons that make me weep. Here are some handy phrases I supplied my reviewing sisters with in my absence:

  1. Love the clothes! Elyse, please knit me that ______.
  2. Oooh, Scottish scenery!
  3. That Black Jack, what a rascal. Seriously – I hate him.
  4. Wow, what a plot twist! I didn't see that coming! This changes everything!
  5. I love that line when _____ says ______.
  6. Dougal, you are gross.

Did they apply? I’ve peeked at other plot summaries, and it sounds like at least some of them did. Although I suppose I can no longer even jokingly describe Black Jack as a rascal (it was mockery, I swear) and now must describe him as “Scumbag”.

I can’t speak to the issue of rape in this episode with much authority, because I didn’t see it, but I do have Thoughts. I have felt throughout that rape is over-used in the show. Poor Claire can’t walk down a hall without having to hit a guy with a chair. With something like this, a little goes a long way, and we are already well aware of how dependant Claire is. It’s her dependency that’s scary – she relies on the clan to protect her not from rape, but from starvation and death by exposure (to weather – although Claire has plenty of secrets that she can’t exposes as well). If the show runners want to build a sense of danger while Claire is under the care of the MacKenzie clan, here’s some other things they could highlight:

Claire has no money, right? None at all? Let’s talk about that.

What happens to people accused of being English spies?

What happens to people who run afoul of religious leaders because they are great at curing bizarre diseases? Why yes, I do know the answer!

As far as rape goes in this episode, one of the things Claire has a hard time grasping is that she is in the middle of a war. The show has been playing with the tension between “I’m in a romantic fantasy” and “I’m in a hellish war zone of deprivation and violence”. It sounds like “The Wedding” explored the idea of romantic fantasy and this episode blew it out of the water and reminded Claire that she’s not in shiny happy land. It is a horrible truth that rape has always been, and continues to be, a weapon in war – a way that one side tries to demoralize the other. I suspect, without having seen it, that the rape scenes were handled well, but I think the show as a whole would be stronger if it didn’t constantly default to the threat of rape as a way of showing that Claire is vulnerable.

Here’s Angelina Jolie talking about rape as war crime. It’s a youtube link – don’t read the comments.

 

RHG: And thus ends our coverage of Outlander until next April! Other tv events we’ll be covering in the future: Death Comes to Pemberley in November, and at the very least, Carrie and I will be covering Marvel’s Agent Carter.

We'll leave you with this.  Because we care.  

Tagged:

Add Your Comment →

  1. DonnaMarie says:

    The bff went all the way to Tinley Park to purchase sausage rolls so she could prepare a proper Scots supper before the big viewing. Atmosphere is everything.

    She, of the recently addicted and finishing book 3 this week, pointed out the part about how a lot of what was in the episode wasn’t in the book. To which I, having not read the books, thought, “well it should have been”. You need the juxtaposition of Claire’s honeymoon with Frank’s hopelessness and disillusionment. You really can’t grasp her desire to return home without seeing that someone desperately wants her back. The story telling here is absolutely amazing.

    Thank you for the parting shot, RHG. I’m just going to finish my coffee and stare awhile.

  2. Haha! Black Jack did have the IS IT MY BIRTHDAY look on his face when he saw Jamie, didn’t he? Oh well. Nothing good can come from that look. I liked the episode, even though I was a bit reluctant to watch at first, but it was a good experience overall.  I too, am a bit weary of Claire being put in rape peril over and over again. Not that I don’t know and agree that women alone faced exactly those dangers (and was the reason there were so many rules about women being alone with men)  but I’m beginning to feel hit over the head with it. I think the point’s been made and there were other interesting aspects that might’ve been filmed instead.

    And Frank’s part was so beautiful and heartbreaking. In terms of storytelling, it’s magnificent to show how Claire’s disappearance affected him and what he must’ve been going through looking for her. The run up to the stones and the subsequent close call is just masterful filmmaking, hands down. Having read the books, I admit that I appreciate the build up of Claire’s love for Frank so that it shows just how much the two of them end up giving up/losing.

    But, I’ll be waiting for April to roll around so we can get to the second half of season 1. Excellent recap as always!

  3. kkw says:

    I thought Claire *was* raped. I thought she was waiting in order to be sure she had the best possible chance of killing the guy, which was such a horrifying…choice isn’t the word I’m looking for…anyway, rape jeopardy is a relief compared to what I thought happened.  And I have to admit, I struggle to feel sympathy for Claire sometimes because she keeps making terrible choices (and I have no tolerance for people who can’t control their tempers), so having the reminders that awful unfair bad shit happens that she could not in any way deserve functions – as I’m sure it’s meant to – to bring me back to her side.
    I wanted her to be able to go back to Frank so much. I loved them running up the hill. I knew it wouldn’t work but I wanted it to so much (so much!) and it was good stuff.
    So I’ve forgiven the show for the last episode which I hated so much I swore I was through, only here I am waiting for April.

  4. Bea says:

    I agree with you all about the overuse of rapey situations. But I’m so happy we were able to finally enjoy an adaptation of Outlander. I’m so pleased with the care and thoughtfulness shown by the creators and producers! Let’s face it: it could have been done so differently. I’ve heard countless snide remarks on “a novel like those sold at drugstores, with Fabio covers”. GRRR… I’m so happy with the casting, the sets, the beauty of the locations and the amazing acting. I feel that we fans of the books are treated with respect. I love that women are in charge of writing and directing. It shows. It reflects on the quality and the feel of the story as it develops. Of course in a book to film/tv adaptations many things we love from the books are missing. It happens all the time. We cannot have a 100 chapters season with that quality. But I think the series has captured so far the soul of the book, the romance is a slow build and Jaimie’s character is being revealed by layers. And the hotness! I was a gonner since the first chapter when Jaime looks at Claire as she tended his arm and then his neck wound. Thans so much for that last pic! It made my day. April is just around the corner or so I tell myself to lower my anxiety levels…

  5. Elyse says:

    @kkw, in the book she is not raped. I agree in the show it wasn’t very clear what happened

  6. ohhellsyeah says:

    As much a I love the show, I agree that there is way, way too much rape. To be fair, that mostly comes from the source material. I do like the books but wish Gabaldon would come up with a new plot device.

    I don’t feel the show has done a great of developing Jamie’s character, so the extra Frank scenes did kind of irk me. The shot at the stones was beautiful, but a lot of the other scenes felt extraneous to me.

  7. redheadedgirl says:

    I hadn’t listened to the official podcast at the time I wrote my portions of this review, but Ronald D. Moore called it an attempt, not a completed rape. 

  8. Patricia M. says:

    Mr. Moore may call it an attempt but it looked like more than that on screen.  The rapist did not finish but it looked to me that he started.  I think the scene was important for Jaime’s development.  So far, his marriage has passed largely in a sexual haze.  Now something bad happened to Claire and he has woken up too. He has duties to Claire in his mind, chief among them the duty to protect her from harm.  He failed in that duty and has learned a hard lesson.

  9. Michele says:

    I think this rape attempt *was* important (or will be for plot points that are happening soon), but they could have left out the attempted ones during The Gathering. The Dougal bit needed to stay in, but in the book it was just a kiss and far less ominous.

    I didn’t mind the Frank stuff. It was plausible and very well done, and I realize that the show is trying to find the BJR in Frank and the Frank in BJR and that’s what the ambush was about. HOWEVER, I think it’s only justified if you have a two-hour episode. All of the Inverness stuff took time away from important Claire-Jamie stuff, from things relating to character and relationships and the nature of promises and the consequences of breaking them, that need to be established before a certain controversial action happens in what looks like episode 9 (after the break). I know a few people who have not read the books who don’t get why Jamie is even “a thing,” and I don’t think it’s Sam Heughan’s fault. Outlander is Claire’s story and we should still be sticking with her POV unless there is a really good reason to deviate from it. The Frank scenes just didn’t serve the narrative at this point, IMO.

    This was the only episode I had any major problem with, btw, and my beef was solely about story structure. The series overall is stunning and I can’t wait for April!

  10. Anne says:

    Thanks for the recap and the picture of Jamie.  I agree with RHG, I liked the Frank check-in, and the opportunity to see Mrs. Graham and Rev. Wakefield again, as well as the introduction of Roger Wakefield.  Although I have not yet seen Gone Girl, it was hard to escape the trailers and of course, contrast the way that Claire’s disappearance is handled in 1945 to the way that Amy Dunne’s is handled in 2010.  Today, Frank would have been the prime suspect.

    I find the choices made in the adaptation interesting—they keep both the attempted rape scenes and combine the sex scenes.  I was glad to see the fight with the Grants and the knife fighting lesson, although I think that it was TV Angus doing most of the teaching, not TV Rupert.  Overall, not my favorite episode of the first 8, but definitely looking forward to the rest of the season and also the adaptation of the second book.

    I will be interested to see how they handle episode 9 (when it finally gets here) because there are some pretty controversial scenes ahead (assuming that they stick to the books).

    I’m hoping that SBTB will post some suggested reading and tv watching for the hiatus (other than re-reading the Outlander series).

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

↑ Back to Top