Bitchin' Blog Posts

Lord Scandal and Lord Sin by Kalen Hughes

by SB Sarah | May 30, 2008 | Friday at 6:00 pm | 223 Comments
B-

Title: Lord Sin & Lord Scandal
Author: Kalen Hughes
Publication Info: Kensington 2008
ISBN: 0821781502
Genre: Historical: European

A two-book review from the “And Now For Something A Little Different” department.

You know those women who are friends with scads of men but not so many women? What if one of those women was in a historical romance? What if she were a widow, free of those pesky expectations of innocence and demureness? What if she were bawdy, outrageous, and friends with absolute piles of handsome, rakish men who adored her and considered her one of their own? Who would reign her in? Other women, gossip, scandal, and the expectations of society at the time? What if she didn’t give a rat’s ass about gossip, scandal, or the expectations of society? Who needs other women, anyway?

So, couple all that setup with a depth of historical knowledge that will literally make your corset spin around on top of your head, some sharp dialogue, and settings that are original, fascinating, and located in the same historical period with which you may be familiar, but at often unexplored locations within that period, and you have Hughes’ two books.

That trifecta of historical research, clever setting, and wholly memorable characters, held competently by Hughes’ writing, is some powerful juju.

Lord SinThe first, Lord Sin, is the story of George, aka Georgianna Exley, who is what tomboys grow up to be when they’re wealthy, whip smart, sexy, and aware of their female allure, but also wicked good at things like pool, shooting, horseracing, and generally making a gleeful sport of life. Ivo Dauntry left England in disgrace six years prior for fighting a duel over George. He’s returned to find that she’s a widow, she’s surrounded by men at all hours of the day, her home is an unofficial gentleman’s club, and despite his best intentions he has absolutely no power to resist her. He’s wildly jealous of all the other men, and is completely unimpressed with George’s mandate that, should she take a man to her bed, he gets one night and one night only. Ivo wants six nights, one for each year he was in exile.

So let me warn you: this is not your average historical romance novel. For one thing: the person struggling with moral and personal virtue vs. fiery burn-your-hairs-off sexual attraction? That’d be the hero. The one who has more potential partners than a stick could be shaken at? That’d be the heroine. If you’re up for having your expectations of the heroine’s virginity and relative innocent inexperience stood on their heads, and you’re up for meeting a heroine who will stick with you awhile, head directly to this book and jump in. Ivo is cranky, George at times treats him in ways that made me cringe, but I still rooted for them. The two of them knock heads before they knock boots in ways that toss a grenade on the idea of “conflict” and kick that conflict up in its own teeth. George and Ivo do not have it easy, but when they earn it, they earn it hot and good.

Lord ScandalWhich is why I was pleased and yet somewhat bummed out to find her in the next book in Hughes’ series featured George and Ivo, but most specifically George. She’s fascinating. She’s marvelous. She’s larger than life.

She damn near chews the scenery to the point where if you put the book down you might pick it up to find little bites taken out of the pages, and no cat in sight to blame for the nibble.

Lord Scandal follows Gabriel, a mere mister of some fortune and even more some reputation, and Imogen, the “Portrait Divorcee.” Divorced on grounds of her alleged infidelity after she sat for a rather scandalous portrait (Think Madame X only more alluring, I think) and the resulting gossip humiliated her politically-ambitious husband, Imogen is an outcast in a society she once managed marvelously as a political hostess. George takes Imogen under her wing, and quietly goes about restoring Imogen to society, albeit a more racy, outrageous, and frankly fun, if you’re asking me, section of society.

One element that Hughes exploits to great advantage is the idea of cliques within the ton, as George and her cronies are of “the sporting set,” which defines them apart from other groups, though they all might end up at the same ball or gathering together. Plus, Hughes’ understanding of what sorts of activities those sporting folks might get on with makes for some witty dialogue and refreshingly different scenes. Almack’s my ass: we have horseracing, hunting parties, country parties with fox hunting and shooting - places men would only be welcome except for the iconoclast George and her companion Imogen. And before the book gets top heavy with the manly manhood, there are scenes with the women spending an afternoon reading fashion catalogs, for example, and discussing dresses and styles, which revealed what some women of status and fortune actually did with themselves during the day.

And therein lie my problems with this book: George is all about installing Imogen among her set of manly man friends, and as a divorcee, Imogen’s social options are rather limited. What better group to ignore her alleged dalliance than a crew of dudes? Dudes, obviously, won’t give a flying crap cake. Gabriel, a fixture in the rakish sporting posse, is barely allowed entrance to most social events, and the more outrageous he is, the better he was to read about, and the more fun he is to see within his social circle. But the actual conduct that made Imogen a pariah is never fully explained, nor is the impact of Gabriel’s intimate knowledge of that portrait revealed. I had to wonder what would happen when Imogen learned the extent of Gabriel’s knowledge of her - and since it wasn’t revealed in front my readerly eyes, I’m not sure I can believe it was for the best.

Imogen’s coming back from a place of deep humiliation, so of course she fears the consequences of a shocking and gossipy fling with Gabriel - and she has real reason to fear those consequences, as Hughes makes a point of underscoring just how vulnerable Imogen really is, despite Ivo and George’s protection as her friends. George, rakish social pirate that she is, comes to Imogen’s defense again and again with her own considerable power in society, but essentially, Imogen is very, very vulnerable. And thus, Imogen herself pales, unfortunately, in comparison to George. George is full-strength oils applied with a trowel. Imogen is watercolors. Lots of them, skillfully done, breathtakingly moving, but water colors. George is a canvas you can smell drying from across the street.

Even despite the more frustrating aspects of the writing - scenes that are absurdly short, for example, and ended way too soon for my tastes, and a secondary character, as I’ve noted, who is so larger than life she can easily overshadows the sequel protagonists - the strength and clever originality of the setting, coupled with a whole posse of memorable characters and a deeper knowledge of the time period than I’ve grown accustomed to from most historical romance authors, combined to create a very diverting read. Even if at times I was looking for George or Gabriel more than I was looking for Imogen, I came to appreciate and enjoy the whole set of characters that I was happy to spend more time in Hughes’ Georgian world.


But soft! What awesome from yonder website breaks? It is the giveaways, and I have five! To be specific: I have five sets of both books, Lord Sin and Lord Scandal, if you are interested in taking a gallop around Georgian England.

You want to enter? Leave a comment. Say anything, but say it in the next 24 hours. I’ll select five random winners from the total number of comments, and announce them once time is up. 

 

Filed: Reviews, Grade B, Authors, H-K

Tagged: kalen hughes, history, historical romance

| |

kelly said on 05.30.08 at 06:07 PM

i can has georgian kick ass womminz plz??

KCfla said on 05.30.08 at 06:15 PM

I love bawdy, crazy ladies- in any era.
Sign me up for the give-away please!!!

nekobawt said on 05.30.08 at 06:22 PM

seeing as i was going to look into acquiring those books based off the review, it only makes sense to try and take advantage of an opportunity for free stuff. huzzah!

Kate said on 05.30.08 at 06:23 PM

I’m in! These sound like great reads - sort of the fast, fictionalized Georgiana of Devonshire.

Kirsten Saell said on 05.30.08 at 06:24 PM

You know those women who are friends with scads of men but not so many women?

Heh. I am those women. Now if only I had two coins to rub together, some political clout and a really big gun…

Randi said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM

Would Georgina be considered an anti-heroine, that DA was pondering not too long ago? hmmm…I’d like me some anti-heroine. plsktks.

amy lane said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM

me me me me me!!!  I haven’t read a good Regency in AGES…and I’m a sucker for a well-drawn character.  (I’m also a throwback to the ‘virgins are fun’ school of Regency, so if nothing else, this could convert me:-)

Cassie said on 05.30.08 at 06:25 PM

How refreshing, to have a little switcheroo of the hero and heroine’s positions.  I’m a bit tired of the demure heroine and the rakish hero.  Bring on the scandalous widows!

Cat Marsters said on 05.30.08 at 06:27 PM

Ooh these sound fabulous.  I’m on a bit of a historical kick at the moment as it is (and finding I don’t have nearly as many of them as I thought!).  If winning don’t work, Amazon will have to…

And Kirsten, I’m one of those women too.  Girls don’t like me.  Who cares?  Men buy me drinks.

TraeCat said on 05.30.08 at 06:28 PM

Me me me me me too!!! I’m always game for a new book that someone tells me kicks righteous ass..
the tiresome wilting regency heroine is outdated. Sounds like George says she’ll do it her way or get the hell out of her way..

Mary said on 05.30.08 at 06:35 PM

Oooh, I love a good hunting party scenario.  Although I always end up thinking of this: Monty Python Hunting Sketch

tracyleann said on 05.30.08 at 06:35 PM

I started Lord Sin a while ago and never finished it because there were so many other books out there I wanted to read. I was liking it, but (as of however far I made it) wasn’t blown away. But now you’ve inspired me to dig it up again to find out what I am missing. Darn you…

Jage said on 05.30.08 at 06:36 PM

Oooh, I’m in, this sounds interesting and I’m just getting back into reading regency.

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 06:44 PM

*Squee* I can haz review!

I’m one of “those women” too. My nickname at the local coffee shop is “the chick who’s a dude” due to my showing up most Saturdays in motorcycle leathers and hanging out with all the biker boys.

Kate: I totally had the Duchess of Devonshire in the back of my head (mix with a bit of Sophy from The Grand Sophy, Lady Babs from An Infamous Army, and Serena from Bath Tangle and SHAKE). Those are among my favorite heroines of all time.

Randi: I do think George is a bit of an anti-heroine (as discussed on DA), but I wasn’t about to pop off and mention my own book there. That always seems a bit too . . . too . . . you know what I mean.

BTW, if anyone wants a freebie, I’m giving away a short story on my website:

Something Wicked:  A Rakes of London Short

SCANDAL IS IMPOSSIBLE TO AVOID . . .
Eleanor Blakely is only too aware that her reputation dangles by a very slender thread. One false step, one mistake, and the entire world will know the secret her family has struggled to keep hidden. Unfortunately, she’s found herself in the midst of a desperate series of wagers with a consummate charmer . . .

AND EVEN HARDER TO RESIST . . .
Viscount Wroxton isn’t exactly sure what twist of fate has kept his friend Blakely’s sister on the shelf, but the inveterate little gamester is too fascinating to ignore. The fact that she has five enormous—and protective—brothers is hardly worth thinking about . . .

Erin said on 05.30.08 at 06:44 PM

Oh, man, I’ve been wanting to read these books for what seems like forever - and my library is being pesky-slow about getting them for me!

katiebabs said on 05.30.08 at 06:46 PM

So, the heroine is a “duchess of slut?” Oh wee about time I says!!

Becky said on 05.30.08 at 06:48 PM

Pick me, pick me!  I’m always looking for something new and different.

Kelly said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM

You know those women who are friends with scads of men but not so many women?

Hi! Except as I generally explain, I’m the Janeane Garofalo of the group - one of the guys, never thought of as anything other than. Gets damned frustrating - perhaps I need a Georges to show me my mistakes. *snort*

(And I’m game for a random drawing, since the first romance I read…er..last week.. was a regency era, and I genuinely enjoyed it. And besides, it’d be a nice offset to all the Deep and Serious academic books I should really be reading, instead of flitting about the internet…)

Jean C. said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM

Sounds like a fabulous character.  I’ll be on the lookout for these, even if I’m not lucky enough to get one of the sets.

plaatsch said on 05.30.08 at 06:49 PM

WANT!

Ashwinder said on 05.30.08 at 06:56 PM

Oh hell, I’ll read these!

Annmarie said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM

These sound delish, how’d I miss them?

Jesbelle said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM

Yay for unconventional histories! Definitely going to check them out whether I win or not.

Anya said on 05.30.08 at 06:58 PM

I am definitely in!

Julia said on 05.30.08 at 07:02 PM

Sound like a couple of great reads there! Count me in.

Lori said on 05.30.08 at 07:04 PM

As an impoverished grad student I’m a big fan of free books and these sound like a great way to spend some of my summer break.

Rhian said on 05.30.08 at 07:05 PM

Count me in - George sounds wonderfully refreshing, and after Heyer’s Bath Tangle I’m a sucker for any hero named Ivo. (Even if I don’t win, I’ll be adding these books to my to-read list. We need more strong heroines in historical novels.)

Anj said on 05.30.08 at 07:06 PM

And you’ve won me over! Pick me! I wanna read about about larger than life historical women! me!

Esther said on 05.30.08 at 07:06 PM

Cannot. Pass. Up. Free. Books.
Count me in!

Avi said on 05.30.08 at 07:07 PM

These sound really interesting. It sounded like the first book warranted higher than a B- though.

George sounds a lot like The Grand Sophy, except Sophy behaved when she had to. I am up for anything that brings me back to an old Georgette Heyer.

C. Diane said on 05.30.08 at 07:08 PM

Oh, I adore stereotypes turned upside-down!

Muse of Ire said on 05.30.08 at 07:08 PM

Ooh, me want!

CT said on 05.30.08 at 07:15 PM

Yeah, if I don’t win (and I won’t because I don’t), these will be the next books I buy.

GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:15 PM

Heyer came immediately to mind when I saw the hero’s name, Ivo.  Nice homage, Kalen!

Please toss my name in the hat for the drawing.

Btw, did you all know that there’s gonna be a movie with Keira Knightley about Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, out this fall?  It’s called ‘The Duchess’.

I just re-read my copy of The Unexpected Passion, a ‘faction’ about Georgiana’s daughter who married Georgiana’s sister’s lover of 15 years and their story does really restore faith in humanity, because he became a faithful husband and they really lived happily ever after for 36 years until his death at 72.  I’m reading her letters right now and they are fascinating.

Phyl said on 05.30.08 at 07:16 PM

Me too! I wants!

Sarabeth said on 05.30.08 at 07:23 PM

There is something to be said about the juxtaposition of oil and watercolor. I really like that comparison.

Tamar Bihari said on 05.30.08 at 07:31 PM

I love your reviews.  When you don’t like a book, you pinpoint why with clarity and humor (and I agree nearly all the time, which never happens), and when you do, it makes me want to run out and buy the book (or books, in this case).  So, um, yeah.  Include me in the drawing, please.  Otherwise it definitely goes on my shopping list.  I’ll even break out of my self-imposed mysteries-only run for these two.  It seems so rare these days to combine historical accuracy with a three dimensional, strong heroine.

Randi said on 05.30.08 at 07:33 PM

OK…I have an admission. I bought my first Georgette Heyer book not too long ago, as she is bandied about here and at DA all the time, with raving reviews. Except…I couldn’t even get 3 chapters into it. The writing was really stylized and dated (in that it really felt like a 19th centrury novel-which I find really hard to read) and I found that extremely off-putting. Did I just get the wrong book? Please tell me, what is the attraction to Heyer?

Cat Grant said on 05.30.08 at 07:36 PM

I’m intrigued! Sign me up for the drawing.

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 07:37 PM

Rhian: I couldn’t not use “Ivo”. Even though I caught some flack from non-Heyerites who thought the name wasn’t sexy. *sigh* Two of them pinned me down at a conferene and told me they’d almost skipped buying the book because the hero didn’t have a “manly” name like Jack or Jake. I kid you not: Jack and Jake. The kicker? My three crit partners at the time had heroes named Jack, Jack, and Jake. LOL!

GrowlyCub: The DD movie only covers the early (and rather boring) part of Georgiana’s life. I think it stops when she’s like 26! They’re not going to dig into any of the meaty stuff (her affair with Lord Grey, her gambling, her cancer, etc.). If you can find the illustrated version of Amanda Foreman’s biography GRAB IT. I loved the plain novel version, but all the extra paintings and cartoons etc. in the illustrated one are to die for.

Sue said on 05.30.08 at 07:38 PM

Ooooh, this looks interesting.  I’ve never seen “Ivo” as a hero’s name, either.  (Yes, I am commenting to try to get the books.  No, I have no shame.)

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 07:40 PM

Randi, which book did you buy? Some start off easier than others. Heyer’s voice is a bit slower than a modern romance. It WILL feel more like you’re reading Austen or Bronte than me or Candice Hern or Julia Ross.

If you can find it, try starting with DEVIL’S CUB. I defy anyone to not love that book (make yourself keep reading until Vidal kidnaps Mary, I promise you’ll be HOOKED!!!).

sarac said on 05.30.08 at 07:42 PM

Haven’t heard of these books before, but I am thoroughly intrigued.

azteclady said on 05.30.08 at 07:43 PM

Your comments software is hating on me!!!!/wail


Me, want. I have Lord Sin already but seriously, who can have too many copies? Not I, ‘cause then I can spread the love and

infect

... erm,

push the crack

erm… give Lord Sin to my romance reading neighbor :grin:

*muttering* I hope this works

Rosalinda said on 05.30.08 at 07:44 PM

Sign me up!

GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:44 PM

Hey, how can something that’s clearly a contraction of Ivanhoe not be sexy… some people have no imagination! :)

Kalen, I’ve thought about getting the biography, but the reason I like her daughter Haryo’s story so much is because of its HEA.  Georgiana’s life, while definitely interesting, is just too sad (or should that read ‘real’?) for me.

Kathleen said on 05.30.08 at 07:46 PM

Okay, now I’m totally picturing George from all the Nancy Drew books.  Only now she’s seduced Ned and Carson, ditched Bess and Nancy, and gotten a makeover with nails that could cut a bitch.  Awesome.

GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM

Well, if we are recommending Heyers, here are my top5:

These Old Shades
Venetia
A Convenient Marriage
Devil’s Cub
A Civil Contract

I’m also curious which one Randi bought!

MaryKate said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM

Oooh! Sounds awesome. I’m in!

Tracy Shields said on 05.30.08 at 07:47 PM

Romances that turn convention on its head have saved the genre for me. Just when I think the HEA gets a bit dull, I run into a book that makes it all worthwhile again. I’m adding these titles to my “get and read” list.

December Quinn/Stacia Kane said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM

I always love Kalen’s comments here, so I definitely can’t wait to get my hands on these.

Annmarie said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM

Never mind.  I can’t wait to see if I won.  I am all about immediate gratification.  I am ordering on Amazon now.

Leslie Dicken said on 05.30.08 at 07:49 PM

Wow, well, I can’t wait to read them.  I’ve tried to write historical heroines who were not the norm and was usually slammed in contests or by editors as not being accurate.  Sigh.  Maybe I just don’t have the writing chops like Hughes! ;-)

Chanel19 said on 05.30.08 at 07:53 PM

I read “Lord Sin” the other month and really liked it.  The idea of one man/one night works for me.

Gemma said on 05.30.08 at 07:53 PM

Count me in for the draw!

I hope it doesn’t matter what country you live in?

Chanel19 said on 05.30.08 at 07:54 PM

Read “Lord Sin” the other month.  Enjoyed every page.

fshk said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM

These sound like fun reads!

KittyFinn said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM

It has been ages since I’ve been to the library or bought a new book. As a brand new mom of a month, I think these books would be a fantastic reason to head over to the library and see if they have them. Been a long time since a Historical caught my attention. Thanks!

venus said on 05.30.08 at 07:56 PM

I really like your review of these books, thanks!!!!

Carmen said on 05.30.08 at 07:57 PM

Put my name in please!

(First post, but I did just spend 2 months reading ALL of the archives. I’m actually disappointed that I’m caught up!)

shadowedge said on 05.30.08 at 07:59 PM

There once was a widow named George
who surrounded herself with hot boys
this sporting set scandal
had Ivo flying off his handle:
he wanted his one night, then five more.

Pretty please?
Shadowedge

AgTigress said on 05.30.08 at 07:59 PM

The review says ‘Georgian’, but everyone is now speaking of ‘Regency’.  Which?  When are the stories set?  It makes quite a difference.
;)

MaggieDR said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM

Free books? I’m in!

kpsr. said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM

Hi! Except as I generally explain, I’m the Janeane Garofalo of the group - one of the guys, never thought of as anything other than. Gets damned frustrating - perhaps I need a Georges to show me my mistakes. *snort*

uh, that makes two of us. in high school i was known to my friends’ mothers as ‘it’snotagirlit’skari’. in fact, i think one of them used that as my name for a while.
also, i just wrote both of these books down in my planner with the books that i look for ever time i go to a bookstore. thus far, no luck at the local place, but now maybe i can win them. w00t! (i’ll keep looking at the store, though, just in case.)

Scotsie said on 05.30.08 at 08:01 PM

Sign me up for the giveaway please!

I LOVE it when authors play with conventions.  Just finished “Kushiel’s Dart” and yes, the author had more leeway b/c it’s fantasy, but I still loved the switching of the Virgin/Experienced Lover roles.

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:05 PM

Leslie: I got slammed a lot too. Believe me. The LORD SIN manuscript got 2s and 3s in the Golden Heart (and one 8). People either love it or hate it. I get very few “meh” responses, and that’s FINE with me! But it also got great comments in a few (my favorite—from an unnamed published author—was “Georgette Heyer meets Stephanie Laurens”).

I think it’s about finding the “right” judges and crit partners and looking closely at the reasons why the heroine is getting slammed. Sometimes the out-of-the-box heroine can come across a bit like Hermie the Elf (“I just want to be a dentist!”). The motivation is missing (or at least it’s missing from the page). Are the judges not buying WHY she’s the way she is? Or are they just disliking her on a more visceral level (the “I don’t like bitches/sluts” reaction)? These are very different problems and have to be approached in very different ways.

I think there’s more and more room for unconventional heroines in the genre. Recently writers like Victoria Dahl, Candice Hern and Julia Ross have had some great anti-heroines.

Willa said on 05.30.08 at 08:11 PM

Oooh, free books! The premise of Lord Scandal sounds very intriguing.

shewhohashope said on 05.30.08 at 08:13 PM

Free books, you say? Count me in.

Randi, which book didn’t you like? I’ve recently been unable to finish Venetia, and I love the others of ehrs I’ve read.

I’d rec: Cotillion, The Convenient Marriage, and The Grand Sophy (warning for some quite horrifying anti-semitism, just skip the scene where Sophy goes to the moneylender entirely) because they’re the funniest ones I’ve read so far.

Devil’s Cub and These Old Shades are more romantic, but you may want to read The Black Moth for background (I don’t think anyone likes that one).

Eva Lynn said on 05.30.08 at 08:16 PM

Good lord there are a lot of comments already!

...well, here’s another. ;)

(My spam word is ‘tell39’—I suppose I could, but that would surely just make my odds worse!)

Kristin said on 05.30.08 at 08:17 PM

Ooh, sounds fascinating. Sign me up!

Amy Teel said on 05.30.08 at 08:18 PM

DO WANT

Spider (@ work) said on 05.30.08 at 08:18 PM

I’m throwing my hat in the ring!  A big, fabulous, English wedding hat sort of hat (for which I actually do have to shop this weekend).  Here’s hoping I’ll have some books to go with it!

Ocy said on 05.30.08 at 08:20 PM

Wow, sounds like my kind of historical(s).

And it was good for me.

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:23 PM

The review says ‘Georgian’, but everyone is now speaking of ‘Regency’.  Which?  When are the stories set?  It makes quite a difference. ;)

They’re Georgian. Set in 1788-1789. But the world is not that far removed from the extended Regency period. It’s not going to feel alien to someone who reads “Regencies”, though the cast of movers and shakers is going to be different which might be confusing to those who are looking for Beau Brummell and Lady Jersey and Byron. I’m working on a “Who’s Who” page for my website. I’m hoping to have it up this weekend. *fingers crossed*

Partly the confusion comes from how someone dates “The Regency”. Purists limit it to the ACTUAL dates of the Regency (1811-1820). Most readers, writers and publishers fudge the dates out to the first few decades of the 19th century (1800-1830), covering most of the period in which Empire-style gowns were worn, the conflict with Napoleon was taking place, and the Prince of Wales was either prominent, acting as regent, or king. Historically, an argument can be made to stretch back to 1788 (when George III has his first bout of madness and the first Regency crisis takes place).

Sarah said on 05.30.08 at 08:25 PM

Reading the review made me want to pick these up—maybe I’ll get lucky and save myself the $$$!
Love the site!

Lizzie (greeneyed fem) said on 05.30.08 at 08:28 PM

ooooo—I’m in! I wanna read about a nonvirginal Georgian heroine! Definitely will look these up if I don’t win them. *fingers crossed*

(HA! and my keyword is ‘want33’! Yes. Yes I do want.)

Mary M said on 05.30.08 at 08:29 PM

I like the idea of these stories, especially the concept of the girl more at ease with men than with other women applied to a historical. I don’t think I’ve seen it before. And I love those girls who have loads of male friends, probably because I’d like to be like that too :-p. Count me in!

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 08:29 PM

I love THE BLACK MOTH, but I don’t think you have to read it before you read THESE OLD SHADES (though you’ll love Avon even more if you do!). What kills me (turns me flaming green with envy!) is that Heyer was 16 when she wrote THE BLACK MOTH. 16!!!

I think the only Heyer books I don’t like enough to reread them are A CIVIL CONTRACT and BEAUVALLET. My all time fav is VENETIA.

D-Day said on 05.30.08 at 08:39 PM

Desperate to read these books!

Leah said on 05.30.08 at 08:39 PM

Oooh, me!  me!  Pick me!

Ruth said on 05.30.08 at 08:40 PM

So, as I quietly admit, I’ve never read a Kalen Hughes book. Where should I start?

spamword: lay96. Ok, seriously, why does the spam blocker keep reminding me of my college boyfriend? The one I didn’t marry? Cause this is like the fourth time.

BethanyA said on 05.30.08 at 08:45 PM

What a cool line: “George is a canvas you can smell drying from across the street.”

I just finished my first Heyer last week (The Grand Sophy).  I don’t know what took me so long—I’m 24 and have been reading romance since my early teens.  I have a very enjoyable summer ahead, I think, but would love these books to add to the pile.

Mel-O-Drama said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM

I loved Lord Sin and can’t wait to read Lord Scandal! Yay!

megalith said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM

Wow, these really sound good. Sign me up, even if I don’t win free copies!

Diane said on 05.30.08 at 08:53 PM

Wow, what a great review. 

I don’t read historicals (except early Garwood and McNaught) and managed to resist the urge to pick up Bourne’s Spymaster’s Lady despite the glowing reviews here and at DA.

But, I have to say that I will be running to Border’s tonight to pick up Lord Sin and Lord Scandal to read tomorrow.  So kudos to SB Sarah and Kalen for titillating my interest with both a wonderful review and a great storyline.

OK…just found out that none of my local Borders have Lord Sin in stock so I had to order it .  And that Lord Scandal is a June release.  Bummer…I was so looking forward to reading them tomorrow.

Deirdre said on 05.30.08 at 08:54 PM

I ordered both of these books on paperbackswap.com last week after reading some comments here. “Lord Sin” arrived yesterday; “Lord Scandal” is on its way. Woo-hoo!

I’m halfway through Book #2 of the “Outlander” series, so I think I will take a break from Jamie & Claire and move these books to the top of the TBR pile!

Ruut said on 05.30.08 at 08:55 PM

Gimme! I want! Pleeeeeeease! Pretty please?

*Grabbing control from the greedy inner child* Sounds great, I would love to read them.

Tracey S. Rosenberg said on 05.30.08 at 09:04 PM

Chance at free books?  Count me in!

kukulcan girl said on 05.30.08 at 09:06 PM

These books sound so much fun!  I love historicals.

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 09:06 PM

LORD SIN is getting hard to find. It was a May 07 release and right now I think ordering it (online or at your local bookstore) is the only way to get a copy. It’s the way of the world . . . you should hear my mom complain about it. LOL!

Ruth: These are my only two books (so far) so getting started is easy. If you meant you’d never read Heyer and don’t know where to start, I hear you. Try: DEVIL’S CUB, VENETIA, ARABELLA, or THE GRAND SOPHY. All of those are great introductions to Heyer.

Linnet said on 05.30.08 at 09:12 PM

I’m not usually one for historicals. However these definitely sound interesting so sign me up for the contest!

Alison said on 05.30.08 at 09:15 PM

Beauvallet was the first Heyer that I read (at ... 13 maybe) and I loved it.  I must admit when I went back many years later and re-read it, it had lost some charm, but I still enjoy it.  I think the only Heyer’s I couldn’t finish were the non-fictiony ones.  I even enjoy her murder mysteries

Steph said on 05.30.08 at 09:20 PM

*saying anything*

:-D

Karen Junker said on 05.30.08 at 09:26 PM

Diane - you really should read Spymaster’s Lady!

I’d love to win free books, but I have no room to keep them, so I’d pass them on to the next person…after I read them!

Kalen Hughes said on 05.30.08 at 09:27 PM

I just hated the heroine in BEAUVALLET. I spent the whole book being annoyed that the hero liked her and that I knew he was going to end up with her. *shrug* It happens.

Kathryn said on 05.30.08 at 09:29 PM

I can get them free at the library where I work…but it’s not the same as owning!  Then I can have the spines cracked at my favorite scenes.

Favorite = most sexy

Word: seems48…seems as though more than 48 people are intrigued by these books!

AnimeJune said on 05.30.08 at 09:32 PM

Those books sound absolutely delightful - I do often get tired when it’s always the heroine who is virginal and the hero who is confidence and experienced. Have it the other way around! Some authors (Jane Feather) for example have tried having the sexually sporting heroine, but I was so completely bored by “Almost a Lady” that I couldn’t even finish it.

RStewie said on 05.30.08 at 09:38 PM

Ohh, I’d like one, please.  From the list of comments above, though, I’m not holding out much hope, but I’m throwing my hat in anyway!

my spamword is giving me hope, too!!  thirty43, indeed!

AgTigress said on 05.30.08 at 09:42 PM

They’re Georgian. Set in 1788-1789.

Thank you so much, Kalen!  A wonderful period.  I am a lot more attracted to the society of the late 18th century than that of the early 19th, which is already showing the signs of the rather smothering atmosphere of the Victorian period, and I am sure you have evoked it with real panache and with that firm foundation of knowledge that will make it ring true.  I am going to look out for these books, and really look forward to reading them!

GrowlyCub said on 05.30.08 at 09:44 PM

Wow, I just read the excerpts at Amazon and if I don’t win, I’ll definitely order them from Bamm.com (Amazon is good for that, but not for buying any longer, he he).  Btw, even if we can’t all win, the prices are really reasonable for books ($3.99 and $4.99), but they are also shorter than I’m used to (301 and 285 respectively).

Kalen, was that just the way the stories went or was that a publisher imposed limit?

Spam word: question82, well, if I think long enough I can probably come up with 82 questions… :)

Add a Comment

Sorry, comments are now closed for this post.

  • Looking for a book?
    View our past advertisements!