Bitchin' Blog Posts
: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)
July 21, 2010 | Wednesday at 10:56 am | 78 Comments
I received a copy of this book in the mail, and I stared at the cover for a good five minutes trying to figure out what in the name of potpourri was going on there. Take a look:

First, this is one of the worst Photoshopped covers I’ve seen in forever. I can’t even find a digital image that truly showcases the hatchet and machete job of cut & paste that’s going on up in here. In the actual book cover, you can see this fugly line around the couple where they were dropped in front of the rocky background, and it’s so obvious you think it’s embossing, but no, run your finger over it and it’s flat. Maybe someone got crazy with the drop shadow and outer glow tools.
Hold up, here’s a scan.
read more »
July 05, 2010 | Monday at 10:55 am | 61 Comments
Sometimes, you’re just not sure if a cover is going to work. I imagine this happens to everyone in publishing. Maybe there’s two perfect covers, or two perfect models, and you can’t pick the right one. Sometimes, it’s just a question of hair. Uber curl or long and blonde?
Which do you choose? How about both! Uber-alert reader Tracey sent me a heads-up about these two… heads.
Exhibit A: the paperback cover

Exhibit B: the ebook cover

Which do you like better?
read more »
June 30, 2010 | Wednesday at 10:46 am | 70 Comments
Alert reader Robin N. sent me the following collection of images, asking, “I know you talk about the butt side vs the front side on covers, and the dismembered corpse. What I want to know is, what is it with this belt? Why do I see this belt on practically every UF book?”
Belt? There’s an urban fantasy belt? Oh yes, yes there is.

read more »
May 27, 2010 | Thursday at 3:11 pm | 45 Comments
I’m always fascinated by what folks do with romance novel covers on Etsy. If you have a giant pile of romances laying about the house (like sloths!) and you don’t know what to do with them (and really, who does know what to do with slothful romances?) here’s some Etsy-approved ideas for craftmaking.
Only the best covers can become pendants. But if it’s a woman’s backside, is it really gay? And if a gay tree falls in the woods, is there wood?
You can also make greetings cards out of them, though it’s always better if you (ahem) refrain from referring to them as “sleazy romance novels.” Sleazy. Wow. Haven’t heard that one deployed in awhile.
But if you’ve got a ton, and I mean a TON of romances you want to display and not nearly enough bookshelves to lovingly place each one face-out on the shelf for maximum admiration, how about…furniture?
Get your Mod Podge and Get Crazy: side tables and coffee tables everywhere are absolutely screaming for this treatment.
I have to say, that’s kind of awesome and I’d totally podge the dickens out of a bedstand with…
read more »
May 19, 2010 | Wednesday at 2:21 pm | 12 Comments
Oh, the fun of a Caption That Cover when the cover is so completely barmy.
Here, have another look:

Ahh. Nothing like some sweet, busty WTFery in the morning, right?
So, without further ado, the honorable mentions in our cover captioning contest. The entries ranged from…
The domestic:
Kathy: “Now look, this is how we hang the sheets at my mother’s house. Are you watching? See, it’s just that easy.”
Laurie: This is the way we wash the sheets (wash the sheets, wash the sheets), this is the way we wash the sheets, so early in the morning.
The silly:
Lisa Law: Look out your window at your man. Now look at me. Now look at your man’s nipple. Now look at mine…”
Snidley Whiplash: I couldn’t help but notice, the carpet doesn’t match the drapes
Ruby Duvall:
Hello, ladies. Look at my hand, now back at my chest, now back at my hand, NOW BACK AT MY PECS. Where are you? You’re in a hot air balloon, with the man your man could smell like!!!
The breasty:
Brianna: ‘Hello, I am…
read more »
May 12, 2010 | Wednesday at 10:41 am | 174 Comments
While looking up the links for the Alexis Harrington review, I found this cover:

WOW. OH, man, what the hell is he doing? No, really, tell me: what the hell is going on in there? Caption this cover! You’ve got 24 hours to leave your best caption in the comments. I’ll pick the winner (and feel free to nudge my vote), who will receive a $25 gift card to the bookstore of his or her choice.
Really, what the hell is going on in there?!
read more »
May 10, 2010 | Monday at 10:43 am | 76 Comments
Ain’t no booty like historical booty. And Harlequin knows it, yo. Thanks to Carin, we have not one but TWO historical back-that-up covers.


But wait, there’s more!


Carin and I are both somewhat alarmed by the second cover. As Carin said, “I do think the first cover model wears it better, though I may be distracted by the green mist on the second cover, which I can ONLY see as visible fart odor….” Yes. Gaseous-looking curls emanating from a backside can only mean… something not good.
My question to you: whose historical booty reigns supreme?
read more »
May 06, 2010 | Thursday at 10:02 am | 47 Comments
Elise Logan was kind enough to send me a snapshot collection of some of the finest covers among her library of old skool romance. Among the many, many amazing covers?
Fabio.
According to Elise, this is her secret shame. Well, it’s not so much a secret any more, since I’m telling The Whole Internet.
Behold: the Fabster:

Yeah, yeah, that’s not a big deal. Many people own this book. Heck, *I* own that book.
But you know what they say about romance. And Fabio. It’s what’s inside that counts.
read more »
April 29, 2010 | Thursday at 10:09 am | 83 Comments
While looking for covers for the Chesty-Back challenge, I found a new designed cover for Joanna Bourne’s The Spymaster’s Lady.
Now, I loved this book, but the cover was patently ridiculous:
Knock that oiled chest-baring ab-master off the cover, and substitute something more professional and perhaps boring, and I promise you, linguistics students could study this narrative as a representative work on how to accurately portray the differences in languages…
Oh, that cover made me sad. More than once I’d recommended the book to people who were curious about romance and had to say, “Ignore the oiled abs. Ignore the cover. Hell, spray paint it green. Just don’t look at it and look at the words inside instead. I promise they are SO much better than the cover.”
Here’s the old cover:

And this is the new one, coming out 4 May:

Which do you like better? I confess, I’m not sure that the second one says “romance” either. It’s almost a literary fiction/historical fiction look to it. What do you think?
read more »
April 28, 2010 | Wednesday at 10:52 am | 80 Comments
When I wrote last week about all the male backs adorning covers lately, I had no idea so many of you loved the view of a man as he leaves with no shirt on. And then I got to thinking- what about all the chests? Forget their heads. No one has something so gauche as a cranium on the cover of a romance novel lately. (I love to picture all the heads getting together as a decapitated cover model support group). But chests and backs? There are LOTS of them.
So I got curious: which do you prefer? Backs or chests? There are many fine, and I do mean fine, examples.
Behold, a few examples of Team Chest:



And batting for Team Back, we have:



Now, which floats your boat? Either? Both? Neither at all? I admit, the last cover gives me the happy-shivers because of the arms, not the back.…
read more »
April 24, 2010 | Saturday at 3:30 pm | 43 Comments
Hey. You.

Yeah you. You with the back.

Turn around when I’m speaking to you, please. Tossing your hair does nothing for me.
read more »
April 20, 2010 | Tuesday at 10:18 am | 46 Comments
Heather Osborn has the most awesomest bestest collection of vintage romance novels ever. I’m sure they carry their own insurance policy because they are THAT WICKED GOOD. She was kind enough to photograph a set of her favorites, and this is part three of a triple installment of cover art magnificence.

Yes indeed, this is The Fatal Fortune by Jayne Castle aka Jayne Ann Krentz, 1986. And despite appearances the heroine is not covered in white…goo – the cover is a bit damaged. Sadly, I only have two of the Guinevere Jones books – and since I don’t believe in spending insane money on these hard to find titles, I’ll just have to hope I stumble upon them someday.
read more »
April 13, 2010 | Tuesday at 10:10 am | 29 Comments
We’re back in Wonderland, folks - a trip through Heather Osborn’s romance novel collection. Heather’s old romance and romance author collection is just… wow. This is the second of a three-part tour of her collection. Get some popcorn and have a look at the majesty. Some of these covers are so excellent, we’ve snarked them before - but they’re worth revisiting because… well, LOOK at them!

Name of a Shadow by Ann Maxwell aka Elizabeth Lowell, April, 1980. Look at that crazy art! The crystal gem harp, the flowy hair, the weird spiky plants. Man, I love old books.
read more »
April 06, 2010 | Tuesday at 11:03 am | 37 Comments
It’s like a visit to Wonderland, folks: a photographic tour of some of the best of Heather Osborn’s romance collection. Seriously, it’s like a library of awesome up in here.
Hi all, I’m Heather Osborn, editor of the Tor Romance line. But I don’t just edit romance – I’m a life-long fan of the genre. As such, I have amassed quite the collection, one that has followed me across the country from Southern California, to Ohio, and now to New York. Sarah asked me to give you a peek into my collection, so I’ve picked some of the more unusual and hard to find books to highlight here. So without further ado, enjoy part of my collection with a bit of cover snark and occasional book commentary thrown in!

Demonwood by Anne Stuart. This is a Candlelight Intrigue that released in September 1979. Needless to say, I tracked this down used. First off, doesn’t the guy on this cover look like Roger Moore? Secondly, if this was an erotic paranormal romance, Demonwood would be the best title ever!
read more »
March 08, 2010 | Monday at 11:46 am | 123 Comments
Pam Rosenthal’s book The Slightest Provocation is being re-released with a new cover, which she wrote about over at the History Hoydens blog, (which is a rather awesome author collaborative blog and totally worth reading weekly, yo). The old cover, as Rosenthal put it, would appeal to readers who might be “in the mood for something improving and uplifting.”

And the new cover? Rosenthal highlights the fact that it is encoded with, “hawt.” Since it features her “angriest, sweatiest, most contentious pair of lovers,” Rosenthal is quite pleased with the visual encoding of the new cover:

I am SO impressed, NAL. Srsly, you have achieved the romance cover trifecta! Mullet: check! Shirt unbuttoned, but still tucked in? CHECK. O-face? CHECKITY CHECK CHECK. And a two-point conversion for both waxed abdominals AND a strangely bent heroine leg - way to go!
Which cover rocks for you? Would you be more likely to pick up the first version or the second? What do you think of the redesign?
read more »