Holy Poprocks, it’s Harry Potter

Given the huge megalithic sign in Times Square, I’m going to hazard a guess that book 7 of Harry Potter: Oh My God Thank Heaven It’s Over is about to be released.

Hubby has been reading 1-6 over the past few months, and is ready and prepped to read book 7 as soon as it hits the porch on Saturday. In fact, my payment for four days of hot wild fun in Dallas was to be on primary Freebird duty this weekend while Hubby reads his way through all 85,462 pages of HP7: It’s About Damn Time.

Can you tell I lost my patience with all things Potter some time ago? I think I stopped reading after book 4, mostly because I didn’t like where Rowling was going with the series. Perhaps this was the start of my relative unease with series books, especially those where the story arc is interrupted by huge gaps of time between book releases. But it seems the rest of the world is about to go stark raving barmalicious over the last book.

Bitchery reader Azteclady sent me this absolutely fascinating article from the Washington Post, Harry Potter and the Death of Reading, which discusses the whole HP thing from the despairing perspective of one who is over the HP phenomenon. Seem the author of the article lost patience about the same time I did – when editing for any kind of brevity and coherence seemed to fall out of the top five concerns for any new HP book.

Aside from the diverting, effervescent, and neverending “controversy” as to whether HP is literature, and the condescension azteclady identified for those grownups who read kid’s books (the term “cultural infantilism” is sure to raise Candy’s blood pressure), there are some curious parts to the story as a whole. There’s a LOT going on in this article for discussion purposes.

1. No mention of romance as a genre consumed by fiction readers? Dude. Even if sales figures are up or down or exactly the same, there’s a LOT of romance bought in a year, so why the diss? Clearly us sex-starved, pink-puffy-sweatshirt, swan-hat-loving romance readers are reading and buying. But no, ignore us. Better for our plans for world domination anyway.

2. Distribution is hailed as a possible savior to the small press books that might not get as much attention, but only when out from under the powerful shadow of the Potter machine, which will cause the book to arrive simultaneously in the hands of millions of people, forcing everyone to keep up with every other Jones out there and read as fast as possible so God forbid the ending isn’t spoiled.

But what really caught my eye, because it matched something I’ve been pondering in light of whether us evil bloggers should step near a writer ever again, even if only to compliment the writer’s hat, was this quote:

As Albert Greco of the Institute for Publishing Research puts it: “People who read fiction want to read hits written by known authors who are there year after year….”

So we’re experiencing the literary equivalent of a loss of biodiversity. Since Harry Potter first Apparated into our lives a decade ago, the number of stand-alone book sections in major metropolitan newspapers has decreased by half—silencing critical voices that once helped a wide variety of authors around the country get noticed.

Part of why sites like ours exist is that we, the people behind them, were tired of shelling out $9 to find we’d taken a risk on a book that sucked wind. If people are buying the same authors over and over, it might be because taking a risk outside of the known autobuy list is often an expensive and difficult challenge. With more reviewers to choose from, there’s at least some chance the reading shopper, or the shopping reader, will take a calculated risk based on the feedback from other readers and, dare I say it, bloggers.

So maybe the reason that those “critical voices” have been silent is that there WASN’T a wide variety of authors being noticed? That part of the homogenized short list of uber-popular authors was cultivated by the relentless ass kissing from newspaper book reviews eager to appeal to those readers who seek fiction as something to mention at a party or meeting, the literary equivalent of name dropping? After all, you are what you read, and certainly newspaper book reviews seek to define their own austerity by What They Review.

Now, far be it from me to accuse the Smart Bitches of having an austerity problem. I don’t think it goes with our feather boas. But the whole hand wringing that Harry Potter is bringing about the end of the known world of fiction readers? Hogwarty hogwash. Why is reading so often held up as the only accurate barometer of intellect, anyway? I read romance and I’m plenty intelligent, and yet I’m frequently dismissed for my reading material as plebeian, unadventurous, and dumb. We need a new yardstick, clearly.

Even if I don’t particularly like where HP went after book 4, the early books, much like the tales of Anita, The Gleaming Orifice®, were enjoyable in the early part of the series. Blaming HP and the loss of newspaper book reviewers for the death of diverse reading is about as self absorbed an idea as I’ve heard in awhile, and really, I’m more than happy to deal less often with people who take themselves too seriously, from both the “Harry Potter is the best thing ever!” camp, and the “We’re all going to stop reading and become drooling morons” side as well.

 

 

Categorized:

General Bitching...

Comments are Closed

  1. shaina says:

    *growls*
    i must love you a little less, now, because you do not love harry potter.
    just kidding.
    kinda.
    i REALIZE that the writing is not perfect, and that they’re REALLY long, and kinda depressing and all that…but a book that can get me immersed in a world so much that i cry even the third time i’ve read it when i KNOW exactly what will happen (i’m referring to HP6) is a good book IMHO.
    i dunno about that article tho. i guess i agree with you.

  2. Jepad says:

    This all makes me wonder if the Literati of the 19th century bemoaned the Dickens-craze of the time as being terribly plebian.  All those people obsessing, waiting at the docks to know what would happen to Little Dorrit.

  3. I admit I like the HP books. As for the movies, that’s another story. I can’t stand them. But my goddaughters are dragging me to see them this weekend.

  4. SB Sarah says:

    Jepad – you must be right, that this cannot be a new phenomenon. Our memories (especially mine) are so very, very short term, and are getting even shorter.

    And shaina, I did like the early ones, but for the reasons you described and others, I stopped reading them. That said, I do not share the article writer’s disdain for people who DO like them. If it makes you happy to read and reread them, more power to you. Just not my cup of tea.

  5. Walt says:

    Funny that the article quotes one “Albert Greco” about how “people want to read hits”
    when just he was ALSO interviewed about the fact that the booksellers slashed their prices so much they’re not making a profit off of this final Harry:

    Indeed, a price war has broken out that is slashing the retail price of J.K. Rowling’s final installment by 40 percent to 50 percent at chains, big-box stores and online retailers such as Amazon.com. They’re selling the books for little more than they paid the publisher.

    Call it Harry Potter and the Vanishing Profits.

    “Virtually none of these sellers stand to make big money on one of the best-selling books of our time,” said Albert Greco, a publishing industry analyst and a professor at Fordham University. “The larger retailers are selling the books at pennies above cost, mainly because they don’t want to lose an edge to others offering the same deal.”
    Forbes.com

    I love a good story.  This amounts to the end of a very long story and as stories go, this one was fantastic.

  6. Wendy says:

    What always gets lost in articles like this one is that people are excited.  They’re excited about a book.  People are talking about a book for a change – not Paris Hilton (thank you baby Jesus), a video game, a movie, the latest celebrity scandal, the latest celebrity divorce, the latest celebrity anything.

    A book people!  They’re excited about a book! 

    And if adults want to be infantile and read a children’s book – who bloody cares?  They’re reading!  Reading, reading, reading!  God bless that boy wizard.

  7. MamaZ says:

    It’s the end of the world, nobody is reading! Do not despair, dearest reporter, because reading is alive and well at my house. I read. My children read. The dog, the parrot and even the turtle reads. True, we may not be reading the material which snobs from The NY Times, The Washington Post or Oprah consider “good for growth and culture” BUT we read. I read romance for pleasure, for crying, laughing and sighing. I have travelled the world thanks to Romance. I have killed the ex several times over (great therapy, I recommend it) thanks to Romance—blame it on JD Robb. My TBR is higher than the kitchen cabinets which I struggle to reach. And this is the same for all the bitches that I know – WE ARE READERS. We are obssessed, passionate readers. Therefore, we breed passionate readers. Good golly, Miss Molly we have saved the world! We will not slither away into an illiterate obscurity.

    I’m exhausted…I have created 5 new readers, yet Oprah has not given me a medal or a new car. I deserve one.

    Romance has kept many a store alive. It is the highest bestseller in fiction. Yet management continues to hang their head in shame, pushing the section to the farthest corner of the store. One day I will walk into B&N and find that Romance has been placed out on the sidewalk. So why am I not surprised that elite reviewers will ignore the genre and create biased articles that are factually wrong.

    Hum, I love the bitches!

  8. Najida says:

    I have a friend who’ll be (or was) standing in front of the bookstore for the next HP book.  I admire her for that….the only book I’ll be snapping up in a frenzy is the next Lisa Marie Rice and then the Elizabeth Elliott one that is FINALLY AFTER 10 YEARS, coming out in 2008 (or so they say).

    Otherwise, I’m too damn lazy….easier to just order from Amazon.

    I like the HP movies, but the books aren’t my cup of tea…..but like many things, I can see why others love them and I rejoice that people are reading!

    MamaZ, does your parrot read like my Cockatoo reads the phonebook (tearing out one sheet at time as she finishes 😉 )

    I can tell if something is good if she tears out every page.  It sucks if she leaves it shut and just chews the edges 😉

  9. kate r says:

    I was in a tiny town in vt and the one store was going to stay open to sell HP all night. The idea of all sorts of people all over the world reading the same book at the same time is kind of dizzying and awesome. Old ladies, little kids, businessmen in India. Just wild. Never mind the story. That’s One With Everything is the part I love. A loss of biodiversity? So? How about a wild phenomenon that’s almost as big as its hype?

    My husband started to write a story once about how the entire world happened to be awake at the same time and everyone had the same thought and whoomp, something huge happened——didn’t get that far in the story, I guess. Harry Potter is as close as I’ve seen it come.

  10. lisabea says:

    “Part of why sites like ours exist is that we, the people behind them, were tired of shelling out $9 to find we’d taken a risk on a book that sucked wind. “

    Amen sister.

    That is exactly why I love you bitches(well, that and the fact that you’re wildly entertaining….). You all are directly responsible for my recent Border’s/Amazon/EC addiction. Damn you.

    Reading is alive and well, despite what the poo-poo naysayers what us to believe.

    p.s. Not a Potter fan, either. But where the hell will I be tonight at midnight????? Borders. I’ll be the stunning brunette in the romance section.  Joey Hill has a new book out, no?

  11. lisabea says:

    Oops. Not tonight. Tomorrow.

  12. Najida says:

    Yep,
    sites like SB’s, BAM’s, Miss Giggles etc help me make wise book choices.  OK, they help me buy more bang for the buck I guess.

    I lub you guys! (low blood sugar, off to find lunch!).

  13. Sara says:

    BUT HAVEN’T YOU HEARD?  HP IS SRS BIZNISS!

  14. SandyO says:

    If people think 1)cutting the profit on the HP book will hurt the retailers or 2)once HP is finished reading is dead, have never been to a bookstore on the night of a HP release.

    Do you know the beauty of a bookstore filled with people?  And the people weren’t just waiting around for the midnight hour, they were browsing and getting armloads of books.  I can’t imagine the Borders I was at (for book 5)didn’t make money that night and I can’t believe people (young and old) who manage to get thru the complete 90 Million pages will simply retire from reading.

  15. Todd says:

    OK, I’m not a Harry Potter fan. But a lot of my friends are and they’re very excited about it. Some are planning on dressing in costume and waiting in a bookstore for midnight, when they’ll finally get their hands on their copy. Yes, it’s a children’s book, but they find more in them.

    But think – millions of people are reading real books. These books are long and they do involve some serious concentration. And having read Harry Potter, won’t some of them go on to other books?

    On the marketing comments – I’m depressed that publishing houses seem to put so much of their weight behind marketing books that are going to sell like crazy regardless of what they do. Whereas, if they put more of their resources behind new authors, midlist authors, or those who could use a little push to find their audience. It seems to be such a winner-take-all situation that non-blockbuster books get left in the dust.

    And Jepad – it was Little Nell

  16. Kelly Anne says:

    I am a fan of Harry Potter.  My brother (who is now 19) went ape-shit over them starting at around the 3rd book.  One of his eyes moved slightly slower than the other, and the only way to train it to keep up was to practice, practice, practice, but the practicing gave him massive headaches and he was never interested in a book enough to put up with it.  Until Harry Potter.  He’d read each of them so much that by the time he got to high school his eyes were good enough to keep up in advanced classes, and last summer he started asking around for non-HP book recommendations.

    So yeah, I likes HP, both for his sake and the fact that I love the place Rowling has created and her writing style, to boot.  I do, however, work in a bookstore and I can tell you straight-up that I am bloody sick of the hype.  My God.  When we received our shipment, all of the boxes were wrapped in black, and we all had to sign non-disclosure agreements and basically swear on the lives of our future children not to touch them.  I can’t wait to read this last book, but mostly I can wait for this whole thing to be done.

  17. runswithscissors says:

    Move over 42.  HP is the new answer to the universe.  Why is the world going to hell in a handbasket?  Why is my inbox full of junkmail?  Why are adults infantile and children annoying?  Why does nobody buy books anymore (except books about dog training)?  Who can you blame for the decline of book review sections in the print media?  Harry Potter. Harry Potter.  HARRY POTTER.  It makes my head hurt. 

    On the bright side, if Harry Potter’s taking the flak, at least it means romance has a day off.

    ps
    Now that I think about it, Harry Potter is the reason my inbox is full of junkmail.  But, as Kate R points out, it’s a cultural phenomenon, and I like them.  Which is why, despite feeling like books 6 and 7 were less, you know, books and more very, very, very long prologues, I too will be in Border’s at midnight tomorrow.

  18. Jepad says:

    Not only does he bemoan the decline in reading, but bemoands the decline in reading what he perceives as appropriately intellectual novels. Some people can never be happy.

    I would like to address, what I see as one possible problem, which he sort of touches on: having high school students reading the ‘classics’.  These are books with complex sociological and political undertones and I’m sorry but the majority of teenagers simply don’t have the life experience to understand. Slogging through Ulysses when you’re 16 could turn many people against literature because you’re left with the impression that it’s all so obscure and dull. You can’t identify with any of the characters.

    Which leads me to wonder if all those people who read “Middlesex” and “The Road”, did they actually understand it?  Did they GET the book?  One can read “great literature” and completely miss the depth and complexity.  It reminds me of Otto reading Nietzche in A Fish Called Wanda.  He read it…didn’t understand a thing.

    To illustrate this, I read one of the Oprah suggested books, “Stones from the River”, which I thought was excellent.  One of the interesting aspects was that the narrator was this blond, blue-eyed dwarf living in Nazi Germany.  Now, when my mother and I discussed this, we immediately saw the narrator’s condition as a metaphor for the German state at the time.  However, Oprah, when this book discussion occured, completely missed the point and instead seemed to think this was a book about the difficulties of being a little person.

    It’s hard to know if this is a result of poor education in literary analysis or that not everyone is savvy enough to pick up on these things. And, of course, not everyone picks up on the same stuff, which makes book discussions so fascinating.

    However, I think it’s perfectly acceptable for people to want reads that are purely for pleasure and for others to mix some pleasure reading with literature.

    In the same way, sometimes I like to watch some nice little Indie film and other times I like a brainless blockbuster. I wonder if film critics bemoan people watching the ‘wrong’ movies.

  19. Jepad says:

    And Jepad – it was Little Nell

    My apologies.  Same concept, wrong book.  I should get my anecdotes straight.

  20. Jepad says:

    And Jepad – it was Little Nell

    My apologies.  Same concept, wrong book.  I should get my anecdotes straight.

  21. Rosemary says:

    This whole “Harry Potter is the End of Fiction” argument reminds me of “The Computer is the End of Print Novels” argument about 8 years ago.

    My response to both?  Psh.  Whatever.  I’m going to keep reading what I feel like reading, and those reactionary freaks can just suck it.

    Mildly bitter, but as a librarian there are times when I just get sick of “The world is coming to an END because of books” discussions.

  22. Helen says:

    The Potterdämmerung! It is nigh!

    Heh.

    I’m not a HP fan – haven’t seen any of the films and only made it half way through the first book. Because I was a snobby little thing who thought ‘I read Kiss the Girls at 10! This is a kid’s book! Pah!’. I know the more recent books are written for an older audience than the first one(s), but I’m still resisting. I will read them eventually, but not just yet – something in me takes a perverse pleasure in not reading what “everyone” is.

    That, and the fact that online HP fen scare the bejesus out of me.

  23. Renaesance says:

    Speaking from the other end of the “end of Fiction” I listened to a segment on Morning Edition on NPR this morning that focused on booksellers and publishers raving about the way that Harry Potter as a series book has opened the way for so many more series, especially in the fantasy YA genre.  Any librarian or bookseller is going to have tons of suggestions for what your 13 year old can read now that Harry Potter is over

  24. Kelly B. says:

    “And when their parents do pick up a novel, it’s often one that leaves a lot to be desired.”

    I think that’s the real issue for him. People are out there reading, they’re just not reading the books he wants them to.

  25. Teddy Pig says:

    Listen if it was not Harry Potter people would probably pick on Lemony Snicket and A Series of Unfortunate Events.

    He forgot about those books since they are not as high profile as Harry Potter.

    figures51 = yep, people make up figures all the time. I just wonder why people think that proves the intelligence of their opinion.

    Yet another talking head talking out his ass.

  26. Najida says:

    It’s hard to know if this is a result of poor education in literary analysis or that not everyone is savvy enough to pick up on these things. And, of course, not everyone picks up on the same stuff, which makes book discussions so fascinating.

    Honestly, I think that no two people can read or see the same thing in a book.  How many authors have written something to have it critqued and metaphors applied where there were none? 

    Or bigazz symbols totally overlooked? 

    Reading is like eating, it’s an individual experience.  I’m not going to diss someone if they don’t pick up on what I got out of a book.  I’m also not going to be browbeaten if I don’t find universal truth in a book I liken to emotional sludge.

  27. Jepad says:

    Reading is like eating, it’s an individual experience.  I’m not going to diss someone if they don’t pick up on what I got out of a book.  I’m also not going to be browbeaten if I don’t find universal truth in a book I liken to emotional sludge.

    True, and I think that reading like eating adheres to the same patterns.  Some people like their burgers and fries and tossing them into a top tier restaurant with tuna carpaccio and roasted endive doesn’t mean they’ll find it satisfying.  Food critics might turn up their nose at TGIFridays, but it has mass appeal.

    I would argue that mass appeal rarely falls into step with what critics love. It seems that this isn’t just about books, but nearly every walk of life.  I know, gross generalization on my part…

  28. Najida says:

    Exactly—- Look, sometimes you have to admit that your taste have become honed to the point they’re not with the majority any longer.

    At that point, you can either claim superiority and look down your nose at the ignorant phlebians, OR celebrate that you now have another dimension in your life.

    That you can eat at Krystal one day and Elizabeth’s the next—-IOW, you appreciate, value and respect not only the food from both places, but the people who enjoy them.

    Critics who do not respect the masses and their tastes will find themselves very lonely at suppertime.

  29. Danica says:

    I’m a lurker here. I rarely post, but for this topic I will come out and open my mouth.

    I can’t say that I’m a huge fan of the books. I don’t like the grammatical errors all that well. I would much rather watch the movies.

    “Part of why sites like ours exist is that we, the people behind them, were tired of shelling out $9 to find we’d taken a risk on a book that sucked wind.”

    This is why I love this site! Straight out honesty without the bullsh**.

  30. DT says:

    I think that out of all of my pet peeves, number one is having anyone, for any reason, tell me that what I read is “trash” and you should read “this” instead. Disagree with my choices, fine, tell me you don’t care for that particular style, author, category, topic, no problem, I’m ok with that. It just drives me nuts when others somehow feel they have the right to pass judgement on my preferances. My ex was particularily fond of doing that, telling me what he thought I should read and going so far as to tell me not to put any of “those books” on the bookshelves. With so much discussion about how literacy rates are falling and so many people just don’t read for pleasure, isn’t it a great thing that whatever they may be reading, people of all ages are finding the joy that can be had from books? To read or not to read Harry Potter, isn’t it great that we have the choice?

  31. kis says:

    Neither of my kids read any of the HP books—my son would rather read Halo novels and my daughter is too girlie to like HP. I read the first one and it was okay, but I couldn’t quite figure out what the fuss was all about.

    But people get cuaght up in the hype all the time, over things far dumber, lamer, and more poorly done than anyone can reasonably claim HP is. Think of the Spice Girls, Britney Spears and Pokemon. Am I getting a bit tired of hearing grown, intelligent people debate whether or not Harry will die in the last book? Yeah, kinda. But I’m not going to diss someone just because they’re getting as excited about book 7 as I get when a new Guy Gavriel Kay novel comes out (and if you want a good cry, sometimes over a hundred pages, Shaina, try some Guy).

    Elitism sucks. Truth is, my kids have learned more big words from reading Calvin & Hobbes than they ever have in school, or likely ever will from highbrow literary fiction. It’s heartening that the latest big deal is about a book—and not one written by Paris Hilton, either. Just wish it was one I could get into.

  32. LDH says:

    I now read HP for the same reason that some people watch soap operas. I’ve become immersed in the Harry Potter universe and have gotten attached to the characters to the point where I feel that I know them, so I want to see what happens to them.

    (I’ll confess, in sixth grade I had the BIGGEST crush on Harry (and I know that I’m not the only one), and I’d say that THAT is a testament to J.K. Rowling’s talent.)

    As for the shift in the series, Rowling has said that she’s following her own grand vision for the series, whether it loses readers or draws them in. I give her kudos for that, and despite the bumps along the way, I’ve (literally) bought into her vision, so I’m excited to see where it leads…wherever it leads.

    The article’s comments on the epidemic which is YA novels being read by adults and the cultural infantilism which it spawns reminded me directly of part of the the brouhaha about AtMOL winning the Golden Heart. It seems that the belief that YA = Trashy and Mind-Numbing is pretty wide-spread.

  33. Amanda says:

    Speaking as a person who was a “slow” reader until 3rd grade I can honestly say that I don’t really care what other people think of the books I read. I’m just happy that books are out there to be read.

    Another thing is that my cousin who is a librarian and used to teach 6th grade Language Arts is just happy that she can interest the kids in something other than TV and video games. She is really the one who introduced me to some of my favorite romance authors and YA books as a genre.

    Personally just because I read “Gone With the Wind” in 8th grade doesn’t mean that I can’t enjoy a Harry Potter or Meg Cabot along with my “Canterbury Tales” and Sheakspeare.

  34. Amanda says:

    I meant Shakespeare.

    See even well read people can’t always spell right.

  35. Aimee says:

    I’ve always found the HP books pedantic and very simplistic in both its storyline and character development. Flat and two-dimensional and I honestly didn’t care what happened to them.

    My ex bought me the first three books going on about how great they were. I felt that they were okay but by about book 4, you could sort of guess where it was going.

    Book 5 I was forced to read as I had to explain things to the ex (and is it a wonder he’s an ex) and it was about there that I realized I really didn’t like the series.

    I found that there were a lot of similarities in her plot with regards to genocide (of Muggles) that reminded me to much of Hitler’s extermination of Jews. Even to the fact that Voldemort was part Muggle, as Hitler was 1/8th Jewish I believe.

    It was when my mind made that mental connection that I donated the books to the local library.

    someone else might as well benefit from my dissatisfaction.

  36. “…Slogging through Ulysses when you’re 16 could turn many people against literature because you’re left with the impression that it’s all so obscure and dull….”

    Amen jepad. I taught 8th grade for a time and my main objective as it related to reading was to get kids to be READERS first. You can’t jump into the classics from the start. You won’t get them and WORSE – you’ll be turned off reading. But still so many (teachers – and parents who want to think that the teachers are doing their job) will force it down their throats without any foundation.

    I didn’t get Jane Eyre until I was 26 and WOW what a difference it made from when I was 12.

    As for HP my owl will be delivering it Saturday. I’ve seen the movie twice to hold me over. This is by far the best movie of the 5 IMO. Flat out that kid can act.

    And to Kris who said you read 1 and didn’t see the fuss… get to 3. If you get to 3 and you’re still not impressed than okay. But 3 turned it for me. And in my life I’ve never been in love with story telling as much as I am when I read these books.

    This *is* storytelling.

  37. Marianne McA says:

    He doesn’t explain why it matters.

    Literacy is imortant, that’s a given. But presumably humanity has, for the greater part of history, muddled along fine without reading much fiction.

    If stories are important, they can be told by Granny, or on film, or at the theatre. What dreadful thing happens if no child reads Pullman?

    (And why do the HP-is-dreadful critics universally adore Pullman? Did no-one else think he totally wimped out in the third book?)

  38. LDH says:

    Something that seems to be recurring in the convo… or just something that’s snagged my mind… is how these “great” books are read and then at subsequent readings during different stages of one’s life they offer up something more, and they are understood more deeply.

    Harry Potter seems to lend itself to Kate R’s idea of universal experience, no matter what the stage in life. I’d imagine that the only re-read value is in re-living the adventure and the memories had reading it the first time.

    Maybe that’s a class seperation in books- ones which can be re-read for growth, and those which can be re-read for reliving.

  39. meopta says:

    I’m with Aimee.

    But as far as the omg length goes – this is a pretty common thing, I think. Happened to Anne Rice. Happened to half a dozen authors I can think of. You get to a certain sell point and people are afraid to edit you, no matter how desperately you need it. Writing an 870 page book isn’t an achievement.

    At least this cultural phenom is about a book – but as we await HP world in Orlando does anyone else recall when she claimed she wouldn’t merchandise her work? Yea.

  40. Flo says:

    I think alot of the literaties (I’m making my own words up now wee!) want people to stretch their minds.  To BECOME more intellectuals.  To embrace THEIR idea of culture. 

    Well shit, I want you to all embrace my idea of culture to, therefor verifying that I am the right and only path on high!

    I’m seconding someone else up there… people are READING.  People are indulging in discourse about these books.  People are making correlations between HP and older works (Homer and Tolkien to name just a FEW) and having discussions on what exactly makes literature literature.

    I’d say that Harry Potter, whether or not you like the books themselves, has done EXACTLY what the industry needed.  It needed sensational.  It needed hope.  It needed excitement and an entire younger generation in a feeding FRENZY to get at some books.

    You can’t say the same for other literary works.  You simply CAN NOT.  They have their place but it is not the flash that made the cannon explode.  Those works may be perused and considered at a later date for these kids.  In the meantime people are reading.  Who gives a flying monkey turd WHAT they are reading as long as they are slowly and surely getting excited about reading??

    On a side note I have my copy set aside.  I won’t gobble it up in a day though.  I’ll take my time for this ending.

Comments are closed.

By posting a comment, you consent to have your personally identifiable information collected and used in accordance with our privacy policy.

↑ Back to Top