Bitchin' Blog Posts
Lord Scandal and Lord Sin by Kalen Hughes
by SB Sarah | May 30, 2008 | Friday at 6:00 pm | 223 CommentsTitle: Lord Sin & Lord Scandal
Author: Kalen Hughes
Publication Info: Kensington 2008
ISBN: 0821781502
Genre: Historical: European
A two-book review from the “And Now For Something A Little Different” department.
You know those women who are friends with scads of men but not so many women? What if one of those women was in a historical romance? What if she were a widow, free of those pesky expectations of innocence and demureness? What if she were bawdy, outrageous, and friends with absolute piles of handsome, rakish men who adored her and considered her one of their own? Who would reign her in? Other women, gossip, scandal, and the expectations of society at the time? What if she didn’t give a rat’s ass about gossip, scandal, or the expectations of society? Who needs other women, anyway?
So, couple all that setup with a depth of historical knowledge that will literally make your corset spin around on top of your head, some sharp dialogue, and settings that are original, fascinating, and located in the same historical period with which you may be familiar, but at often unexplored locations within that period, and you have Hughes’ two books.
That trifecta of historical research, clever setting, and wholly memorable characters, held competently by Hughes’ writing, is some powerful juju.
The first, Lord Sin, is the story of George, aka Georgianna Exley, who is what tomboys grow up to be when they’re wealthy, whip smart, sexy, and aware of their female allure, but also wicked good at things like pool, shooting, horseracing, and generally making a gleeful sport of life. Ivo Dauntry left England in disgrace six years prior for fighting a duel over George. He’s returned to find that she’s a widow, she’s surrounded by men at all hours of the day, her home is an unofficial gentleman’s club, and despite his best intentions he has absolutely no power to resist her. He’s wildly jealous of all the other men, and is completely unimpressed with George’s mandate that, should she take a man to her bed, he gets one night and one night only. Ivo wants six nights, one for each year he was in exile.
So let me warn you: this is not your average historical romance novel. For one thing: the person struggling with moral and personal virtue vs. fiery burn-your-hairs-off sexual attraction? That’d be the hero. The one who has more potential partners than a stick could be shaken at? That’d be the heroine. If you’re up for having your expectations of the heroine’s virginity and relative innocent inexperience stood on their heads, and you’re up for meeting a heroine who will stick with you awhile, head directly to this book and jump in. Ivo is cranky, George at times treats him in ways that made me cringe, but I still rooted for them. The two of them knock heads before they knock boots in ways that toss a grenade on the idea of “conflict” and kick that conflict up in its own teeth. George and Ivo do not have it easy, but when they earn it, they earn it hot and good.
Which is why I was pleased and yet somewhat bummed out to find her in the next book in Hughes’ series featured George and Ivo, but most specifically George. She’s fascinating. She’s marvelous. She’s larger than life.
She damn near chews the scenery to the point where if you put the book down you might pick it up to find little bites taken out of the pages, and no cat in sight to blame for the nibble.
Lord Scandal follows Gabriel, a mere mister of some fortune and even more some reputation, and Imogen, the “Portrait Divorcee.” Divorced on grounds of her alleged infidelity after she sat for a rather scandalous portrait (Think Madame X only more alluring, I think) and the resulting gossip humiliated her politically-ambitious husband, Imogen is an outcast in a society she once managed marvelously as a political hostess. George takes Imogen under her wing, and quietly goes about restoring Imogen to society, albeit a more racy, outrageous, and frankly fun, if you’re asking me, section of society.
One element that Hughes exploits to great advantage is the idea of cliques within the ton, as George and her cronies are of “the sporting set,” which defines them apart from other groups, though they all might end up at the same ball or gathering together. Plus, Hughes’ understanding of what sorts of activities those sporting folks might get on with makes for some witty dialogue and refreshingly different scenes. Almack’s my ass: we have horseracing, hunting parties, country parties with fox hunting and shooting - places men would only be welcome except for the iconoclast George and her companion Imogen. And before the book gets top heavy with the manly manhood, there are scenes with the women spending an afternoon reading fashion catalogs, for example, and discussing dresses and styles, which revealed what some women of status and fortune actually did with themselves during the day.
And therein lie my problems with this book: George is all about installing Imogen among her set of manly man friends, and as a divorcee, Imogen’s social options are rather limited. What better group to ignore her alleged dalliance than a crew of dudes? Dudes, obviously, won’t give a flying crap cake. Gabriel, a fixture in the rakish sporting posse, is barely allowed entrance to most social events, and the more outrageous he is, the better he was to read about, and the more fun he is to see within his social circle. But the actual conduct that made Imogen a pariah is never fully explained, nor is the impact of Gabriel’s intimate knowledge of that portrait revealed. I had to wonder what would happen when Imogen learned the extent of Gabriel’s knowledge of her - and since it wasn’t revealed in front my readerly eyes, I’m not sure I can believe it was for the best.
Imogen’s coming back from a place of deep humiliation, so of course she fears the consequences of a shocking and gossipy fling with Gabriel - and she has real reason to fear those consequences, as Hughes makes a point of underscoring just how vulnerable Imogen really is, despite Ivo and George’s protection as her friends. George, rakish social pirate that she is, comes to Imogen’s defense again and again with her own considerable power in society, but essentially, Imogen is very, very vulnerable. And thus, Imogen herself pales, unfortunately, in comparison to George. George is full-strength oils applied with a trowel. Imogen is watercolors. Lots of them, skillfully done, breathtakingly moving, but water colors. George is a canvas you can smell drying from across the street.
Even despite the more frustrating aspects of the writing - scenes that are absurdly short, for example, and ended way too soon for my tastes, and a secondary character, as I’ve noted, who is so larger than life she can easily overshadows the sequel protagonists - the strength and clever originality of the setting, coupled with a whole posse of memorable characters and a deeper knowledge of the time period than I’ve grown accustomed to from most historical romance authors, combined to create a very diverting read. Even if at times I was looking for George or Gabriel more than I was looking for Imogen, I came to appreciate and enjoy the whole set of characters that I was happy to spend more time in Hughes’ Georgian world.
But soft! What awesome from yonder website breaks? It is the giveaways, and I have five! To be specific: I have five sets of both books, Lord Sin and Lord Scandal, if you are interested in taking a gallop around Georgian England.
You want to enter? Leave a comment. Say anything, but say it in the next 24 hours. I’ll select five random winners from the total number of comments, and announce them once time is up.
Filed: Reviews, Grade B, Authors, H-K
Tagged: kalen hughes, history, historical romance

kelly said on 05.30.08 at 06:07 PM • [comment link]
i can has georgian kick ass womminz plz??
KCfla said on 05.30.08 at 06:15 PM • [comment link]
I love bawdy, crazy ladies- in any era.
Sign me up for the give-away please!!!
nekobawt said on 05.30.08 at 06:22 PM • [comment link]
seeing as i was going to look into acquiring those books based off the review, it only makes sense to try and take advantage of an opportunity for free stuff. huzzah!
Kate said on 05.30.08 at 06:23 PM • [comment link]
I’m in! These sound like great reads - sort of the fast, fictionalized Georgiana of Devonshire.
Kirsten Saell said on 05.30.08 at 06:24 PM • [comment link]
Heh. I am those women. Now if only I had two coins to rub together, some political clout and a really big gun…
Randi said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM • [comment link]
Would Georgina be considered an anti-heroine, that DA was pondering not too long ago? hmmm…I’d like me some anti-heroine. plsktks.
amy lane said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM • [comment link]
me me me me me!!! I haven’t read a good Regency in AGES…and I’m a sucker for a well-drawn character. (I’m also a throwback to the ‘virgins are fun’ school of Regency, so if nothing else, this could convert me:-)
Cassie said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM • [comment link]
How refreshing, to have a little switcheroo of the hero and heroine’s positions. I’m a bit tired of the demure heroine and the rakish hero. Bring on the scandalous widows!
Cat Marsters said on 05.30.08 at 06:27 PM • [comment link]
Ooh these sound fabulous. I’m on a bit of a historical kick at the moment as it is (and finding I don’t have nearly as many of them as I thought!). If winning don’t work, Amazon will have to…
And Kirsten, I’m one of those women too. Girls don’t like me. Who cares? Men buy me drinks.
TraeCat said on 05.30.08 at 06:28 PM • [comment link]
Me me me me me too!!! I’m always game for a new book that someone tells me kicks righteous ass..
the tiresome wilting regency heroine is outdated. Sounds like George says she’ll do it her way or get the hell out of her way..
Mary said on 05.30.08 at 06:35 PM • [comment link]
Oooh, I love a good hunting party scenario. Although I always end up thinking of this: Monty Python Hunting Sketch
tracyleann said on 05.30.08 at 06:35 PM • [comment link]
I started Lord Sin a while ago and never finished it because there were so many other books out there I wanted to read. I was liking it, but (as of however far I made it) wasn’t blown away. But now you’ve inspired me to dig it up again to find out what I am missing. Darn you…
Jage said on 05.30.08 at 06:36 PM • [comment link]
Oooh, I’m in, this sounds interesting and I’m just getting back into reading regency.
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 06:44 PM • [comment link]
*Squee* I can haz review!
I’m one of “those women” too. My nickname at the local coffee shop is “the chick who’s a dude” due to my showing up most Saturdays in motorcycle leathers and hanging out with all the biker boys.
Kate: I totally had the Duchess of Devonshire in the back of my head (mix with a bit of Sophy from The Grand Sophy, Lady Babs from An Infamous Army, and Serena from Bath Tangle and SHAKE). Those are among my favorite heroines of all time.
Randi: I do think George is a bit of an anti-heroine (as discussed on DA), but I wasn’t about to pop off and mention my own book there. That always seems a bit too . . . too . . . you know what I mean.
BTW, if anyone wants a freebie, I’m giving away a short story on my website:
Something Wicked: A Rakes of London Short
SCANDAL IS IMPOSSIBLE TO AVOID . . .
Eleanor Blakely is only too aware that her reputation dangles by a very slender thread. One false step, one mistake, and the entire world will know the secret her family has struggled to keep hidden. Unfortunately, she’s found herself in the midst of a desperate series of wagers with a consummate charmer . . .
AND EVEN HARDER TO RESIST . . .
Viscount Wroxton isn’t exactly sure what twist of fate has kept his friend Blakely’s sister on the shelf, but the inveterate little gamester is too fascinating to ignore. The fact that she has five enormous—and protective—brothers is hardly worth thinking about . . .
Erin said on 05.30.08 at 06:44 PM • [comment link]
Oh, man, I’ve been wanting to read these books for what seems like forever - and my library is being pesky-slow about getting them for me!
katiebabs said on 05.30.08 at 06:46 PM • [comment link]
So, the heroine is a “duchess of slut?” Oh wee about time I says!!
Becky said on 05.30.08 at 06:48 PM • [comment link]
Pick me, pick me! I’m always looking for something new and different.
Kelly said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM • [comment link]
Hi! Except as I generally explain, I’m the Janeane Garofalo of the group - one of the guys, never thought of as anything other than. Gets damned frustrating - perhaps I need a Georges to show me my mistakes. *snort*
(And I’m game for a random drawing, since the first romance I read…er..last week.. was a regency era, and I genuinely enjoyed it. And besides, it’d be a nice offset to all the Deep and Serious academic books I should really be reading, instead of flitting about the internet…)
Jean C. said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM • [comment link]
Sounds like a fabulous character. I’ll be on the lookout for these, even if I’m not lucky enough to get one of the sets.
plaatsch said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM • [comment link]
WANT!
Ashwinder said on 05.30.08 at 06:56 PM • [comment link]
Oh hell, I’ll read these!
Annmarie said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM • [comment link]
These sound delish, how’d I miss them?
Jesbelle said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM • [comment link]
Yay for unconventional histories! Definitely going to check them out whether I win or not.
Anya said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM • [comment link]
I am definitely in!
Julia said on 05.30.08 at 07:02 PM • [comment link]
Sound like a couple of great reads there! Count me in.
Lori said on 05.30.08 at 07:04 PM • [comment link]
As an impoverished grad student I’m a big fan of free books and these sound like a great way to spend some of my summer break.
Rhian said on 05.30.08 at 07:05 PM • [comment link]
Count me in - George sounds wonderfully refreshing, and after Heyer’s Bath Tangle I’m a sucker for any hero named Ivo. (Even if I don’t win, I’ll be adding these books to my to-read list. We need more strong heroines in historical novels.)
Anj said on 05.30.08 at 07:06 PM • [comment link]
And you’ve won me over! Pick me! I wanna read about about larger than life historical women! me!
Esther said on 05.30.08 at 07:06 PM • [comment link]
Cannot. Pass. Up. Free. Books.
Count me in!
Avi said on 05.30.08 at 07:07 PM • [comment link]
These sound really interesting. It sounded like the first book warranted higher than a B- though.
George sounds a lot like The Grand Sophy, except Sophy behaved when she had to. I am up for anything that brings me back to an old Georgette Heyer.
C. Diane said on 05.30.08 at 07:08 PM • [comment link]
Oh, I adore stereotypes turned upside-down!
Muse of Ire said on 05.30.08 at 07:08 PM • [comment link]
Ooh, me want!
CT said on 05.30.08 at 07:15 PM • [comment link]
Yeah, if I don’t win (and I won’t because I don’t), these will be the next books I buy.
GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:15 PM • [comment link]
Heyer came immediately to mind when I saw the hero’s name, Ivo. Nice homage, Kalen!
Please toss my name in the hat for the drawing.
Btw, did you all know that there’s gonna be a movie with Keira Knightley about Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, out this fall? It’s called ‘The Duchess’.
I just re-read my copy of The Unexpected Passion, a ‘faction’ about Georgiana’s daughter who married Georgiana’s sister’s lover of 15 years and their story does really restore faith in humanity, because he became a faithful husband and they really lived happily ever after for 36 years until his death at 72. I’m reading her letters right now and they are fascinating.
Phyl said on 05.30.08 at 07:16 PM • [comment link]
Me too! I wants!
Sarabeth said on 05.30.08 at 07:23 PM • [comment link]
There is something to be said about the juxtaposition of oil and watercolor. I really like that comparison.
Tamar Bihari said on 05.30.08 at 07:31 PM • [comment link]
I love your reviews. When you don’t like a book, you pinpoint why with clarity and humor (and I agree nearly all the time, which never happens), and when you do, it makes me want to run out and buy the book (or books, in this case). So, um, yeah. Include me in the drawing, please. Otherwise it definitely goes on my shopping list. I’ll even break out of my self-imposed mysteries-only run for these two. It seems so rare these days to combine historical accuracy with a three dimensional, strong heroine.
Randi said on 05.30.08 at 07:33 PM • [comment link]
OK…I have an admission. I bought my first Georgette Heyer book not too long ago, as she is bandied about here and at DA all the time, with raving reviews. Except…I couldn’t even get 3 chapters into it. The writing was really stylized and dated (in that it really felt like a 19th centrury novel-which I find really hard to read) and I found that extremely off-putting. Did I just get the wrong book? Please tell me, what is the attraction to Heyer?
Cat Grant said on 05.30.08 at 07:36 PM • [comment link]
I’m intrigued! Sign me up for the drawing.
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 07:37 PM • [comment link]
Rhian: I couldn’t not use “Ivo”. Even though I caught some flack from non-Heyerites who thought the name wasn’t sexy. *sigh* Two of them pinned me down at a conferene and told me they’d almost skipped buying the book because the hero didn’t have a “manly” name like Jack or Jake. I kid you not: Jack and Jake. The kicker? My three crit partners at the time had heroes named Jack, Jack, and Jake. LOL!
GrowlyCub: The DD movie only covers the early (and rather boring) part of Georgiana’s life. I think it stops when she’s like 26! They’re not going to dig into any of the meaty stuff (her affair with Lord Grey, her gambling, her cancer, etc.). If you can find the illustrated version of Amanda Foreman’s biography GRAB IT. I loved the plain novel version, but all the extra paintings and cartoons etc. in the illustrated one are to die for.
Sue said on 05.30.08 at 07:38 PM • [comment link]
Ooooh, this looks interesting. I’ve never seen “Ivo” as a hero’s name, either. (Yes, I am commenting to try to get the books. No, I have no shame.)
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 07:40 PM • [comment link]
Randi, which book did you buy? Some start off easier than others. Heyer’s voice is a bit slower than a modern romance. It WILL feel more like you’re reading Austen or Bronte than me or Candice Hern or Julia Ross.
If you can find it, try starting with DEVIL’S CUB. I defy anyone to not love that book (make yourself keep reading until Vidal kidnaps Mary, I promise you’ll be HOOKED!!!).
sarac said on 05.30.08 at 07:42 PM • [comment link]
Haven’t heard of these books before, but I am thoroughly intrigued.
azteclady said on 05.30.08 at 07:43 PM • [comment link]
Your comments software is hating on me!!!!/wail
Me, want. I have Lord Sin already but seriously, who can have too many copies? Not I, ‘cause then I can spread the love and
infect
... erm,
push the crack
erm… give Lord Sin to my romance reading neighbor :grin:
*muttering* I hope this works
Rosalinda said on 05.30.08 at 07:44 PM • [comment link]
Sign me up!
GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:44 PM • [comment link]
Hey, how can something that’s clearly a contraction of Ivanhoe not be sexy… some people have no imagination! :)
Kalen, I’ve thought about getting the biography, but the reason I like her daughter Haryo’s story so much is because of its HEA. Georgiana’s life, while definitely interesting, is just too sad (or should that read ‘real’?) for me.
Kathleen said on 05.30.08 at 07:46 PM • [comment link]
Okay, now I’m totally picturing George from all the Nancy Drew books. Only now she’s seduced Ned and Carson, ditched Bess and Nancy, and gotten a makeover with nails that could cut a bitch. Awesome.
GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM • [comment link]
Well, if we are recommending Heyers, here are my top5:
These Old Shades
Venetia
A Convenient Marriage
Devil’s Cub
A Civil Contract
I’m also curious which one Randi bought!
MaryKate said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM • [comment link]
Oooh! Sounds awesome. I’m in!
Tracy Shields said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM • [comment link]
Romances that turn convention on its head have saved the genre for me. Just when I think the HEA gets a bit dull, I run into a book that makes it all worthwhile again. I’m adding these titles to my “get and read” list.
December Quinn/Stacia Kane said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM • [comment link]
I always love Kalen’s comments here, so I definitely can’t wait to get my hands on these.
Annmarie said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM • [comment link]
Never mind. I can’t wait to see if I won. I am all about immediate gratification. I am ordering on Amazon now.
Leslie Dicken said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM • [comment link]
Wow, well, I can’t wait to read them. I’ve tried to write historical heroines who were not the norm and was usually slammed in contests or by editors as not being accurate. Sigh. Maybe I just don’t have the writing chops like Hughes! ;-)
Chanel19 said on 05.30.08 at 07:53 PM • [comment link]
I read “Lord Sin” the other month and really liked it. The idea of one man/one night works for me.
Gemma said on 05.30.08 at 07:53 PM • [comment link]
Count me in for the draw!
I hope it doesn’t matter what country you live in?
Chanel19 said on 05.30.08 at 07:54 PM • [comment link]
Read “Lord Sin” the other month. Enjoyed every page.
fshk said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM • [comment link]
These sound like fun reads!
KittyFinn said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM • [comment link]
It has been ages since I’ve been to the library or bought a new book. As a brand new mom of a month, I think these books would be a fantastic reason to head over to the library and see if they have them. Been a long time since a Historical caught my attention. Thanks!
venus said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM • [comment link]
I really like your review of these books, thanks!!!!
Carmen said on 05.30.08 at 07:57 PM • [comment link]
Put my name in please!
(First post, but I did just spend 2 months reading ALL of the archives. I’m actually disappointed that I’m caught up!)
shadowedge said on 05.30.08 at 07:59 PM • [comment link]
There once was a widow named George
who surrounded herself with hot boys
this sporting set scandal
had Ivo flying off his handle:
he wanted his one night, then five more.
Pretty please?
Shadowedge
AgTigress said on 05.30.08 at 07:59 PM • [comment link]
The review says ‘Georgian’, but everyone is now speaking of ‘Regency’. Which? When are the stories set? It makes quite a difference.
;)
MaggieDR said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM • [comment link]
Free books? I’m in!
kpsr. said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM • [comment link]
uh, that makes two of us. in high school i was known to my friends’ mothers as ‘it’snotagirlit’skari’. in fact, i think one of them used that as my name for a while.
also, i just wrote both of these books down in my planner with the books that i look for ever time i go to a bookstore. thus far, no luck at the local place, but now maybe i can win them. w00t! (i’ll keep looking at the store, though, just in case.)
Scotsie said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM • [comment link]
Sign me up for the giveaway please!
I LOVE it when authors play with conventions. Just finished “Kushiel’s Dart” and yes, the author had more leeway b/c it’s fantasy, but I still loved the switching of the Virgin/Experienced Lover roles.
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:05 PM • [comment link]
Leslie: I got slammed a lot too. Believe me. The LORD SIN manuscript got 2s and 3s in the Golden Heart (and one 8). People either love it or hate it. I get very few “meh” responses, and that’s FINE with me! But it also got great comments in a few (my favorite—from an unnamed published author—was “Georgette Heyer meets Stephanie Laurensâ€).
I think it’s about finding the “right†judges and crit partners and looking closely at the reasons why the heroine is getting slammed. Sometimes the out-of-the-box heroine can come across a bit like Hermie the Elf (“I just want to be a dentist!â€). The motivation is missing (or at least it’s missing from the page). Are the judges not buying WHY she’s the way she is? Or are they just disliking her on a more visceral level (the “I don’t like bitches/sluts†reaction)? These are very different problems and have to be approached in very different ways.
I think there’s more and more room for unconventional heroines in the genre. Recently writers like Victoria Dahl, Candice Hern and Julia Ross have had some great anti-heroines.
Willa said on 05.30.08 at 08:11 PM • [comment link]
Oooh, free books! The premise of Lord Scandal sounds very intriguing.
shewhohashope said on 05.30.08 at 08:13 PM • [comment link]
Free books, you say? Count me in.
Randi, which book didn’t you like? I’ve recently been unable to finish Venetia, and I love the others of ehrs I’ve read.
I’d rec: Cotillion, The Convenient Marriage, and The Grand Sophy (warning for some quite horrifying anti-semitism, just skip the scene where Sophy goes to the moneylender entirely) because they’re the funniest ones I’ve read so far.
Devil’s Cub and These Old Shades are more romantic, but you may want to read The Black Moth for background (I don’t think anyone likes that one).
Eva Lynn said on 05.30.08 at 08:16 PM • [comment link]
Good lord there are a lot of comments already!
...well, here’s another. ;)
(My spam word is ‘tell39’—I suppose I could, but that would surely just make my odds worse!)
Kristin said on 05.30.08 at 08:17 PM • [comment link]
Ooh, sounds fascinating. Sign me up!
Amy Teel said on 05.30.08 at 08:18 PM • [comment link]
DO WANT
Spider (@ work) said on 05.30.08 at 08:18 PM • [comment link]
I’m throwing my hat in the ring! A big, fabulous, English wedding hat sort of hat (for which I actually do have to shop this weekend). Here’s hoping I’ll have some books to go with it!
Ocy said on 05.30.08 at 08:20 PM • [comment link]
Wow, sounds like my kind of historical(s).
And it was good for me.
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:23 PM • [comment link]
They’re Georgian. Set in 1788-1789. But the world is not that far removed from the extended Regency period. It’s not going to feel alien to someone who reads “Regencies”, though the cast of movers and shakers is going to be different which might be confusing to those who are looking for Beau Brummell and Lady Jersey and Byron. I’m working on a “Who’s Who†page for my website. I’m hoping to have it up this weekend. *fingers crossed*
Partly the confusion comes from how someone dates “The Regencyâ€. Purists limit it to the ACTUAL dates of the Regency (1811-1820). Most readers, writers and publishers fudge the dates out to the first few decades of the 19th century (1800-1830), covering most of the period in which Empire-style gowns were worn, the conflict with Napoleon was taking place, and the Prince of Wales was either prominent, acting as regent, or king. Historically, an argument can be made to stretch back to 1788 (when George III has his first bout of madness and the first Regency crisis takes place).
Sarah said on 05.30.08 at 08:25 PM • [comment link]
Reading the review made me want to pick these up—maybe I’ll get lucky and save myself the $$$!
Love the site!
Lizzie (greeneyed fem) said on 05.30.08 at 08:28 PM • [comment link]
ooooo—I’m in! I wanna read about a nonvirginal Georgian heroine! Definitely will look these up if I don’t win them. *fingers crossed*
(HA! and my keyword is ‘want33’! Yes. Yes I do want.)
Mary M said on 05.30.08 at 08:29 PM • [comment link]
I like the idea of these stories, especially the concept of the girl more at ease with men than with other women applied to a historical. I don’t think I’ve seen it before. And I love those girls who have loads of male friends, probably because I’d like to be like that too :-p. Count me in!
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:29 PM • [comment link]
I love THE BLACK MOTH, but I don’t think you have to read it before you read THESE OLD SHADES (though you’ll love Avon even more if you do!). What kills me (turns me flaming green with envy!) is that Heyer was 16 when she wrote THE BLACK MOTH. 16!!!
I think the only Heyer books I don’t like enough to reread them are A CIVIL CONTRACT and BEAUVALLET. My all time fav is VENETIA.
D-Day said on 05.30.08 at 08:39 PM • [comment link]
Desperate to read these books!
Leah said on 05.30.08 at 08:39 PM • [comment link]
Oooh, me! me! Pick me!
Ruth said on 05.30.08 at 08:40 PM • [comment link]
So, as I quietly admit, I’ve never read a Kalen Hughes book. Where should I start?
spamword: lay96. Ok, seriously, why does the spam blocker keep reminding me of my college boyfriend? The one I didn’t marry? Cause this is like the fourth time.
BethanyA said on 05.30.08 at 08:45 PM • [comment link]
What a cool line: “George is a canvas you can smell drying from across the street.”
I just finished my first Heyer last week (The Grand Sophy). I don’t know what took me so long—I’m 24 and have been reading romance since my early teens. I have a very enjoyable summer ahead, I think, but would love these books to add to the pile.
Mel-O-Drama said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM • [comment link]
I loved Lord Sin and can’t wait to read Lord Scandal! Yay!
megalith said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM • [comment link]
Wow, these really sound good. Sign me up, even if I don’t win free copies!
Diane said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM • [comment link]
Wow, what a great review.
I don’t read historicals (except early Garwood and McNaught) and managed to resist the urge to pick up Bourne’s Spymaster’s Lady despite the glowing reviews here and at DA.
But, I have to say that I will be running to Border’s tonight to pick up Lord Sin and Lord Scandal to read tomorrow. So kudos to SB Sarah and Kalen for titillating my interest with both a wonderful review and a great storyline.
OK…just found out that none of my local Borders have Lord Sin in stock so I had to order it . And that Lord Scandal is a June release. Bummer…I was so looking forward to reading them tomorrow.
Deirdre said on 05.30.08 at 08:54 PM • [comment link]
I ordered both of these books on paperbackswap.com last week after reading some comments here. “Lord Sin” arrived yesterday; “Lord Scandal” is on its way. Woo-hoo!
I’m halfway through Book #2 of the “Outlander” series, so I think I will take a break from Jamie & Claire and move these books to the top of the TBR pile!
Ruut said on 05.30.08 at 08:55 PM • [comment link]
Gimme! I want! Pleeeeeeease! Pretty please?
*Grabbing control from the greedy inner child* Sounds great, I would love to read them.
Tracey S. Rosenberg said on 05.30.08 at 09:04 PM • [comment link]
Chance at free books? Count me in!
kukulcan girl said on 05.30.08 at 09:06 PM • [comment link]
These books sound so much fun! I love historicals.
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 09:06 PM • [comment link]
LORD SIN is getting hard to find. It was a May 07 release and right now I think ordering it (online or at your local bookstore) is the only way to get a copy. It’s the way of the world . . . you should hear my mom complain about it. LOL!
Ruth: These are my only two books (so far) so getting started is easy. If you meant you’d never read Heyer and don’t know where to start, I hear you. Try: DEVIL’S CUB, VENETIA, ARABELLA, or THE GRAND SOPHY. All of those are great introductions to Heyer.
Linnet said on 05.30.08 at 09:12 PM • [comment link]
I’m not usually one for historicals. However these definitely sound interesting so sign me up for the contest!
Alison said on 05.30.08 at 09:15 PM • [comment link]
Beauvallet was the first Heyer that I read (at ... 13 maybe) and I loved it. I must admit when I went back many years later and re-read it, it had lost some charm, but I still enjoy it. I think the only Heyer’s I couldn’t finish were the non-fictiony ones. I even enjoy her murder mysteries
Steph said on 05.30.08 at 09:20 PM • [comment link]
*saying anything*
:-D
Karen Junker said on 05.30.08 at 09:26 PM • [comment link]
Diane - you really should read Spymaster’s Lady!
I’d love to win free books, but I have no room to keep them, so I’d pass them on to the next person…after I read them!
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 09:27 PM • [comment link]
I just hated the heroine in BEAUVALLET. I spent the whole book being annoyed that the hero liked her and that I knew he was going to end up with her. *shrug* It happens.
Kathryn said on 05.30.08 at 09:29 PM • [comment link]
I can get them free at the library where I work…but it’s not the same as owning! Then I can have the spines cracked at my favorite scenes.
Favorite = most sexy
Word: seems48…seems as though more than 48 people are intrigued by these books!
AnimeJune said on 05.30.08 at 09:32 PM • [comment link]
Those books sound absolutely delightful - I do often get tired when it’s always the heroine who is virginal and the hero who is confidence and experienced. Have it the other way around! Some authors (Jane Feather) for example have tried having the sexually sporting heroine, but I was so completely bored by “Almost a Lady” that I couldn’t even finish it.
RStewie said on 05.30.08 at 09:38 PM • [comment link]
Ohh, I’d like one, please. From the list of comments above, though, I’m not holding out much hope, but I’m throwing my hat in anyway!
my spamword is giving me hope, too!! thirty43, indeed!
AgTigress said on 05.30.08 at 09:42 PM • [comment link]
Thank you so much, Kalen! A wonderful period. I am a lot more attracted to the society of the late 18th century than that of the early 19th, which is already showing the signs of the rather smothering atmosphere of the Victorian period, and I am sure you have evoked it with real panache and with that firm foundation of knowledge that will make it ring true. I am going to look out for these books, and really look forward to reading them!
GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 09:44 PM • [comment link]
Wow, I just read the excerpts at Amazon and if I don’t win, I’ll definitely order them from Bamm.com (Amazon is good for that, but not for buying any longer, he he). Btw, even if we can’t all win, the prices are really reasonable for books ($3.99 and $4.99), but they are also shorter than I’m used to (301 and 285 respectively).
Kalen, was that just the way the stories went or was that a publisher imposed limit?
Spam word: question82, well, if I think long enough I can probably come up with 82 questions… :)
Becs said on 05.30.08 at 09:50 PM • [comment link]
Wonderful review, the books sound great!
Jane O said on 05.30.08 at 09:50 PM • [comment link]
From the number of comments, I gather I’m not the only one who is eager to read these. I hope I’m lucky, but one way or another I’ll need to get my library to buy them too.
Sharon Buchbinder said on 05.30.08 at 09:52 PM • [comment link]
I don’t normally read this sub-genre—but your review is making me say, “Where’s my copy??”
Yes, you had that effect48. :)
Anki said on 05.30.08 at 09:52 PM • [comment link]
These books sound great, especially George. I love heroines that are secure in themselves, and not afraid of being who they are.
I’ve had a streak of bad luck with romance novels lately with a high “asshat to doormat” ratio, so I’ll definitely look for these two the next time I go book shopping.
Kylara said on 05.30.08 at 09:54 PM • [comment link]
Do indeed want, since the first book just sounds fascinating and the second sounds—well, if I like the first book, I’ll be glad to see the characters in the second book. !
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 09:54 PM • [comment link]
It’s about the way the publisher laid them out (type size and # of lines per page, aka “leading”). The manuscripts are actually standard length (and LORD SCANDAL is longer in manuscript form than LORD SIN, but shorter in book form; go figure).
Randi said on 05.30.08 at 09:55 PM • [comment link]
I forget the name, as it is at home and I am at work; but I think it’s a newer release…?It’s about two male twins, and one twin is MIA but is supposed to marry a lady, so the second twin steps in to pretend he’s the first twin. Does that make sense? hahahaha.
GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 10:00 PM • [comment link]
Randi, that’s False Colors. If your local library carries Heyer you might want to check out some and see if any of them appeal more. I hate it when I can’t hook romance readers on Heyer! :)
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 10:07 PM • [comment link]
Me too!
hollygee said on 05.30.08 at 10:15 PM • [comment link]
Wow, great review. I want to read them—and get them as a prize? Yes!
Eli said on 05.30.08 at 10:19 PM • [comment link]
Must have. Glad I’m not the only one reduced to LOL speak when confronted with a giveaway for books I must have. Must Have.
Samantha said on 05.30.08 at 10:20 PM • [comment link]
Help a poor bitch out please? Pretty please? Please please? I am completely surrounded by nothing to read.
Joy said on 05.30.08 at 10:23 PM • [comment link]
Count me in on the drawing and I LOVE Heyer. Still a classic in the romance field though definitely not modern. I don’t think people who haven’t read Heyer know any of the background of the “regency romance”. They don’t know about who invented some of the literary types that we take for granted in historical romances and some of the conventions of the field. Too sad! It would be like a mystery fan who had never read Sherlock Holmes!
Suze said on 05.30.08 at 10:23 PM • [comment link]
Anything! Anything for free books!
Rene said on 05.30.08 at 10:29 PM • [comment link]
You know, I don’t even read romance, but y’all are so entertaining I read your blog anyway. These books sound like they’d be a fun way to try out a genre I don’t usually read. Sign me up?
(Full disclosure: I read one romance, once.* This Raging Flower, by Lynn Erickson. IT SCARRED ME. It sounds like, from the stuff you review, that some of the tropes that grossed me out in that book have phased out of the genre. These books don’t sound like that at all, thank gawd.)
*I definitely enjoy stuff with romantic elements, but I’ve never shopped in the Romance section of the store.
Ann said on 05.30.08 at 10:39 PM • [comment link]
Me too please! (But with a name like George—I kept seeing Nancy Drew’s best friend as satirized in Confessions of a Teen Sleuth.
And why yes, I am over16. And in a week—more than double!
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 10:39 PM • [comment link]
Rene, welcome to the shiny pink side. *grin*
Melissandre said on 05.30.08 at 10:40 PM • [comment link]
There I was at Borders, taking full advantage of their “Buy 4 romances, get 1 free,” and I was thanking my lucky stars that I’d found the Smart Bitches; your excellent taste has kept me in good reading material all year. Then I get home, and find out there are more free books to be had. Even better! As a girl from the boy’s club, these sound right up my alley.
Estelle Chauvelin said on 05.30.08 at 10:43 PM • [comment link]
I only ever win contests where being bizarre or tasteless is a plus, not random drawings. I expect I’m going to have to buy these, but why not try?
Jennifer said on 05.30.08 at 10:45 PM • [comment link]
Oh mah gosh. Reading this review has me chomping at the big. ...Reading the comments has me snorting with laughter. You guys are great.
Please add me to the list! ...And, please, please pick me! ;)
Sherri D. said on 05.30.08 at 10:47 PM • [comment link]
Would love to win some books! I promise to pass Lord Sin on to someone else cause I’ve already read it—and loved it—and recommended it to my critique group. Also read Kalen’s on-line read. Very fun! All you lurkers go check it out. Keep writing Kalen!
Jennifer said on 05.30.08 at 10:47 PM • [comment link]
Wow - if that ain’t Freudian, I don’t know what is. I meant to type “bit.”
*sigh* A Freudian Slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Wirdald said on 05.30.08 at 10:49 PM • [comment link]
Hmm…hope for a freebie, or just go out and buy them? Decisions, decisions. Well, since I’m in the middle of a tornado watch right now, I guess I can wait and hope my number is picked. But I’m warning you! If I’m not picked, I’m going to go right out ... and buy ... them. Wait a minute…
I need to work on my threat skillz.
Eunice said on 05.30.08 at 10:58 PM • [comment link]
Random drawing contest?
“You know what Jack Burton always says… what the hell?”
alia said on 05.30.08 at 11:01 PM • [comment link]
free the books! books want to be free!
Ciara said on 05.30.08 at 11:04 PM • [comment link]
Well now I’m completely hooked. Nothing makes me buy a book faster than a good review by SBTB. :)
bzangl said on 05.30.08 at 11:06 PM • [comment link]
Please toss my name in the drawing. Great review, and the books sound awesome!!
Daphne B. said on 05.30.08 at 11:14 PM • [comment link]
Awesome review—very interested in reading the books.
I wish there was a site that reviewed only Georgian/Regency romances somewhere. I love Heyer (and that goes without saying) but don’t know who else might be equally satisfying.
sara said on 05.30.08 at 11:22 PM • [comment link]
I enjoy both chest hair and trampy heroines. Pick me!
Julie said on 05.30.08 at 11:26 PM • [comment link]
“anything”
They sound great! Pick me!
molly_rose said on 05.30.08 at 11:27 PM • [comment link]
Let us go then, George and I,
When pantaloons are tight ‘round our thigh
Like lover’s lips upon a neck;
Let us go, through romancelandia!
(I can haz books?)
Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 11:36 PM • [comment link]
Daphne B: RT and AAR both tell you what era a book is set in, so you can read just the ones for Georgian/Regency. If you’re looking for a few recomendatations, these are all on my MUST BUY list:
Julia Ross
Candice Hern
Pam Rosenthal
Tracy Grant (historical romantic suspense and KICK ASS!)
Jo Beverley (esp her Georgian ones!!!)
Loretta Chase
miaserene said on 05.30.08 at 11:38 PM • [comment link]
Yes I want to enter! Those characters sound awesome…
Emily said on 05.30.08 at 11:40 PM • [comment link]
Oh man, I’ve been wanting to read a romance with a heroine who’s not all fluff, and even if I don’t win, I think I may have to pick this one up. George sounds like my kinda girl.
Toni said on 05.30.08 at 11:40 PM • [comment link]
I love when an author takes romance tropes and turns them on their head in interesting ways.
Mary said on 05.30.08 at 11:45 PM • [comment link]
Sounds intriguing…
ChristineP said on 05.30.08 at 11:47 PM • [comment link]
I’m just getting back into reading romances, and these sound like great fun. Not that I ever win anything, but what the heck….
Spam word: look67. These books definitely are worth a look!
Joan B. said on 05.30.08 at 11:47 PM • [comment link]
These sound positively juicy. I’d love to win them.
Tricia Grissom said on 05.30.08 at 11:48 PM • [comment link]
Here’s hoping for a random win!
Shannon said on 05.30.08 at 11:51 PM • [comment link]
Sounds like a pair of very good reads. I have to wonder at Imogen’s reaction to George, if she’s been a good politicians wife for most of her life…really, I’d have to wonder at everyone’s reaction to George. She sounds like one insane individual.
tee said on 05.30.08 at 11:51 PM • [comment link]
Sound so good!
Rebecca said on 05.31.08 at 12:04 AM • [comment link]
Thanks for the in depth review. I thought I had given up on historicals of this time period but your review has intrigued me to give these books a shot!
Caitie said on 05.31.08 at 12:16 AM • [comment link]
I don’t read a lot of historicals, so I’m always way reluctant to try a new historical author. Even with that, I’ve been eying these 2 books at the bookstore the last couple weeks! These sound really good! I’m even more intrigued now =)
Suzanne said on 05.31.08 at 12:20 AM • [comment link]
I’d like to give them a try - sign me up, thanks!
Kate Hewitt said on 05.31.08 at 12:33 AM • [comment link]
These sound fun & interesting—sign me up for a chance!
willaful said on 05.31.08 at 12:38 AM • [comment link]
I have the first book and it has just dived up to the top of Mount TBR. Would love a chance to win the second one.
Susan/DC said on 05.31.08 at 12:39 AM • [comment link]
Am I shallow if I admit that one reason I want these books is because I just want to stare at the guys on the cover? With all the terrible covers out there, how wonderful that great stories got the covers they deserve—atmospheric and very nice to look at.
As for Georgette Heyer, one of my favorites is Black Sheep. I love the scene where Miles and Abby meet and she mistakes him for his nephew—a great “meet cute” scene. I also love The Talisman Ring. The book has two main couples, and IMHO the older outshines the younger one as far as wit and romance are concerned.
Kayigo said on 05.31.08 at 12:50 AM • [comment link]
oh, please, oh, please. Mistress, may I have another (book)?
happyreader said on 05.31.08 at 01:02 AM • [comment link]
Ohhh…... this sounds good. A woman with a spine who’s not ready to fall into vapors with the first good looking man. Please, please, let mw win
Marissa said on 05.31.08 at 01:08 AM • [comment link]
Yay- a new author for me to read!
Leslie said on 05.31.08 at 01:13 AM • [comment link]
Ooooooh, new genre-y goodness!
Put my name in the pot!
Susan W. said on 05.31.08 at 01:15 AM • [comment link]
I love the name Ivo, but I love Jack too. (And I’m not just saying this because I have one in my WIP! But I’ve also got an Arthur and a Hector, so I’m doing my part for names that sound unusual and maybe not so blatantly manly to modern ears.) My pet peeve is names that just don’t feel remotely period-appropriate, whether they’re truly anachronistic or just don’t match the character’s background—e.g. I just don’t think there were that many English aristocrats in the 18th or 19th century named Aidan or Brendan! I’m also a bit weary of heroes whose names or titles have over-the-top allusions to devils, wolves, darkness, etc. So, yay Ivo!
Vyc said on 05.31.08 at 01:34 AM • [comment link]
Dude, a non-virginal heroine who isn’t condemned by even the narrative itself? A hero who’s torn due to his own moral standards and who isn’t the one sleeping around? Please sign me up for this drawing, stat!
Freda said on 05.31.08 at 01:35 AM • [comment link]
Gimme, gimme!
my word is let79… yeah, let me have them!
Miss Monky said on 05.31.08 at 01:36 AM • [comment link]
I just want the books!
Midknyt said on 05.31.08 at 01:36 AM • [comment link]
One of my constant conflicts is my love of historical romances with my love a really strong female character who isn’t always a damsel in distress. I’ve come across some that are pretty good (and some that make me throw the book across the room because the girl is such an annoyingly weak waste of space), but this is a new stretch. Not sure how historically accurate it may be, but it sounds like it’ll be a fun read regardless.
(pick me, pick me!) :)
orangehands said on 05.31.08 at 01:40 AM • [comment link]
So glad I stopped by so I can enter into the drawing for awesome books!!! Woot!
Haven’t had a chance to read all 152 comments (waiting for a friend to pick me up) so you may have answered this, but why the B-? I mean, is it because of the second book, that has a secondary character that completely rocks (and so glad to hear she keeps her characters the same, which doesn’t always happen in sequels) and takes over, or what?
I mean, I still wnat the books, don’t get me wrong, just curious is all
SonomaLass said on 05.31.08 at 01:49 AM • [comment link]
I logged on (away on vacation) and went, “Whoa, damn, 156 comments? What did SB Sarah say in that review?” Then I read it—I see, she said “free books.” Explains it all.
Yay, Kalen Hughes—these books have been in my virtual TBR pile since I first heard of them; they sound like a breath of fresh air. It would be nice to win them, but if not I will get them some other way (nefarious plots…).
And I’m SO glad to see that I’m not the only one who thought of George from Nancy Drew!!!
Keri Ford said on 05.31.08 at 01:49 AM • [comment link]
GeeWhiz, I ordered both of these a few days ago and now I see you’re giving away FREEBIES! Mom always tells me not to jump on things so fast!
RE:Heyer
I read my first a month or so ago (Venetia) and I have to tell you, it took a lot to not put the book down. I had a friend I really trust recommended it, so I plowed through and boy I didn’t regret it! It gave me such a different view of this time period! Pick her up and give her try if you haven’t.
LizC said on 05.31.08 at 01:52 AM • [comment link]
These sound a bit like Your Scandalous Ways, which I’m reading now. In the sense that they turn standard historical romance novel conventions on their head. I’m all for that. Virginal and inexperienced woman vs. more experienced older man can get kind of old. I’m enjoying reading about a couple who are more on equal footing, at least as far as experience goes.
partystripes said on 05.31.08 at 01:53 AM • [comment link]
I’m shameless, so free books are as good a reason as any for a first comment for me. These sound great! And, dudes, I’ve got a 2 1/2 bus ride everyday, so the more reading I can bury my nose in so as to avoid my fellow passengers, the better.
Tae said on 05.31.08 at 01:53 AM • [comment link]
me too!
except if I win, will you ship to Korea?
Tudor Chic said on 05.31.08 at 01:59 AM • [comment link]
I read historical romance almost exclusively and I would //die// for the chance to read something that’s both historically accurate and doesn’t feature the oft-repeated mixture of TSTL, oh-noes-my-precious-virginity type of heroine and the stalker-psycho hero who (kind of) loves her.
These books sound so refreshingly different. And not only that, but the setting is the Georgian period instead of the done to death Regency era! Great review; I’ll have to find a way to get my hands on these books…
alia said on 05.31.08 at 02:05 AM • [comment link]
me! me!
Mary Beth said on 05.31.08 at 02:09 AM • [comment link]
Yes, please, sounds great
rrw said on 05.31.08 at 02:11 AM • [comment link]
Ooo! Ooo! *waves hand* pick me! Pick me!
Beth said on 05.31.08 at 02:16 AM • [comment link]
Is this still within the 24 hours? Time zones confuse me…anyway, I’m joining the crowd of shameless beggars!
Ankoku-jin said on 05.31.08 at 02:17 AM • [comment link]
Ooh! I’m not normally interested in romances (I come here for the snark), but that sounds like a heroine I can admire…
...maybe15? Maybe double that and more, O Spaminator! ;P
shewhohashope said on 05.31.08 at 02:22 AM • [comment link]
Okay, someone does like The Black Sheep, so I’ll tell you all my secret, I really love the secondary couple. The hero’s sensible younger brother brother, and his wife, the villain’s flighty younger sister. I cared more about whether they’d get through their problems than about the hero hooking up with the heroine. And I get really defensive when other character’s call him boring, and may have shed a figurative tear when [SPOILER] he was revealed to have died between These Old Shades and Devil’s Cub[/END SPOILER].
And I really liked Avon as a villain in tBM, but was a little annoyed by him being the hero of TOS, then swung back around to liking him in DC. So either I can’t handle him as main character, or I don’t like a rakish hero. This theory is baacked up by me not being able to finish Venetia, but that may be the narrative condemnation of the woman Dameral ran away with while clearing him him of any faults. The word ‘slut’ was thrown around, and so was the book.
Abby said on 05.31.08 at 02:22 AM • [comment link]
Sounds fascinating! I will give Kalen Hughes a try!
Renee Somebody said on 05.31.08 at 02:24 AM • [comment link]
Sounds like the scenario I’ve been hoping for ever since my first regency :)
shewhohashope said on 05.31.08 at 02:25 AM • [comment link]
Wasn’t there a spell check function on comments? I am so sorry for the abuse of innocent punctuation marks and all of the unsightly typoes, people.
Liddy Midnight said on 05.31.08 at 02:36 AM • [comment link]
These sound great. I love books that turn a convention on its head. Plus the review made me very curious to see just how George managed to dominate the second book. Those pesky secondary characters who won’t stay in the background when it would benefit the main couple are always a trial for authors to deal with. Sheesh, and you’d already given her her own book, Kalen!
BTW, I too loved THE BLACK MOTH. I hadn’t realized that Heyer was so young when she penned it.
Cheers for your thoughtful and entertaining reviews, SB Sarah. Keep ‘em coming! You keep adding to my TBB list. I can still get in my front door, so I clearly don’t have enough books yet.
Hugs,
Liddy
through29 Come to think of it, I’ve fired a few of those domineering seconds, but I doubt I’ve been through 29 of ‘em!
Emily said on 05.31.08 at 02:43 AM • [comment link]
I’d love to win the books. I’m always looking for something different.
Virginia said on 05.31.08 at 02:51 AM • [comment link]
I always love a new take on an historical romance. There are way too many of those “come here, come here, come here…get away, get away, get away” bits of fluff where relationships make no sense. And let’s face it, there were women in that era who said “to hell” with it and faced down society.
So, if I’m not one of the lucky-these will go on my list!
Danise said on 05.31.08 at 02:54 AM • [comment link]
I’m in! I’m halfway through Quinn’s latest and having a grand time. Two days off from work in a row and I’ve read 3 Ranney and will finish the Quinn tonight. Keep the darjeeling coming!
BevQB said on 05.31.08 at 03:02 AM • [comment link]
Why have I not already read these books?! DOH!
If I win a set, I promise to place them on the top tier of my TBR mountain.
pleasePleasePLEASE!
Charity said on 05.31.08 at 03:17 AM • [comment link]
Ooh!! I want to read it. I NEED to read it. I haven’t found a new good author in months!
It sounds like the author really did the impossible. Made a modern female character fit inside an accurate historical setting.
Oh, and my security word is HAVE68. You know what that means? You owe me one!
/Okay, I’ll admit that’s a bad joke.
Rebekah Ward said on 05.31.08 at 03:27 AM • [comment link]
Hey! Pick me! Poor college student here. Between working minimum wage, paying summer tuition(ewww) and saving up for the Fall I am FLAT BROKE and cannot afford books. *begs shamefully*
Rene said on 05.31.08 at 03:30 AM • [comment link]
Kalen Hughes:
Rene, welcome to the shiny pink side. *grin*
Hey, shiny and pink sounds good to me. Most of the books I like have a degree of romance in them, sometimes a pretty big degree, they’re just not shelved in the romance section. I figure genre is mostly a convenience for publishers/readers. The Kushiel series is one of my favorites, and to me that means I like 1) alternate history, and 2) the romance, and 3) gender bending, so… it sounds like I’ll like your books, no matter how pink & shiny the covers are . :)
Just so you know, I’ll be buying these if the internet contest gods don’t smile on me. (They never do.) I also enjoyed a look at your website & look forward to the Rakes of London. (How could I not, with a name like that?)
Thanks for posting through this thread. It’s interesting to get snippets of the thought behind the book.
Wryhag said on 05.31.08 at 03:33 AM • [comment link]
I saw the number of comments and immediately thought, What the hay? There’s nothing controversial about this post!
Then I read the giveaway line. And it all made perfect sense. DA is also bombarded with responses when there’s something free to be had.
Freebies or no, these do sound like fascinating books. Just sayin’.
Sandra D said on 05.31.08 at 03:33 AM • [comment link]
BOOKS BOOKS, I want books!
OK now that I have that out of my system, off to read the holyfriggenLONGBatman comments.
Caras Galadhon said on 05.31.08 at 03:39 AM • [comment link]
I just wanted to say that I’ve been reading your site for a while now, despite the fact that I’m not typically drawn to romance (well, ok, mainstream romance), but you both make for compelling writers, and have certainly helped to get me rethinking romance as a genre.
These books sound like a rollicking good time, making excellent use of the period. I’d love to give ‘em a try.
Cynthia said on 05.31.08 at 03:56 AM • [comment link]
You guys seriously make me want to try romance. I haven’t read a romance novel since a total sellout author came to speak at my high school and gave out free copies of her awful books. You make me want to belieeeve!
Diana Pharaoh Francis said on 05.31.08 at 04:03 AM • [comment link]
They sound fun, especially Lord Sin. I want a set!
Di
Suze said on 05.31.08 at 04:07 AM • [comment link]
Lordy, I miss Heyer. When I first started reading romances, I discovered her (and Sergeanne Golon) at the library. The library had almost every single book Heyer had published, and they were all available to me through high school and for several years beyond. Cut to 20 or so years later, a couple of career changes, and several moves. Most of my books are in storage, as I’m boarding, and my limited space means that any books I buy have to be ruthlessly purged regularly.
So, recently reminded about Devil’s Cub (thanks to you bitches), I trotted off to the library to pick it up. They have THREE Heyers! And two of them are Lady of Quality! (The library is grossly undersized and they also have to ruthlessly purge.)
Multiple copies of Danielle Steele, though. Yergh.
Antigone said on 05.31.08 at 04:19 AM • [comment link]
Will delurk for books.
orangehands said on 05.31.08 at 04:20 AM • [comment link]
This means I should really read my Heyer, eh? I’ll add it to my roadtrip pile for this summer.
LMAO.
Definitely getting these books if I don’t win the contest (pick me!). They sound like they’re going against what I hate in (historical) romances.
blue said on 05.31.08 at 04:21 AM • [comment link]
I wish that I had something witty to say, but really I’m grovelling for books.
Jessica D said on 05.31.08 at 04:31 AM • [comment link]
Pick me! I’m random!
orangehands said on 05.31.08 at 04:41 AM • [comment link]
Definitely go read her short story. Excellent.
Renee said on 05.31.08 at 04:47 AM • [comment link]
Love the reversal of some of those gender conventions. Just finished Daggerstar by Elizabeth Vaughan that had the kick-ass mercenary heroine who propositions the introspective hero who is getting over emotional trauma. Not what I was expecting, but I love that element of surprise.
Sign me up!
LizC said on 05.31.08 at 04:47 AM • [comment link]
Cynthia, at the risk of butting in and providing unwanted recs, if you’re going to give historicals a shot I recommend Julia Quinn (I love, love, love, The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever and How To Marry a Marquis). Also, Loretta Chase’s Lord of Scoundrels.
For historical/fantasy type I recommend Shana Abe’s Smoke Thief and Dream Thief (sadly I’ve yet to read the third book in the series because it was released in hardcover and I hated the cover so I’m holding out for, hopefully, a better paperback release).
I could go on. I’ll refrain.
Maya said on 05.31.08 at 04:55 AM • [comment link]
wowser. look what’s happened to SBTB. it’s grown into a powerful, smart, shiny pink monster. clearing 200 comments on a weekday post? when i first started stopping by it was not quite the same. how sarah and candy have grown! it just brings out the annoying great-aunt side of me.
keep seeing Kalen’s expert comments in resource guides and RWA craft sections - must be fun to see how she applies her own advice
Amy said on 05.31.08 at 05:09 AM • [comment link]
WOO-HOO now these sound like my kind of ladies and can I say, finally, a historical were the heroine isn’t a “demure, virginal, milky white” twit!
Thanks for the recommendation . . . and if I don’t win *snort* . . . I’m off to the bookstore tomorrow.
Sari said on 05.31.08 at 05:21 AM • [comment link]
These books sound like fun!
Jess said on 05.31.08 at 05:34 AM • [comment link]
I enjoyed reading Lord Sin earlier this year. Georgie was a refreshing character. I look forward to Lord Scandal. Thanks for the review and the book offer.
Tina C. said on 05.31.08 at 05:37 AM • [comment link]
These are definitely going on my “must read” list, but getting them for free would certainly make it easier!
*crossing fingers*
Mel L. said on 05.31.08 at 05:44 AM • [comment link]
Okay, so I’m going to Fat Camp for 2 months (wish me luck!) and I need something to read and get me through- that’s NOT chocolate related. Help!
MT said on 05.31.08 at 06:18 AM • [comment link]
These sound… saucy. Count me in!
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >
Add a Comment
Sorry, comments are now closed for this post.