Bitchin' Blog Posts

Need a news story? How about sex! And romance!

by SB Sarah | May 04, 2006 | Thursday at 7:57 pm | 31 Comments

More news outlets are picking up on the advent of erotica, which I worry will head for the shark now that more and more media heads are talking about it.

CBS2 Chicago has yet another news article about erotica, this time titled, Romance Novels Turn Up the Heat in Sex Sellers, in which, oh my, there’s hard core sex in erotica and romantica novels! Alert the press! 

The reporter spoke with Penny Dawn and Robin Schone as authors representative of the “new” genre, throwing in the following “News at 11!” panic line:

“Is it about time or are these sex sellers going too far?”

Too far for what? Last I checked, there was a physical end point to the vaginal canal. Unless his “sexy beast” is poking out her nose, and in which case I’d look to see if she’s inflatable, how far is “too far?”

To quote Candy: *le sigh* I love the effort to make news and scandal where there really isn’t any.

Now I know how Buffy fans felt when everyone started watching the show and making a big deal of it at the end of its run, when real fans known all along how good it was.

Filed: News, Random Musings, The Link-O-Lator

| |
  1. Jane said on 05.04.06 at 08:10 PM • [comment link]

    cut the station some slack.  When the VP is out shooting his buddies in Texas, you have to write about something.

  2. Jane said on 05.04.06 at 08:10 PM • [comment link]

    That should be “not shooting” not “out shooting”  Although the latter may be truer than the former.

  3. megan said on 05.04.06 at 08:46 PM • [comment link]

    There’s an interesting implication there that normal, average women are not into sex or don’t know much about it.

    For instance, they point out that one is a mother.  Where do they think her kids came from?

  4. Sarah F. said on 05.04.06 at 09:09 PM • [comment link]

    O.M.G.  Shoot me now.  “We did talk to some readers, but *understandably* they didn’t want to be on camera.”  Yeah, screw you.  I find that difficult to believe.

    And the letter from the husband?!  Nothing about the statistic that women who read romances usually have more sex and happier marriages than the “general” population.  My DH hunts out my favorite erotica authors.  He loves it when I read the stuff—especially M/M erotica, because that gets me the hottest—because he knows he’s gonna git some that night!

  5. ShuzLuva said on 05.04.06 at 09:23 PM • [comment link]

    Wow. It must have been a REALLY slow news night. That’s like when Fox 5 in NYC pulls out the “Health Hazard In the Microwave Popcorn Bag” story and runs it as the lead….

  6. azteclady said on 05.04.06 at 09:28 PM • [comment link]

    “Gabrielle’s Woman”???????

    oy vey

  7. Cynthia said on 05.04.06 at 10:36 PM • [comment link]

    At least there will be some folks who read the article and say, “Hmm…a juicy hot erotic romance sounds just like what I need. I think I’ll go to Waldenbooks/Borders and pick one up!”

    I go in streaks with my reading. I’ll burn through a lot of romances and then switch to Sci-Fi or mysteries to clean my palate. I had a long stretch where I wasn’t reading any romance at all just because I felt like I’d read every dogone plot there was and there didn’t seem like there was anything new. Then someone gave me a Lisa Kleypas and I was hooked back in.

    Sometimes knowing there is something really different and appealing out there will hook readers. While the “Sex Sellers” article is obviously flawed, hopefully some good might come out of it.

  8. Reese said on 05.04.06 at 10:52 PM • [comment link]

    This is marginally off topic - but I was surprised to see a new erotica column in Elle (Canada) magazine.

  9. Darlene Marshall said on 05.05.06 at 12:13 AM • [comment link]

    Oh, gag me!

    This is news?  To whom?

    I used to be a former tv news assignment editor and news producer. Not only is this not news because these books have been around for over 10 years, but you can clearly tell it’s sweeps week based on stories like this.

    And, I don’t think Robin was the first.  Jayne Anne Krentz’s Ladies Choice, ISTR, started with a sex scene.

  10. Sarah F. said on 05.05.06 at 01:06 AM • [comment link]

    Yeah, but Robin Schone’s book started with orgasm by masturbation, you see, so that makes it special.

    I liked Schone’s books for a while—they certainly opened my eyes about erotica about seven years ago, but right now, she’s a little overwrought for me.  Esp. the romance about the eunach (is that spelled right, because it looks wrong).

  11. Diane said on 05.05.06 at 02:51 AM • [comment link]

    Whenever I hear a bizarre promo like that, I always turn to the hubby and say, “Is it sweeps month?” And not too surprisingly, it almost always is. Sweeps month is when the viewing audience is calculated and advertising rates can be set accordingly. So it’s in every station’s interest to get as many people watching, no matter how they do it.

    Sweeps months are February, May, and November.

    So now you know how THAT silly thing got on the air.

  12. Melissa Schroeder said on 05.05.06 at 03:08 AM • [comment link]

    There’s an interesting implication there that normal, average women are not into sex or don’t know much about it.

    For instance, they point out that one is a mother.  Where do they think her kids came from?

    Silly, she doesn’t enjoy it, but does it to carry on the family name. She just lays back and formulates the grocery list.

    I write erotic romance, which has made my husband a bit of a celebrity at work because I thanked him for being my favorite research tool in a dedication. I do it in my own name and I am damn proud of it. I still get the comments though about writing porn, and some people do ask the hubby if he is embarrassed. His reply is that he reaps the benefits.

    But, you are right. The implication is that we should not enjoy sex and those of us who do should be ashamed for the harlots that we are. If we read about sex, learn about satisfaction, uptight holier-than-thou types will have to figure out how to satisfy a woman. And that could lead to anarchy.

  13. Jami Alden said on 05.05.06 at 05:05 AM • [comment link]

    All I can say is that erotic romance better not jump the shark until after my book is released.  and i’m sorry, but i’m so sick of this line:  “these aren’t your grandmother’s romance novels.”  when i was 13, i started raiding my grandmother’s romance collection.  Know what author I discovered? Bertrice Small,who wrote about gang bangs and double penetrations.  oh, and Susan Johnson who wrote about glass dildos and women with come streaming down their legs.  So seriously, when my book comes out (huh huh, i said come) my grandmother won’t bat an eye.

  14. fiveandfour said on 05.05.06 at 06:51 AM • [comment link]

    I just love the bit about the husband who so carefully pointed out “unacceptable passages”, but his book was “very dog-eared”.  Hmmmm…wonder who got it so worn out? 

    And as for me, I’m kinda’ glad this came out since it gave me a few new authors to look out for.  That is why the media does these little stories, isn’t it? 

    /sarcasm

  15. Doug Hoffman said on 05.05.06 at 06:59 AM • [comment link]

    Something weird happened with my eyes, so that at first I read, “Last I checked, there was a physical end point to the vaginal candy.”

    And I thought, They’re making vaginal candy now? Like I need any more incentive?

  16. Jeri said on 05.05.06 at 02:01 PM • [comment link]

    What’s that deafening noise?  Is it the ka-ching of bookstore cash registers across the Chicago metro area?

    The line about the husband’s dog-eared copy was very sly.

    What really cracked me up was the scary-ass logo they made up (see the right-hand column of the article, under the pull quote). 

    SEX SELLERS: How you can protect your wife from dirty thoughts and high expectations…tonight at ten.

  17. lovelysalome said on 05.05.06 at 04:24 PM • [comment link]

    oh, and Susan Johnson who wrote about glass dildos and women with come streaming down their legs.

    Johnson… um… enlightened me in high school.  The Outlaw is a nasty little piece of naughty.  Fantastic reading!  Forget about plot - go straight for the sex on page 60-ish.  Why wait?

  18. Vivi Anna said on 05.05.06 at 04:39 PM • [comment link]

    I love the coverage.  Although it’s been around for a long while, erotic is just starting to hit mainstream.  One of the Angela Knight’s books finally hit the NY Times Bestselling List, I think that may be the first erotic/romance that has.  It’s okay now for the bookstores to prominently display it, and talk about it, and promote it…before it was in the back in the erotica section…

    I just wish this attitude would come north to Canada….we’re much too prudish up here and need to shake things up a bit…

    And I love how my book SEXY BEAST got so much play.  I haven’t gotten that much play in longer than I care to admit…

  19. Kaite said on 05.05.06 at 06:36 PM • [comment link]

    Erotica can’t[\i] jump the shark. It’s been around and selling like hotcakes since before moveable type (three things have and will always sell: sex, politics and religion. Sometimes all three at once) even though at the time it was written by men. All that’s happened since the first naughty book got put through the press is that they’ve taken out the woodcuts.

    Perhaps this reporter should research farther back than 1850. Or are his knickers in a twist because erotica was originally written for men, and now women are buying and reading the books?

    :roll:

  20. azteclady said on 05.05.06 at 06:47 PM • [comment link]

    Methinks that it’s a perfectly safe bet that the angry husband with the dogeared copy has never heard of Fanny Hill.

    http://eserver.org/fiction/fanny-hill/default.html


    But then, it has been pointed out that part of the outrage factor here is that these books are written mainly by women and for *gasp* a mainly female audience.

    Anarchy at the very least, indeed.

  21. J-me said on 05.05.06 at 07:00 PM • [comment link]

    Sex may sell, but never to women.  (And I soooooo do not count Fabio hocking margerine!)  If sex was used to sell to women than the kitchen appliance ads in the local paper would have a VGL guy obviously just outta bed in the morning, standing at the kitchen counter in his boxers (or a robe with nice pecks peeking thru) eating a washing his cereal bowl.  Talk about a fantasy.

  22. Darlene Marshall said on 05.05.06 at 07:41 PM • [comment link]

    I don’t know, J-me.  Remember Lucky Vanous as the hunky construction workers in those Diet Coke ads?  He sold me.[g]

    And who could ever forget The Cleaning Hunk:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPVeBGodlI8&search=The Cleaning Hunk

  23. Vivi Anna said on 05.05.06 at 08:38 PM • [comment link]

    OMG Darlene!  I love that!!!!

  24. Darlene Marshall said on 05.05.06 at 08:45 PM • [comment link]

    Isn’t it just the best?  And notice, if you will, that the fortunate housewife is using her freed up time to read a book as well as check out the Cleaning Hunk’s package.

    That’s what I’m talking about!

  25. Kaite said on 05.05.06 at 09:27 PM • [comment link]

    “Sex may sell, but never to women.”

    I don’t know about that. The novels of Anne Radcliffe sold well, and sold mostly to women. In fact, if I recall my literary history, her novels were considered highly inflammatory to female sensibilities, although the books were not considered suitable reading for anyone but women.

    And have you ever read some of those early Gothics? Yeesh. Jaid Black could take some lessons. Not in terms of lurid description, but events and situations. I’m sure the women weren’t buying them like candy because they felt they were ‘spiritually edifying morality tales,’ LOL! I think the rape fantasy originated in some of those stories (although I think the one I’m thinking of was written by a man.)

    Sex has always sold to everyone, the question is the degree of sex you have to put on the label to sell it.

  26. Sybil said on 05.07.06 at 12:59 AM • [comment link]

    Is this online anywhere yet?  I wanna see the whole thing, or read it.  I so want Sexy Beast, if for the cover alone and I am so not a cover whore.

    Did it really say:
    SEX SELLERS: How you can protect your wife from dirty thoughts and high expectations…tonight at ten.
    ????

    And anything can jump the shark… just saying it CAN’T almost means we can mark a day it will.  On one hand it sucks, romantica, erotica, erotic romance have been around forever.  And ebooks have been selling like hotcakes for years now but all the press (which is good in a way bad in others) makes it looks like OMFG it is nothing but porn (not that there is anything wrong with porn)!  LOOK at all the SEX.

    And it isn’t just about sex, it is also about the plot and the characters.  Because take away the plot, the characters and make it bad funky sex, and well you have porn.  And there are few things worse than bad porn.

    But at the end of the day, who the fuck cares what ‘those’ people think.  As long as the readers and writers respect ourselves we don’t have to worry about the rest of the world.

    I mean it isn’t like we have writers who look down on others who are working just as har…. oh.  Shit.  Well.

    Maybe we need to focus on fixing that part of it and tell the rest of the world to fuck off ;).

    sybil
    I so knew I should have trademarked le sigh!

  27. Jeri said on 05.07.06 at 01:53 AM • [comment link]

    Did it really say:
    SEX SELLERS: How you can protect your wife from dirty thoughts and high expectations…tonight at ten.???

    No, I made the second part up.  But it does have SEX SELLERS in a creepy font with a lurid background, like those logos CNN/Fox/MSNBC comes up with for, you know, MAD COW DISEASE or KATRINA AFTERMATH or OPERATION SAVE W’s POLL NUMBERS or whatever.  They probably even created scary theme music to go with it.

    Why do I have Don Henley’s “Dirty Laundry” stuck in my head now?

  28. LushlyMe said on 05.07.06 at 05:00 PM • [comment link]

    Haha!  The problem is that CBS2 is a joke of a news organization… As much as I love romance and erotica, I skipped the report because it could not help but be bad or at very least banal. 

    Oh and ladies.. it is news at 10 in Chicago…

  29. Heather said on 05.07.06 at 09:12 PM • [comment link]

    LOL.  I loved the “dog-eared copy” part.

    You know if they were just looking at stuff like Playboy or Hustler this would be a non-issue.  Refer to a woman as a sexual being, though?

    “The sky is falling the sky is falling run for your lives the sky is falling!”

  30. Laura V said on 05.08.06 at 10:07 PM • [comment link]

    “Sex may sell, but never to women. [...] If sex was used to sell to women than the kitchen appliance ads in the local paper would have a VGL guy obviously just outta bed in the morning, standing at the kitchen counter in his boxers (or a robe with nice pecks peeking thru) eating a washing his cereal bowl.”

    I don’t know about that. Was the Diet Coke ad, the one with the construction worker who’s naked to the waist and drinking the Diet Coke, while the song ‘I just want to make love to you’ played in the background, just aimed at men, then? And what about the Levis advert with the guy at the launderette?

  31. DeRex said on 05.13.06 at 10:54 PM • [comment link]

    Hey nice.. I have been working on a story. part funny, part erotic. If you get a chance cum by and take a look.
    Duke Lacrosse Private Eye

  32. Add a Comment

    Sorry, comments are now closed for this post.

  • Looking for a book?
    View our past advertisements!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...